본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Does Old Russian Have V-to-T Movement?

정하경
러시아연구소 (Institute for Russian and East European Studies)|2020.05|러시아연구|제30권 제1호|pp. 279-315|DOI 10.22414/rusins.2020.30.1.279

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

영주어고대러시아어Old RussianExtended Projection Principle확대투사원리동사의 시제핵 이동V-to-T MovementNull SubjectRich Agreement Hypothesis풍부한 일치 가설
주제분류러시아어와문학

초록

This paper investigates whether V-to-T movement is attested in Old Russian, by examining word order between verbs and other elements such as overt subjects and low adverbs. The position of the be-auxiliary is also examined as a diagnostics of lexical verb movement. Colloquial Old Russian reflected in <Old Novgorod birch bark letters> and <Russkaja pravda> does not feature V-to-T movement just like Modern Russian, while formal varieties of Old Russian in chronicles show mixed patterns. Given that Old Russian has been analyzed as a consistent null subject language with rich agreement morphology in all tenses, the lack of V-to-T movement in colloquial Old Russian implies that the EPP is not met by verb raising to T although null subjects are conditioned by rich subject agreement. This conclusion also weakens the Rich Agreement Hypothesis in that rich agreement morphology does not trigger V-to-T movement.

Abstract

This paper investigates whether V-to-T movement is attested in Old Russian, by examining word order between verbs and other elements such as overt subjects and low adverbs. The position of the be-auxiliary is also examined as a diagnostics of lexical verb movement. Colloquial Old Russian reflected in <Old Novgorod birch bark letters> and <Russkaja pravda> does not feature V-to-T movement just like Modern Russian, while formal varieties of Old Russian in chronicles show mixed patterns. Given that Old Russian has been analyzed as a consistent null subject language with rich agreement morphology in all tenses, the lack of V-to-T movement in colloquial Old Russian implies that the EPP is not met by verb raising to T although null subjects are conditioned by rich subject agreement. This conclusion also weakens the Rich Agreement Hypothesis in that rich agreement morphology does not trigger V-to-T movement.

참고문헌 (80)

  1. Alexiadou, A., "Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16(3), pp.491~539 (1998)
  2. Bailyn, J., "A configurational approach to Russian ‘free’ word order", Ph.D., pp.1995
  3. Bailyn, J, "Generalized inversion", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22(1), pp.1~49 (2004)
  4. Barbosa, P, "Two kinds of subject pro", Studia Linguistica, 63(1), pp.2~58 (2009)
  5. Benedicto, E., "Agr, θ-features and V-movement: Identifying pro", University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 17, pp.1~18 (1994)
  6. Bobaljik, J., "Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection", Ph.D., pp.1995
  7. Bobaljik, J., "The Rich Agreement Hypothesis in review", ms, pp.2001
  8. Bobaljik, J., "Two heads aren’t always better than one", Syntax, 1(1), pp.37~71 (1998)
  9. Borkovskij, V. I., "Sintaksis drevnerusskix gramot", Prostoe predloženie, L’vov: Izd.-vo L’vovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, ~ (1949)
  10. Borkovskij, V. I., "Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka" (1963), AN SSSR
  11. Bošković, Ž, "On the Nature of the Syntax –phonology Interface. Cliticization and Related Phenomena" (2001), Elsevier
  12. Chomsky, N, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  13. Chomsky, N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  14. den Dikken, M., "Auxiliaries and participles", Proceedings of NELS, 24, pp.65~79 (1994), GLSA, University of Massachusetts
  15. Diesing, M, "Indefinites" (1992), MIT Press
  16. Doner, J., "The EPP across languages", Ph.D., pp.2019
  17. Duarte, M. E. L., "Português Brasileiro: Uma viagem diacrónica homenagem a Fernando Tarallo", pp.107~128 (1993), Editora da UNICAMP
  18. Duarte, M. E. L., "A perda do princípio "Evite pronome" no Português Brasileiro", Ph.D., pp.1995
  19. Dyakonova, M., "A phase-based approach to Russian free word order", Ph.D., pp.2009
  20. Franks, S, "Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax" (1995), Oxford University Press
  21. Frascarelli, M, "Subjects, topics, and the interpretation of referential pro", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25(4), pp.691~734 (2007)
  22. van Gelderen, E, "The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty" (2011), Oxford University Press
  23. Givón, T., "Subject and Topic", pp.149~188 (1976), Academic Press
  24. Gribanova, V, "Verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis and the structure of the Russian verbal complex", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31(1), pp.91~136 (2013)
  25. Holmberg, A., "Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish", Linguistic Inquiry, 36(4), pp.533~564 (2005)
  26. Holmberg, A., "Issues in Germanic Syntax", pp.93~118 (1991), Mouton de Gruyter
  27. Holmberg, A., "The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax" (1995), Oxford University Press
  28. Holmberg, A., "Three partial null-subject languages: A comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish and Marathi", Studia Linguistica, 63(1), pp.59~97 (2009)
  29. Jakobson, R., "Mélanges de Linguistique", pp.143~152 (1939), Georg et Cie
  30. Jung, H, "The Syntax of the Be-possessive: Parametric Variation and Surface Diversities" (2011), John Benjamins
  31. 정하경, "고대북부러시아방언 be-조동사의 접어 분석 비판", 슬라브어 연구, 22(2), pp.119~135 (2017), 한국슬라브어학회
  32. Jung, H., "Different loci of NegP in Old Slavic", Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, 27, University of Michigan Press
  33. van Kemenade, A., "Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English" (1987), Foris
  34. van Kemenade, A., "Licensing V2, case systems and pro-drop", Paper presented at the First Generative Diachronic Syntax Conference (1990), University of York
  35. King, T. H., "Configuring topic and focus in Russian", Ph.D., pp.1993
  36. Koeneman, O., "The flexible nature of verb movement", Ph.D., pp.2000
  37. Koeneman, O., "The rich agreement hypothesis rehabilitated", Linguistic Inquiry, 45(4), pp.571~615 (2014)
  38. Korobčinskaja, L. A., "Voprosy russkogo jazykoznanija 1, L’vov", pp.73~85 (1955)
  39. Kosmeijer, W., "The status of the finite inflection in Icelandic and Swedish", Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 26, pp.1~41 (1986)
  40. Kosta, P., "Slavistisehe Beitrage 260", pp.117~165 (1990), Verlag Otto Sagner
  41. Kroch, A, "Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change", Language Variation and Change, 1(3), pp.199~244 (1989)
  42. Kroch, A., "Morphosyntactic variation", Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 30, pp.180~201 (1994)
  43. Kwon, K., "Cyclical Change", pp.157~184 (2009), John Benjamins
  44. Lightfoot, D., "Generative Linguistics of he Old World: Studies for Henk van Riemsdijk", pp.317~322 (1990), Foris
  45. Lightfoot, D, "The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution" (1999), Blackwell
  46. Lindseth, M, "Null-Subject Properties of Slavic Languages: With Special Reference to Russian, Czech, and Sorbian" (1998), Sagner
  47. Manzini, M. R., "A minimalist theory of A-movement and control", Lingua, 110(6), pp.409~447 (2000)
  48. Manzini, M. R., "Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP", pp.157~200 (2002), Oxford University Press
  49. McShane, M, "Subject ellipsis in Russian and Polish", Studia Linguistica, 63(1), pp.98~132 (2009)
  50. Meyer, R., "The history of null subjects in North Slavonic: A corpus-based diachronic investigation", pp.2011
  51. Migdalski, K., "The syntax of compound tenses in Slavic", Ph.D., pp.2006
  52. Migdalski, K., "Challenging Clitics", pp.135~158 (2013), John Benjamins
  53. Müller, G., "Eine Geschichte ohne Subjekt. Zur Entwicklung der pro-Theorie", Linguistische Berichte, 119, pp.3~52 (1989)
  54. Obnorskij, S. P, "Očerki po istorii russkogo literaturnogo jazyka staršego perioda" (1946), AN SSSR
  55. Platzack, C., "The loss of V2 in English and French", Talk given at the First Generative Diachronic Syntax Conference (1990), University of York
  56. Platzack, C., "Agreement and null subjects", Nordlyd. TromsøUniversity Working Papers on Language and Linguistics, 31(1), pp.326~355 (2003)
  57. Platzack, C., "Agreement and the person phrase hypothesis", Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 73, pp.83~112 (2004)
  58. Platzack, C., "The role of AGR and finiteness in Germanic VO languages", Working papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 43, pp.51~76 (1989)
  59. Pollock, J. -Y., "Verb movement, Universal Grammar and the structure of IP", Linguistic Inquiry, 20(3), pp.365~424 (1989)
  60. Rizzi, L., "Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro", Linguistic Inquiry, 17(3), pp.501~557 (1986)
  61. Roberts, I, "Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French" (1993), Kluwer
  62. Rohrbacher, B., "The Germanic languages and the full paradigm", Ph.D., pp.1994
  63. Rohrbacher, B, "Morphology-driven Syntax: A Theory of V to I Raising and Pro-drop" (1999), John Benjamins
  64. Slioussar, N., "Grammar and information structure: A study with reference to Russian", Ph.D., pp.2007
  65. Slioussar, N, "Russian and the EPP requirement in the Tense domain", Lingua, 121(14), pp.2048~2068 (2011)
  66. Speas, M, "Null arguments in a theory of economy of projection", UMOP, 17, pp.179~208 (1994)
  67. Speas, M., "Economy, agreement and the representation of null arguments", ms, pp.1995
  68. Stecenko, A. N, "Istoričeskij sintaksis russkogo jazyka" (1977), Vysšaja škola
  69. Stjepanović, S., "On the placement of Serbo-Croatian clitics: Evidence from VP ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 29(3), pp.527~537 (1998)
  70. Taraldsen, K. T., "On the NIC, vacuous application and the that-trace filter" (1978), Indiana University Linguistics Club
  71. Tomić, O, "The Balkan Slavic clausal clitics", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 14(4), pp.811~872 (1996)
  72. Travis, L., "Parameters and effects of word order variation", Ph.D., pp.1984
  73. Turner, S, "Methodological issues in the interpretation of constituent order in early East Slavonic sources", Russian Linguistics, 31(2), pp.113~135 (2007)
  74. Turner, S, "Russian as a VS Language", Canadian Slavonic Papers, 51(4), pp.525~546 (2009)
  75. Vikner, S, "Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages" (1995), Oxford University Press
  76. Vikner, S., "The New Comparative Syntax", pp.189~213 (1997), Longman
  77. Zaliznjak, A. A, "Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt" (2004), Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury
  78. Zaliznjak, A. A, "Drevnerusskie ènklitiki" (2008), Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury
  79. Zanuttini, R, "Negation and Clausal Structure. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages" (1997), Oxford University Press
  80. Zeijlstra, H., "Sentential negation and negative concord", Ph.D., pp.2004

관련 논문AI추천

고대노브고로드 방언 영주어 체계와 인칭 자질정하경한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2015 · 제49호고대러시아어 시제 체계 변화의 통사적 결과정하경한국러시아문학회 · 러시아어문학연구논집2019 · 제66호A corpus-based investigation on the distribution of pronominal objects in Russian김보라, 윤정회, HSU, Yu-Yin, HWANG, Hyun Kyung, KITAGAWA, Yoshihisa언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2022 · 제101호술어비일치 주격에 대하여: 고대러시아어 및 북부러시아방언의 비일치 주격을 중심으로정하경러시아연구소 · 러시아연구2013 · 제23권 제1호The Observance of V2 in the English Focalized Constructions박상수한국영어학학회 · 영어학연구2008 · 제26호Clitic Ordering vs. Pro-Drop in Old Russian: An Optimality Theory Approach to the Resolution of a Grammatical Conflict추석훈사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2004 · 제39호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

한국어로 읽는 <안나 카레니나>: 2017년 이후 독서계의 지형도와 새로운 번역의 가능성김진영pp. 1-25‘시’와 ‘진실’의 경계를 넘나드는 위(僞)전기: 게오르기 이바노프의 회상록을 중심으로박선영pp. 27-61우즈베키스탄의 유라시아경제연합 가입: 경제적 기대효과와 부정적 여파의 분석박지원pp. 63-89나보코프의 카프카 문학 강의: 문학적 리얼리티에 관한 고찰박혜경pp. 91-115러시아어 명령문에서의 상: 불완료상과 상호주관성송은지pp. 117-177
원문 보기