본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

“V得比较句”中“比Y”的移位问题考察

A Study on the Movement of ‘Bi(比)Y’ in ‘V-De(得)-BiJiaoJu(比较句)’

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This study analyzed the movement of ‘Bi(比)Y’ in ‘V-De(得)-BiJiaoJu(比较句)’ of the modern Chinese with syntactic, semantic, pragmatic approach,based on the theory of construction grammar which means every construction has each individual meaning. First, as for conclusion analyzed by syntactic, semantic, pragmatic method when ‘biY’ can move to the front or the rear of ‘Vde’. Syntactic features is summarized as follows. the movement of ‘biY’ not only have a decisive effect on the change of existing component of sentence, but also make a difference in the comparison degree. Semantic features is summarized as follows. ‘X+biY+Vde+W’ has [+perfect], [+dynamic], [+all], [-objective]. ‘X+Vde+biY+W’ has [+perfect], [-dynamic], [-all], [+objective]. Pragmatic features is summarized as follows. ‘biY’ in ‘X+biY+Vde+W’ can be ‘Topic’ in sentence by other ‘bi-zi-ju’ structure, can also be old information. ‘biY’ in ‘X+Vde+biY+W’ is able to be component of degree complement, ‘focus’ and new information. Therefore, these two constructions are different. Next, as regards difference between two constructions when ‘biY’ can not move to the front or the rear of ‘Vde’ is as follows. If an adjectival phrase of comparison result in the statement phrase can not only describe properties and state on things, but also express the state which the comparison subject does action then something happened, the comparison object doesn't need to do ‘V(action)’. Therefore in this case, it is used mainly with ‘X+Vde+biY+W’ construction,because two constructions(‘A-shi’&‘B-shi)’ are not virtually interchangeable. Therefore, this study shows ‘X+biY+Vde+W’ and ‘X+Vde+biY+W’ are different constructions.

Abstract

This study analyzed the movement of ‘Bi(比)Y’ in ‘V-De(得)-BiJiaoJu(比较句)’ of the modern Chinese with syntactic, semantic, pragmatic approach,based on the theory of construction grammar which means every construction has each individual meaning. First, as for conclusion analyzed by syntactic, semantic, pragmatic method when ‘biY’ can move to the front or the rear of ‘Vde’. Syntactic features is summarized as follows. the movement of ‘biY’ not only have a decisive effect on the change of existing component of sentence, but also make a difference in the comparison degree. Semantic features is summarized as follows. ‘X+biY+Vde+W’ has [+perfect], [+dynamic], [+all], [-objective]. ‘X+Vde+biY+W’ has [+perfect], [-dynamic], [-all], [+objective]. Pragmatic features is summarized as follows. ‘biY’ in ‘X+biY+Vde+W’ can be ‘Topic’ in sentence by other ‘bi-zi-ju’ structure, can also be old information. ‘biY’ in ‘X+Vde+biY+W’ is able to be component of degree complement, ‘focus’ and new information. Therefore, these two constructions are different. Next, as regards difference between two constructions when ‘biY’ can not move to the front or the rear of ‘Vde’ is as follows. If an adjectival phrase of comparison result in the statement phrase can not only describe properties and state on things, but also express the state which the comparison subject does action then something happened, the comparison object doesn't need to do ‘V(action)’. Therefore in this case, it is used mainly with ‘X+Vde+biY+W’ construction,because two constructions(‘A-shi’&‘B-shi)’ are not virtually interchangeable. Therefore, this study shows ‘X+biY+Vde+W’ and ‘X+Vde+biY+W’ are different constructions.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Adele E. Goldberg, "구문문법" (2004), 한국문화사
  2. Bolinger, Dwight L., "Entailment and the Meaning of Structures", Glossa, 2 (1968)
  3. 曹逢甫, "主题在汉语中的功能研究:迈向语段分析的第一步" (1995), 语文出版社
  4. 陈昌来, "介词与介引功能" (2002), 安徽教育出版社
  5. 陈平, "试论汉语中三种句子成分与语义成分的配位原则", 中国语文, (3) (1994)
  6. 黄健秦, "“在+处所VP”与“V在+处所”的构式承继关系与语篇关系", 当代修辞学, (4) (2013)
  7. 李临定, "带“得”字的补语句", 中国语文, (5) (1963)
  8. 刘焱, "“比”字句中比较点隐含的认知考察", 上海大学学报 (社会科学版), 11(3) (2004)
  9. 刘月华, "状语与补语的比较", 语言教学与研究, (1) (1982)
  10. 刘月华, "实用现代语法汉语(增订本)" (2009), 商务印书馆
  11. 陆俭明, "词语句法、语义的多功能性:对“构式语法”理论的解释", 外国语, (2) (2004)
  12. 吕叔湘, "新现代汉语八百词" (1996), 商务印书馆
  13. 牛保义, "构式语法理论研究" (2011), 上海外语教育出版社
  14. 潘国英, "汉语状语语序研究及其类型学语义" (2010), 中国社会科学出版社
  15. 范晓, "V得句的‘得’后成分", 汉语学习, (6) (1992)
  16. 高程, "基于构式语法理论的‘X比N还N’句式分析", 语文学刊, (1) (2013)
  17. 贺晓萍, "关于状态补语的几个问题", 语文研究, (1) (1999)
  18. 金立鑫, "什么是语言类型学" (2011), 上海外语教育出版社
  19. 金琮镐, "현대중국어 화제화 이중명사구문연구" (2011), 한국문화사
  20. 박원기, "중국어와 문법화-현대중국어의 탄생" (2012), 학고방
  21. 苏丹洁, "构式——语块”句法分析法和教学法", 世界汉语教学, 24(4) (2010)
  22. 绍敬敏, "句法结构的语义研究" (1998), 北京语言文化大学出版社
  23. 史银铃, "现代汉语‘差比句’研究", 박사, pp.2003
  24. 陶瑞仁, "现代汉语“得”字句", 研究综述绥化学院学报, 27(6) (2007)
  25. 张伯江, "汉语功能语法研究" (2001), 江西教育出版社
  26. 蒋绍愚, "近代汉语语法史研究综述" (2005), 商务印书馆
  27. 谢白羽, "面向对外汉语教学的比较句研究", 박사, pp.2011
  28. 徐烈炯, "话题的结构与功能" (2007), 上海教育出版社
  29. 王媛, "比字句的预设分析", 语文学刊, (11) (2010)
  30. 王望妮, "试论构式语法中的构式", 外语教学, 29(6) (2008)
  31. 杨文娟, "浅议带“得”字的程度补语和状态补语", 萍乡高等专科学校学报, 27(4) (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)