『일포사서』와의 대비를 통해 본 『왜어유해』 어휘의 성격
The characteristics of Wagonikai(倭語類顔) in terms of vocabulary collection and a study material through comparative study of Nippo Jisho(日葡辞書)
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
『倭語類解』는 조선시대 사역원에서 일본어 사전 혹은 일본어 어휘집으로 사용되었다. 본 조사에서는,『倭語類解』수록 일본어 어휘를 『日葡辞書』의 수록어휘와 비교하였다. 조사의 목적은, 『日葡辞書』와 비교하였을 때『倭語類解』에만 수록되어 있는 어휘를 통하여,『倭語類解』의 성격을 보다 분명히 하는 것이다. 『日葡辞書』와의 불일치어휘를 추출하는 작업은, 두 가지로 나누어 실시하였다. 우선, 같은 단어로 인정한 어휘군 내에서, 음운(音韻)과 음사(音寫)방법에 미세한 차이를 보이는 것들을 집계한 <집계①>이 있다. 다음으로, 설정한 기준 내에서 동어(同語)로 인정한 어휘를 배제하였을 때 남는 어휘군, 즉 『日葡辞書』에는 수록되어 있지 않으나 『倭語類解』에는 수록되어 있는 어휘를 집계한 <집계②>가 있다. <집계①>에서는, 『倭語類解』의 음사(音寫)와 용언(用言)표제어의 기재경향이 드러났다. <집계②>에서는, 『倭語類解』 수록 어휘의 학습서로서의 성격을 확인할 수 있었다.
Abstract
Wagonikai was used as Japanese dictionaries or wordbooks by Sayeokwon(The translation service institution)of the Joseon Dynasty era. This study has been conducted by comparing the Japanese vocabularies of the Wagonikai with vocabulary collection contained in Nippo Jisho(Japanese-Portuguese dictionary). The purpose of this study aims to clearly distinguish characteristics of the Wagonikai by means of research into unique vocabularies included only in the Wagonikai comparing to the Nippo Jisho. The research of identifying inconsistent vocabularies in Nippo Jisho has been carried out two different studies. Firstly, <Aggregation①> describes delicate differences of method between phoneme and phonetic notation(音寫) among vocabulary group recognized as synonyms. Secondly, <Aggregation②> describes the vocabularies that are not included in the Nippo Jisho but the Wagoruikai, which are the rest of vocabularies that are subtracted the synonyms group within the adopted criterion. In <Aggregation①>, it was noted some patterns of writing style between phonetic value and the predicate of Wagoruikai. It was also identified that there were confusions between unique transcription of Wagoruikai and equivalent ones used after the period of Nippo Jisho. Distinctively, it was noted that Ta-line(タ行) and Na-line(ナ行) was marked as [e], and the rest of vowel line E(エ段) was marked as [je]. The regularity in presentation method of predicate headword were not noted. In <Aggregation②>, it was able to ensure the purpose of study of vocabulary collection included in the Wagonikai. The inconsistent vocabularies were commonly identified in terms related to the diplomacy and commerce. The first objective of study of foreign languages in Sayeokwon during the Joseon Dynasty era was to lean the languages through official exchanges between countries such as the diplomacy or commerce. Therefore, through the review on the Wagonikai in terns of study materials, it is determined as the study materials of foreign languages particularly for the purpose of official business and practicality.
참고문헌 (22)
- 鄭 光, "司譯院 倭學 硏究: 倭學書와 그 變遷을 中心으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1988
- 정광, "司譯院 倭學硏究", pp.74~148 (1988), 태학사
- 정광, "四本対照－倭語類解 上(研究編)", pp.11~39 (2004), J&C
- 정광, "四本対照－倭語類解 下(資料編)", pp.9~245 (2004), J&C
- 성희경, "韓日対訳辞書『倭語類解』の研究－日本語字音の諸相を中心に－", pp.35~108 (2003), 도서출판 박이정
- 扈圭珍, "『日葡辞書』との対比から見た『倭語類解』の収録語彙", 博士, pp.2011
- 大友信, "『捷解新語』の国語音の研究", 文化, 21(4), pp.16~24 (1957), 東北大学文学会
- 大友信, "『捷解新語』の成立時期私見", 文芸研究, (26), pp.56~66 (1957), 日本文芸研究会
- 亀井孝, "日葡辞書 = Vocabvlario da lingoa de Iapam", pp.9~20 (1973), 勉誠社
- 京都大学文学部国語学国文学研究室, "倭語類解－本文・国語・漢字索引", pp.1~225 (1958), 京都大学国文学会
- 小林正義, "『倭語類解』の文献学的研究", 석사, pp.2004
- 佐藤武義, "近世方言辞書第５輯－倭語類解", pp.17~249 (2000), 港の人
- 土井洋一, "倭語類解考", 国語国文, 28(9), pp.1~48 (1959)
- 土井忠生, "邦訳 日葡辞書", pp.3~865 (1980), 岩波書店
- 飛田良文, "日本語学研究事典", pp.857~ (2007), 明治書院
- 森田武, "捷解新語の国語について―その資料性の考察", 国語学攷, (10), pp.5~16 (1952), 広島大学国語国文学会
- 森田武, "捷解新語の成立の時期について", 国語国文, 24(3), pp.140~152 (1955), 中央図書
- 森田武, "日葡辞書提要", pp.1~102 (1993), 清文堂
- 浜田敦, "倭語類解－本文・国語・漢字索引", pp.1~8 (1958), 京都大学国文学会
- 浜田敦, "朝鮮資料による日本語研究", pp.13~23 (1970), 岩波書店
- 安田章, "朝鮮資料と中世国語", pp.190~248 (1980), 笠間書院
- 安田章, "資料紹介－韓国国立中央図書館蔵『倭語類解』", 国語国文, 55(4), pp.48~52 (1986), 京都大学文学部国語学国文学研究室