손순매아조와 빈녀양모조를 통해 본 신라 하대 孝
Studying Filial Duty in the Late Period of Silla Through Sonsoon : attempt to bury a child and A Poor Daughter and Mother
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This manuscript was written in order to study the traces of filial duty in the late period of Silla through Sonsoon : attempt to bury a child and A Poor Daughter and Mother, which are contained in the chapter of filial piety and virtue in Memorabilia of the Three Kingdoms. In the story, Sonsoon : attempt to bury a child, poor parents tried to bury their child for the father’s mother, however, they found a stone bell, King Heungduck, who hears the ringing sound of the bell, called Sonsoon upon him and awarded Sonsoon for his filial duty. After, he contributed his old house and built Honhyo Buddhist Temple. Sonsoon’s way of filial duty is sacrificing one’s child only for one’s parents, which is Buddhistic way. The reward from King Heungduck contributed Sonsoon to build Honhyo Temple, and the name of the temple, Honhyo, was also named by the king. Through Honhyo Temple, which means promulgating filial duty, we can figure out that the king aimed to boost the loyalty to the Kingdom. In the story, A Poor Daughter and Mother, a woman, who lives as a beggar, supported her mother by selling a part of her body, but she realized her action was not what her mother wanted and meditates the true meaning of filial duty. Not only the daughter and mother appears but also Hyojongrang stands out in the story. Starting with Hyojongrang’s reward for the filial duty of the daughter, even King Jinseong commended and rewarded her. The story of the poor daughter caused Hyojongrang to stand out politically and was used for King Jinseong to stablize his stand politically. The poor daughter, after the commendation and the reward, contributed her rewarded house to built Yangjon Buddhist Temple. The name Yangjon was named by Hyojong, meaning up-rearing the king and parents as high as Buddha. The background of these two stories is just same, the ways of filial duty and reward/commendation are not the same. Though, the stories received attention because the results of both filial duties end up with Buddhist services. Honhyo Buddhist Temple and Yangjon Buddhist Temple are instances which appear after prohibition of Buddhist service of King Aejang, especially, they are built by people of upper class. They were not built in the reason of political method nor concealment for wealth. Their reasons of contributing the houses seemed just for living. The filial duty in the late period achieves stabilization of reality through the filial duty and also pursues stabilization of afterlife. The filial duty is very fundamental action in a family. Using the concept of the duty for loyalty and national ruling ideology was appeared in every corner of Silla. In the late period, the category of the duty shrank and ways changed dramatically extreme, but still the country utilized the filial duty in order to stabilize public sentiment. Also, through building Honhyo and Yanjon Buddhist temple, as the country reached the late period, it is thought that the filial duty was not only in consideration for the reality but also aiming to the afterlife.
Abstract
This manuscript was written in order to study the traces of filial duty in the late period of Silla through Sonsoon : attempt to bury a child and A Poor Daughter and Mother, which are contained in the chapter of filial piety and virtue in Memorabilia of the Three Kingdoms. In the story, Sonsoon : attempt to bury a child, poor parents tried to bury their child for the father’s mother, however, they found a stone bell, King Heungduck, who hears the ringing sound of the bell, called Sonsoon upon him and awarded Sonsoon for his filial duty. After, he contributed his old house and built Honhyo Buddhist Temple. Sonsoon’s way of filial duty is sacrificing one’s child only for one’s parents, which is Buddhistic way. The reward from King Heungduck contributed Sonsoon to build Honhyo Temple, and the name of the temple, Honhyo, was also named by the king. Through Honhyo Temple, which means promulgating filial duty, we can figure out that the king aimed to boost the loyalty to the Kingdom. In the story, A Poor Daughter and Mother, a woman, who lives as a beggar, supported her mother by selling a part of her body, but she realized her action was not what her mother wanted and meditates the true meaning of filial duty. Not only the daughter and mother appears but also Hyojongrang stands out in the story. Starting with Hyojongrang’s reward for the filial duty of the daughter, even King Jinseong commended and rewarded her. The story of the poor daughter caused Hyojongrang to stand out politically and was used for King Jinseong to stablize his stand politically. The poor daughter, after the commendation and the reward, contributed her rewarded house to built Yangjon Buddhist Temple. The name Yangjon was named by Hyojong, meaning up-rearing the king and parents as high as Buddha. The background of these two stories is just same, the ways of filial duty and reward/commendation are not the same. Though, the stories received attention because the results of both filial duties end up with Buddhist services. Honhyo Buddhist Temple and Yangjon Buddhist Temple are instances which appear after prohibition of Buddhist service of King Aejang, especially, they are built by people of upper class. They were not built in the reason of political method nor concealment for wealth. Their reasons of contributing the houses seemed just for living. The filial duty in the late period achieves stabilization of reality through the filial duty and also pursues stabilization of afterlife. The filial duty is very fundamental action in a family. Using the concept of the duty for loyalty and national ruling ideology was appeared in every corner of Silla. In the late period, the category of the duty shrank and ways changed dramatically extreme, but still the country utilized the filial duty in order to stabilize public sentiment. Also, through building Honhyo and Yanjon Buddhist temple, as the country reached the late period, it is thought that the filial duty was not only in consideration for the reality but also aiming to the afterlife.
참고문헌 (43)
- 이기백, "新羅 佛敎에서의 孝觀念", 東亞硏究, 2 (1983), 서강대 동아문화연구소
- 이기백, "新羅思想史硏究" (1986), 일조각
- 민병하, "三國遺事에 나타난 孝善思想", 人文科學, 3·4 (1973)
- 김상현, "三國遺事 孝善篇 檢討", 東洋學, 30 (2000)
- 김두진, "新羅 義湘系 華嚴宗의 ‘孝善雙美’信仰", 韓國學論叢, 15 (1992)
- 조미연, "『三國遺事』 「孝善」篇 硏究", 國文學論集, 17 (2000)
- 엄선용, "『三國遺事』 「孝善」篇 分析 硏究", 漢字漢文敎育, 1(21), pp.449~481 (2008), 한국한자한문교육학회
- 김영하, "『三國遺事』 孝善篇의 이해", 신라문화제학술논문집, 30 (2009)
- 김수태, "『삼국유사』 ‘향덕사지’조로 본 신라인의 효행", 신라문화제학술논문집, 30 (2009)
- 노용필, "韓國古代社會思想史探究", 韓國史學, pp.240~ (2007)
- 임재해, "손순매아 설화의 전승현장과 전승상황", 신라문화제학술발표회논문집, 11 (1990)
- 김기섭, "韓國中世史會의 諸問題" (2001), 韓國中世史學會
- 정운용, "『三國遺事』'‘孫順埋兒’條로 본 新羅人의 孝心", 신라문화제학술논문집, 30 (2009)
- 노영근, "<손순매아> 유형의 분포와 해석", 온지논총, (26), pp.113~140 (2010), 온지학회
- 이종욱, "신라하대의 골품제와 왕경인의 주거", 新羅文化, 7 (1990)
- 전기웅, "眞聖女王代의 花郞 孝宗과 孝女知恩 說話", 한국민족문화, (25), pp.194~225 (2005), 한국민족문화연구소
- 조범환, "『三國遺事』 ‘貧女養母’條에 나타난 知恩의 효성", 신라문화제학술논문집, 30 (2009)
- 이형우, "『三國史記』列傳을 통해 본 新羅의 女性", 신라문화제학술논문집, 25 (2004)
- 최정선, "『삼국유사』효선에 나타난 불교와 이상적인 여성상", 불교학연구, (10), pp.149~171 (2005), 불교학연구회
- 이기백, "新羅 六頭品 硏究", 省谷論叢, 2 (1971)
- 이기백, "新羅政治社會史硏究", pp.55~ (1974), 일조각
- 具山祐, "韓國中世史會의 諸問題", pp.446~447 (2001), 韓國中世史學會
- 조미연, "삼국유사의 문학적 탐구" (2008), 이회문화사
- 이범교, "삼국유사의 종합적 해석(下)", pp.526~ (2005), 민족사
- 김대현, "『搜神記』와 『三國遺事』의 孝行談에 대한 비교 고찰", 아시아문화, 15, pp.226~ (2000)
- "삼국사기", ~
- 곽승훈, "통일신라시대의 정치변동과 불교", pp.70~77 (2002), 국학자료원
- 권영오, "新羅下代政治史硏究", pp.148~149 (2011), 혜안
- 하일식, "『삼국유사』의 貧民관련 자료에 대하여, In 『일연선사와 삼국유사』", 일연학연구원 국제학술발표대회 자료집 (2006)
- 정수동, "유교와 불교의 효사상", 동아시아불교문화, (7), pp.259~287 (2011), 동아시아불교문화학회
- 조범환, "新羅末 花郞 勢力과 王位繼承", 史學硏究, 57 (1999)
- 전기웅, "신라하대의 화랑세력", 신라문화, 10·11 (1994)
- 송은일, "眞聖女王 三代目의 修撰", 역사학연구, 27, pp.100~101 (2006)
- 분황사 발굴조사보고서Ⅰ, "국립경주문화재연구소", 29~ (2005)
- 이기동, "新羅骨品制社會와 花郞徒", pp.185~ (1984), 일조각
- 전덕재, "신라 왕경의 역사", pp.156~ (2009), 새문사
- 주보돈, "『三國遺事』 ‘念佛師’條의 吟味", 신라문화제학술논문집, 31, pp.37~40 (2010)
- 檀國大 東洋學硏究所, "漢韓大辭典 2", pp.140~ (1999)
- 조미연, "『三國遺事』 「孝善」篇 硏究", 國文學論集, 17, pp.214~ (2000)
- 임명옥, "중국 佛敎系. 孝行故事 연구", 中語中文學, 28, pp.242~ (2001)
- 오석원, "유교의 효사상과 현대사회", 유교사상 연구, 13, pp.370~371 (2000)
- 박주, "朝鮮時代 孝子에 대한 旌表政策", 韓國思想史學, 10, pp.310~311 (1998)
- 김호범, "신라 흥덕왕대의 청해진 설치 배경", 역사학연구, (29), pp.57~86 (2007), 호남사학회
