2015 개정 중학교 교육과정의 생명과학 영역에 제시된 탐구 활동은 적절한가?
Are the Inquiry Activities Presented in the Life Science of the 2015 Revised Middle School Curriculum Appropriate?
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to find out whether the inquiry activities presented in the life science field of the 2015 revised middle school science curriculum are appropriate. For this purpose, we analyzed the semantic network of concepts presented in the text and inquiry activities targeting middle school science textbooks that are frequently used. At this time, the semantic network was visualized in a two-mode method using the Semantic Network Analysis method. As a result of the study, the inquiry activities presented in the curriculum were properly connected with the concepts presented in the text of the textbook. However, in some units, there were units where there was no connection between the inquiry activity and the concepts presented in the text. Curriculum is a very important factor in writing textbooks. Therefore, it is necessary to include all the concepts to be presented in the textbook text in the inquiry activity of the curriculum. Based on the results of this study, it is expected that the inquiry activity will be presented more appropriately through the connection between the concepts presented main text and inquiry activity in the newly revised 2022 curriculum.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out whether the inquiry activities presented in the life science field of the 2015 revised middle school science curriculum are appropriate. For this purpose, we analyzed the semantic network of concepts presented in the text and inquiry activities targeting middle school science textbooks that are frequently used. At this time, the semantic network was visualized in a two-mode method using the Semantic Network Analysis method. As a result of the study, the inquiry activities presented in the curriculum were properly connected with the concepts presented in the text of the textbook. However, in some units, there were units where there was no connection between the inquiry activity and the concepts presented in the text. Curriculum is a very important factor in writing textbooks. Therefore, it is necessary to include all the concepts to be presented in the textbook text in the inquiry activity of the curriculum. Based on the results of this study, it is expected that the inquiry activity will be presented more appropriately through the connection between the concepts presented main text and inquiry activity in the newly revised 2022 curriculum.
참고문헌 (23)
- Choi, D., "The research and development of primary science textbooks by the 6th national curriculum (I) - The survey of problems about textbooks by the 5th curriculum and requeste of textbooks by the 6th curriculum", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 15(1), pp.85~105 (1996)
- DeLeuil, "Transitivity, metaphor and modality:Investigating the link between style and constructivism in science text" (1998), Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching
- Finley, F. N,, "Teachers’perceptions of important and difficult science content", Science Education, 66(4), pp.531~538 (1982)
- 2015 revised curriculum general commentary (secondary school) development research, "Han, H.", Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation, ~, pp.Report No. CRC 2015-28 (2015)
- Jang, Y., "Analysis on relationship of life continuity chapter in the middle-high school textbooks", Master, pp.2008
- Jeon, J., "The comparative analysis of the inquiry activities on the science textbooks for middle School (9th grade) in the 7th curriculum", Master, pp.2004
- 정다혜, "키워드 네트워크 분석을 통한 발명교육 연구 동향", 교과교육학연구, 24(1), pp.116~126 (2020), 교과교육연구소[DOI]
- Jung, J., "Analyzing the learning contents and research activities in classification units in biology in accordance with the transition in learning curriculum in Science", Master, pp.2017
- 김현수, "언어네트워크 분석을 통한 중학교 교사가 인식하는 생활지도의 핵심개념 및 교직 경력에 따른 차이 탐색 연구", The SNU Journal of Education Research, 27(1), pp.1~25 (2018), 교육종합연구원
- Kim, J, "A comparative analysis of the middle school science Ⅱ textbooks in the 7th curriculums and the 2007revised curriculums: Inquiry activities in chemistry field", Master, pp.2007
- 김지은, "중학교 과학교과서 여러 가지 힘 단원의 탐구 활동 분석", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 11(1), pp.27~48 (2021), 뇌·AI기반교육연구소[DOI]
- 김미정, "중학교 과학교과서 생명과학 단원의 탐구 활동 분석: 과학탐구 기능과 8가지 과학 실천을 중심으로", 과학교육연구지, 41(3), pp.318~333 (2017), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- 김영신, "초·중·고 식물 관련 단원의 탐구 활동과 교과서 본문 설명 개념 사이의 네트워크 변화 분석", 생물교육, 48(3), pp.389~397 (2020), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 김영신, "언어 네트워크 분석을 이용한 초등학교 과학 교과서 개념과 성취 기준 추출 개념의 연계성 비교 연구 - 생명과학 영역을 중심으로 -", 초등과학교육, 35(3), pp.377~387 (2016), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- Kim, Y., "Theories of Biology Education" (2017), Freeacademy
- 이형석, "백워드 설계 모형을 적용한 과학 수업이 2015 개정 과학과 핵심역량, 과학적 탐구능력, 과학적 의사소통능력에 미치는 영향", 수산해양교육연구, 32(1), pp.211~221 (2020), 한국수산해양교육학회[DOI]
- 이수상, "언어 네트워크 분석 방법을 활용한 학술논문의 내용분석", 정보관리학회지, 31(4), pp.49~68 (2014), 한국정보관리학회[DOI]
- 임유나, "2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 교육내용 적정화 검토: 공통교육과정을 중심으로", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 15(12), pp.437~460 (2015), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- "Science curriculum", The Notification of MOE 2015-74: The Separate Volume no. 9.Ministry of Education, ~ (2015)
- 박별나, "고등학교 과학 및 생물교과서 과학용어 네트워크 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 10(5), pp.427~435 (2010), 한국콘텐츠학회
- Park, H, "Analysis of the biological themes and their articulations in science and biology textbooks developed under the 2009 revised science curriculum using concept networks", Doctor, pp.2009
- 박재근, "2015 개정 초등 과학과 교육과정의 성취 기준과 탐구 활동 변화 분석", 초등과학교육, 36(1), pp.43~60 (2017), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
- Wellington, J., "Language and Literteracy in Science Education" (2001), McGraw-Hill Education