≪三國演義≫ 眞僞檢證論의 論理的 問題點 一考 ― ‘空城計’를 위주로
Review of the Claims to Verify the Truth and Fiction about the Romance of Three Kingdoms
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Romance of Three Kingdoms is a book that had been collected and assembled by Luo, Guan-zhong; he wrote this book by collecting history books and private stories since the age of the Three Kingdoms. So the genre of this book is faction, there is a mixture of fact and fiction. Since the Revolution in China, democratic governance has been established, and the evaluation of the characters in the Romance of Three Kingdoms has been different from the previous one. In the period of the dynasty, Liu, Bei was adored, but in the Democratic era, Cao, Cao has been reevaluated and his value has risen, because he showed a political superiority. At the same time, it is popular to find fiction parts in that book, let’s call it 'verifying theory of the truth and fiction of the Romance of Three Kingdoms.' The Romance of Three Kingdoms is a kind of history book, at least many people think so, it is therefore meaningful to find its fiction. However, some of the claims of 'verifying theory of the truth and fiction' are not valid in a methodological way; first, they blindly believe in the history recordly, second, often they rely on reasoning without a basis for accurate facts, thirdly, Follow the conclusions made by the previous two methods without criticizing them. In other words, there seems to be a tendency of confirmation bias in authenticity verification. In this paper, we have discussed the following three cases: take the pledge of brotherhood; Cao, Cao kills Lv, Bo-she’s whole family; the stratagem of the empty city.
Abstract
The Romance of Three Kingdoms is a book that had been collected and assembled by Luo, Guan-zhong; he wrote this book by collecting history books and private stories since the age of the Three Kingdoms. So the genre of this book is faction, there is a mixture of fact and fiction. Since the Revolution in China, democratic governance has been established, and the evaluation of the characters in the Romance of Three Kingdoms has been different from the previous one. In the period of the dynasty, Liu, Bei was adored, but in the Democratic era, Cao, Cao has been reevaluated and his value has risen, because he showed a political superiority. At the same time, it is popular to find fiction parts in that book, let’s call it 'verifying theory of the truth and fiction of the Romance of Three Kingdoms.' The Romance of Three Kingdoms is a kind of history book, at least many people think so, it is therefore meaningful to find its fiction. However, some of the claims of 'verifying theory of the truth and fiction' are not valid in a methodological way; first, they blindly believe in the history recordly, second, often they rely on reasoning without a basis for accurate facts, thirdly, Follow the conclusions made by the previous two methods without criticizing them. In other words, there seems to be a tendency of confirmation bias in authenticity verification. In this paper, we have discussed the following three cases: take the pledge of brotherhood; Cao, Cao kills Lv, Bo-she’s whole family; the stratagem of the empty city.
참고문헌 (22)
- "≪四庫全書≫, ≪三國志≫ 裴松之注≪魏書≫, ≪蜀書≫", ~
- "≪四庫全書≫, ≪晉書≫ 卷三十八<列传>第八", ~
- "≪四庫全書≫, ≪舊唐書ㆍ卷一百零三ㆍ張守珪傳≫", ~
- 이영노, "삼국지의 매력적인 거짓말" (2012), 산눈출판사
- 서전무, "우리가 정말 알아야 할 삼국지 백가지 상식" (2005), 현암사
- 方北辰, "三國故事眞與假100例" (2015), 成都時代出版社
- 魯迅, "中國小說史略 (≪魯迅全集≫제9권 수록본)" (1973), 新華書店
- 徐夢莘, "三朝北盟會編 (上ㆍ下)" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
- 易中天, "삼국지강의" (2007), 김영사
- 東籬子, "劉關張竝未‘桃園三結義’", 文史博覽, (1) (2015)
- 黃祖良, "談“大閙長坂橋”中的張飛", 許昌師專學報(社會科學版), (1) (1985)
- 李殿元, "諸葛亮與魏延關係新論", 文史雜志, (6) (2012), 四川省文史硏究館
- 羅勇, "劉關張桃園結義故事流變考", 語文建設, (7) (2015)
- 王宇淸, "空城計的贏家是司馬懿", 東西南北, (12) (2005)
- 謝新壽, "“張翼德大閙長坂橋”的藝術技巧", 閱讀與寫作, (4) (1999)
- 易懷順, "武侯祠的文臣趙雲", 科學大觀園, (18) (2013), 科學普及出版社
- 余競躍, "‘空城計’中, 司馬懿爲何退軍?", 龍門陳, (4) (2012), 四川出版集團
- 張東, "古陽平關考述", 成都大學學報(社科版), (1) (2012)
- 張淑蓉, "論“空城計”的歷史眞實性", 廣西師範學院學報(哲學社會科學版), 37(1)
- 趙逵夫, "論‘空城計’之有無與西城的地望", 甘肅社會科學, (1) (2011)
- "毛泽东如何评价曹操"[URL]
- 陳顯遠, "勉縣武侯祠‘唐碑’初探", 漢中師院學報(哲學社會科學板), (1) (1984)
