『계간 삼천리』 시좌(視座) 연구 ― 11호 특집 「일본인과 조선어」를 중심으로 ―

Abstract

In the perspective of 「『Samcheonri』Viewpoint」, as a result of analyzing Special Feature 「Japanese People and Language of Joseon」, macroscopic edition direction could be found in the point that it dia-chronically grasped the past, present, and future of the two countries, such as starting from various casting of light upon the influence relationship rather than tracing Japanese people and language of Joseon in simple and flat way, analyzing the structure of prejudice of Japanese people on Joseon, and casting light upon Japanese diplomat Amenomori Hoshu, who held the standpoint of good-neighborhood diplomacy between Joseon and Japan, in three dimensions. The significance of this special feature is, first, that it overcomes the temptation of becoming emotional about the sensitive relationship between Joseon and Japan or self-contradictional derivation of conclusion with various opinions. Second, it can be highly appreciated as a presentation of vision for the future of responsible mass communication that it not only presented the keyword of the error of self absolutization, which Japan had fallen into, to swiftly solved the problems of Japan's ignoring of Joseon, trying to usurp Joseon's language, error of Japanese Joseon researchers, and Joseon policy, but also presented the correct findings on people of Joseon through the learning of Joseon language getting out of stereotype Joseon view made by Japanese people with Japanese language. Third, it did not stop at presenting issue of the phenomenons that are caused by the above problems but also presented new vision of the relationship between the two countries through actual examples. Finally, this special feature is not a stationary article stoping at diagnosing the pathology but it is an article moving toward the future by also presenting new prescription. But, on the other hand, it cannot be overlooked that it also exposes many things lacking. Logical arming against deep rooted conventionality and outdated assertions of Japanese writers still rampant today is missing, and the point that only relatively Joseon-friendly or Joseon-supporting Japanese people appeared without the stage of heated discussion for actual verbal battle with them is left as a room and limit that can face criticism of being complacent.