본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신라사회에서의 ‘효’ 윤리와 통치이념

Filial Ethics and Governing Ideology in Silla Society

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This article aims to reveal how the notion of filial piety, based on Confucian texts, transformed Silla's interpersonal relationships. This is linked to how filial piety operated in Silla society. Filial piety is based on the universal emotion of parent-child affection, but it is called by the Chinese 諸子 into an ethic that governs human or social relationships. In the process, the Silla people's thinking expanded beyond kinship and local communities to include loyalty and filial piety linked to the state, thus shifting to human relationships based on Confucian ethics. The first mention of filial piety in Silla is the “孝悌” of King Namul. However, it is questionable whether it is based on filial piety as a Confucian ethic. The meaning of “孝悌” is linked to the remedies for the elderly or socially disadvantaged during the Nisageum period, suggesting that its primary purpose may have been to remove and stabilize social unrest. In practice, the issue of filial piety based on the Confucian sutras can be seen as Wonkwang(圓光)`s Sesok-ogye. It was associated with Zengzi(曾子)`s filial piety in the Jiyi(祭義) section of the “Liji(禮記)”. However, while it is clear that Won-kwang`s Sesok-ogye was based on Confucianism, the view that Won-kwang was a monk and intended to align the practice of Sesok-ogye with the teachings of the Bodhisattva school has many implications for understanding contemporary filial piety. However, human relationships in society were still not as vertical as the Confucian ethic of loyalty and filial piety. Mr. Seol's daughter defied her father's wishes to marry someone other than Gassil(嘉實), and Kangsoo(强首) denied his father's wishes by not marrying someone of his class and status. In general, Mr. Seol's daughter and Kang-soo valued their horizontal relationship, or faith, more than their vertical relationship with their parents. On the other hand, in the special circumstances of war, it was inevitable that the act of laying down one's life for one's country would be encouraged. By naturally linking filial piety to loyalty, the perception of submission and loyalty was enforced through the emergency situation of war, and the relationship between father and son as a vertical relationship was clarified. The highest point of fulfillment of both loyalty and filial piety can be found in a text written in the first year of King Shinmun(681). In this texts, he declared himself the ultimate practitioner of filial piety, combining filial piety to parents with loyalty to the monarch.

Abstract

This article aims to reveal how the notion of filial piety, based on Confucian texts, transformed Silla's interpersonal relationships. This is linked to how filial piety operated in Silla society. Filial piety is based on the universal emotion of parent-child affection, but it is called by the Chinese 諸子 into an ethic that governs human or social relationships. In the process, the Silla people's thinking expanded beyond kinship and local communities to include loyalty and filial piety linked to the state, thus shifting to human relationships based on Confucian ethics. The first mention of filial piety in Silla is the “孝悌” of King Namul. However, it is questionable whether it is based on filial piety as a Confucian ethic. The meaning of “孝悌” is linked to the remedies for the elderly or socially disadvantaged during the Nisageum period, suggesting that its primary purpose may have been to remove and stabilize social unrest. In practice, the issue of filial piety based on the Confucian sutras can be seen as Wonkwang(圓光)`s Sesok-ogye. It was associated with Zengzi(曾子)`s filial piety in the Jiyi(祭義) section of the “Liji(禮記)”. However, while it is clear that Won-kwang`s Sesok-ogye was based on Confucianism, the view that Won-kwang was a monk and intended to align the practice of Sesok-ogye with the teachings of the Bodhisattva school has many implications for understanding contemporary filial piety. However, human relationships in society were still not as vertical as the Confucian ethic of loyalty and filial piety. Mr. Seol's daughter defied her father's wishes to marry someone other than Gassil(嘉實), and Kangsoo(强首) denied his father's wishes by not marrying someone of his class and status. In general, Mr. Seol's daughter and Kang-soo valued their horizontal relationship, or faith, more than their vertical relationship with their parents. On the other hand, in the special circumstances of war, it was inevitable that the act of laying down one's life for one's country would be encouraged. By naturally linking filial piety to loyalty, the perception of submission and loyalty was enforced through the emergency situation of war, and the relationship between father and son as a vertical relationship was clarified. The highest point of fulfillment of both loyalty and filial piety can be found in a text written in the first year of King Shinmun(681). In this texts, he declared himself the ultimate practitioner of filial piety, combining filial piety to parents with loyalty to the monarch.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. "論語", ~
  2. "孟子", ~
  3. "禮記", ~
  4. "孝經", ~
  5. "三國志", ~
  6. "後漢書", ~
  7. "三國史記", ~
  8. "三國遺事", ~
  9. 김경호, "지하의 논어, 지상의 논어" (2012), 성균관대학교 출판부
  10. 김영하, "新羅中代社會硏究" (2007), 일지사
  11. 李基白, "新羅思想史硏究" (1986), 일지사
  12. 李愛熙, "孔子 思想의 繼承1-戰國에서 漢唐까지" (1995), 열린책들
  13. 李鍾旭, "新羅國家形成史硏究" (1982), 일조각
  14. 강종훈, "7세기 통일전쟁기의 순국 인물 분석", 『삼국사기』「열전」을 통해본 신라의 인물, 신라문화제학술논문집, 25 (2004)
  15. 김용수, "중국 예(禮)의 기원으로 본 조상숭배", 윤리교육연구, 35 (2014)
  16. 김진우, "중국고대 '효'사상의 전개와 국가권력", 박사, 사학, pp.2006
  17. 김호귀, "신라 忠義 관념의 형성과 불교의 世俗五戒", 대각사상, 17 (2012)
  18. 나희라, "7세기 전쟁의 확대와 신라인의 殉國主義的 生死觀", 한국고대사학회, 53 (2009)
  19. 남동신, "한국 고대불교의 국가관・사회관", 역사비평, 25 (1993)
  20. 박종덕, "고려시대 風水地理思想의 이해 방향", 역사와 경계, 105 (2017)
  21. 權仁瀚, "출토 문자자료로 본 신라의 유교경전 문화", 구결연구, 35 (2015)
  22. 邊太燮, "韓國古代의 繼世思想과 祖上崇拜信仰(下)", 역사교육, 4 (1959)
  23. 孫煥一, "壬申誓記石의 書體考", 미술자료, 64 (2000)
  24. 申賢淑, "淨土敎와 圓光世俗五戒의 考察", 한국사연구, 61・62 (1988)
  25. 沈桃姬, "효 윤리와 유교 덕목의 관계", 동아인문학, 21 (2012)
  26. 윤대식, "『孟子』의 의리(義利)와 의리(義理): 윤리적 교의에서 정치적 교의로의 전환", 한국시민윤리학회보, 19(1) (2006)
  27. 이승율, "유가의 효치 철학과 ‘효’ 일원주의", 율곡학연구, 45 (2021)
  28. 이현주, "신라"효경"의 수용과 활용", 한국사상사학, 64 (2020)
  29. 이현주, "신라 유교 가족윤리의 도입과 변용-상복법을 중심으로", 신라문화, 59 (2021)
  30. 이현혜, "한국고대사 연구와 공동체 이론", 한국고대사연구, 81 (2016)
  31. 임승택, "세속오계의 배경과 근거-초기 불교의 흔적을 찾아서-", 동아시아불교문화, 18 (2014)
  32. 장현근, "중국 고대의 충군(忠君)사상과 충효(忠孝)관념의 정치화", 정치사상연구, 21(2) (2015)
  33. 조민환, "유가 경전에 나타난 효 관념 연구", 한국사상과문화, 103 (2021)
  34. 조정래, "中國"二十四孝"와"三綱行實圖"에 나타난 孝 관련 도상서사 연구", 중국문화연구, 28 (2015)
  35. 中島志郞, "圓光"世俗五戒"と孝思想", 印度學佛敎學硏究, 40(1) (1991)
  36. 채미하, "신라의 유가 교육과 『논어』", 목간과 문자, 26 (2021)
  37. 崔光植, "三國史記 所載 老嫗의 性格", 사총, 25 (1983)
  38. 한영화, "신라의 五逆과 통치이념", 사림, 53 (2015)
  39. 한영화, ""삼국사기"도미 열전의 서사 구조와 節義", 사림, 86 (2023)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)