韓中日3か国における医学用語の現状
The Present State of Medical Terms in Korea, China and Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Medical terms in Korea, China, and Japan have mainly been discussed with regards to how they have been influenced by the terms Japanese scholars created in the Edo era. This work examines the present state of these terms in each of these countries, looking at how they have been standardized, revised, and added to throughout history en route to their modern forms. In Korea, many medical terms were initially borrowed from the Japanese language, understanding of which depended on the written forms of Kanji characters. As the exclusive use of Hangul, a featural alphabet, became increasingly prominent, decreased understanding of medical terms became an important issue. A large number of medical terms have been proactively replaced by Korean language-specific words or widely known words of Chinese origin, resulting in decreased dependency on terms from the Japanese language. In contrast, various alterations to medical terms have been made in China, giving rise to many words and terms unique to China. For example, the readings of certain terms have been changed to avoid confusion of words which were originally homonyms, and the written forms of characters making up terms have been altered as connotations of characters have changed over time. While most discussions and revisions of medical terms in China concern standardization, understanding of terms has not been considered a major problem. In Japan, the spread of medical terms in society has been limited as many terms consist of Kanji characters with readings particular to medical contexts or abbreviated forms used only in medical fields. To resolve issues with communication and understanding, strategies such as paraphrasing and the addition of clarifying explanations have been proposed, but revisions of the terms themselves have not been observed. Grasping the present state of medical terms is important as terminology in Korea, China and Japan continues to evolve. Considering the issues in understanding and standardization of terms arising due to societal changes over time, and how they have been dealt with to date, the future direction of medical terms in these countries is of great interest.
Abstract
Medical terms in Korea, China, and Japan have mainly been discussed with regards to how they have been influenced by the terms Japanese scholars created in the Edo era. This work examines the present state of these terms in each of these countries, looking at how they have been standardized, revised, and added to throughout history en route to their modern forms. In Korea, many medical terms were initially borrowed from the Japanese language, understanding of which depended on the written forms of Kanji characters. As the exclusive use of Hangul, a featural alphabet, became increasingly prominent, decreased understanding of medical terms became an important issue. A large number of medical terms have been proactively replaced by Korean language-specific words or widely known words of Chinese origin, resulting in decreased dependency on terms from the Japanese language. In contrast, various alterations to medical terms have been made in China, giving rise to many words and terms unique to China. For example, the readings of certain terms have been changed to avoid confusion of words which were originally homonyms, and the written forms of characters making up terms have been altered as connotations of characters have changed over time. While most discussions and revisions of medical terms in China concern standardization, understanding of terms has not been considered a major problem. In Japan, the spread of medical terms in society has been limited as many terms consist of Kanji characters with readings particular to medical contexts or abbreviated forms used only in medical fields. To resolve issues with communication and understanding, strategies such as paraphrasing and the addition of clarifying explanations have been proposed, but revisions of the terms themselves have not been observed. Grasping the present state of medical terms is important as terminology in Korea, China and Japan continues to evolve. Considering the issues in understanding and standardization of terms arising due to societal changes over time, and how they have been dealt with to date, the future direction of medical terms in these countries is of great interest.
참고문헌 (10)
- 国立国語研究所「病院の言葉」委員会, "病院の言葉を分かりやすく", pp.1~226 (2009), 勁草書房
- 성명진, "日·中·韓三國の醫學專門用語の比較對照硏究 : 漢字の役割を中心に", 석사, 일어일문학, pp.2008
- 宋永彬, "韓国における専門用語平易化の試み―医学と物理学―", 日本語学, 33(3), pp.44~57 (2014), 明治書院
- 橋本美香, "医療系大学生における医学用語の読みの力に関する調査", 川崎医学会誌(一般教養篇), 35, pp.27~33 (2009), 川崎医科大学
- 山森泉, "専門科目の理解に必要な語彙指導のあり方の研究―保育者養成校としての取り組み―", 北陸学院短期大学紀要, 39, pp.59~77 (2007)
- 송영빈, "한일 의학용어의 변화", 일본연구, 40(40), pp.521~540 (2009), 일본연구소
- 송영빈, "한자 전문용어의 고유어화에 대해", 일본학보, 85(85), pp.1~13 (2010), 한국일본학회
- 신정균, "안과 학술어에 대하여, 넷째 번 눈의 날을 맞이하여", 성신대학의학부학보, 2, pp.1~5 (1958)
- 은희철, "주제발표 2: 의학용어 권장용어 선정의 방향", 대한민국의학한림원 제16회의학용어 원탁토론회, pp.11~17 (2010), 대한민국의학한림원
- 송영빈, "아름다운 우리말 의학 전문용어 만들기", pp.1~348 (2013), 커뮤니케이션북스
