본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

後期洒落本と『春香伝』に見える滑稽化方法について- 「落ち」を中心に -

Humorous methods in both later Syarebon and TyunHyanCyon- Focus on the punchline

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류일본어와문학

초록

Humor is an important and characteristic element in both later Syarebon and Pansori novel, TyunHyanCyon. In these popular love stories for the public in the contemporaneous era, which stories were unfolded in the red-light district, I would like to study and compare the specific methods used in both works in order to induce a laugh in terms of the structure of the story and its rhetoric (enumerations).Thereby,Iintendtoshowthehomogeneousnessand heterogeneousness of humorous expressions used in both Japan and Korea. Especially, I noted the similarity of punchline among rhetorics. While the punchline were similarly used as a common expression in order to induce a laugh in both works, its roles in both works were different. For instance, while punchline was used as an effective method to consummate the joke in Zitpensya Itku, Sikitei Samba and Sinrotei, it was mainly used to consummate enumeration in TyunHyanCyon. Unlike later Syarebon enumeration was often used in the long sentences of TyunHyanCyon and punchline frequently accompany the end of such enumeration. In the sentence where the speaker was disclosed, from my standpoint, effective direction was experimented by including punchline into the emphasized part of the story, which were developed by the method of enumeration. Prior studies showed that humor in Pansori novel was used to vulgarize and satirize the noble things. Although the equivalent of punchline was not found in these prior studies, it would be possible to view the punchline of this subject study with the similarity in those prior studies. The function of punchline in later Syarebon, however, does not mainly lie in vulgarizing or satirizing. As indicated above, I studied and compared the homogeneousness and heterogeneousnessofhumorousmethodsinbothlaterSyarebonand TyunHyanCyon by demonstrating the difference of its function despite using the same rhetoric.

Abstract

Humor is an important and characteristic element in both later Syarebon and Pansori novel, TyunHyanCyon. In these popular love stories for the public in the contemporaneous era, which stories were unfolded in the red-light district, I would like to study and compare the specific methods used in both works in order to induce a laugh in terms of the structure of the story and its rhetoric (enumerations).Thereby,Iintendtoshowthehomogeneousnessand heterogeneousness of humorous expressions used in both Japan and Korea. Especially, I noted the similarity of punchline among rhetorics. While the punchline were similarly used as a common expression in order to induce a laugh in both works, its roles in both works were different. For instance, while punchline was used as an effective method to consummate the joke in Zitpensya Itku, Sikitei Samba and Sinrotei, it was mainly used to consummate enumeration in TyunHyanCyon. Unlike later Syarebon enumeration was often used in the long sentences of TyunHyanCyon and punchline frequently accompany the end of such enumeration. In the sentence where the speaker was disclosed, from my standpoint, effective direction was experimented by including punchline into the emphasized part of the story, which were developed by the method of enumeration. Prior studies showed that humor in Pansori novel was used to vulgarize and satirize the noble things. Although the equivalent of punchline was not found in these prior studies, it would be possible to view the punchline of this subject study with the similarity in those prior studies. The function of punchline in later Syarebon, however, does not mainly lie in vulgarizing or satirizing. As indicated above, I studied and compared the homogeneousness and heterogeneousnessofhumorousmethodsinbothlaterSyarebonand TyunHyanCyon by demonstrating the difference of its function despite using the same rhetoric.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 江口一久, "ことば遊びの民族誌" (1990), 大修館書店
  2. 九州大学所蔵, "京板二十五張本 興甫伝"
  3. 金東旭, "韓国学報 in : (九州大学蔵)京板三十五張本春香伝" (1977), 一志社
  4. 金東旭, "春香伝比較研究" (1979), 三英社
  5. 小林路易, "掛詞の比較文学的考察" (2001), 早稲田大学出版部
  6. "洒落本大成" (1988), 中央公論社
  7. ジャクリーヌ, "物尽くしー日本的レトリックの伝統" (1997), 平凡社
  8. 神保五弥, "末期洒落本の位相", 国文学研究, (2) (1950)
  9. 鈴木久美, "噺本におけるハナシテの存在ー安永期作品を中心に", 日本文学, (51) (2002), 日本文学協会
  10. 拙稿, "韓日近世大衆小説様式の比較研究ー坊刻本小説と江戸戯作を中心に", 外国文学研究, (27) (2007), 韓国外国語大学校外国文学研究所
  11. 拙稿, "春香伝』と後期洒落本における喜劇構造比較研究ー笑劇と漫談的形式を中心に", 日本語文学, (34) (2007), 韓国日本語文学会
  12. 拙稿, "一九洒落本における滑稽ー京伝との比較を通してー", 語文研究, (83) (1997), 九州大学国語国文学会
  13. 拙稿, "十返舎一九洒落本における教訓性─振鷺亭・式亭三馬との対照を通してー", 文学研究, (89) (2001), 日本文学研究会
  14. 拙稿, "日韓滑稽文学における対比研究試論 ―『東海道中膝栗毛』と『興甫伝』を中心に―", 国際日本文学研究集会会議録, (26) (2003), 国文学研究資料館
  15. 拙稿, "『膝栗毛』と『興甫伝』の比較文学的研究可能性について", 日本語文学, (16) (2003), 韓国日本語文学会
  16. 拙稿, "一九洒落本における類型的人物像について", 語文研究, (86-87) (1999), 九州大学国語国文学会
  17. 棚橋正博, "『春色由縁の梅』の成立と刊行が意味するものー洒落本の終焉と人情本の発生", 国語と国文学, (特集) (2006), 東京大学国語国文学会
  18. 中村幸彦校注, "日本古典文学全集 in : 東海道中膝栗毛" (1985), 小学館
  19. 野村雅昭, "落語の言語学" (1994), 平凡社
  20. 野村雅昭, "小咄=ジョーク学", 笑い学研究, (7) (2001), 日本笑い学会
  21. 邊恩田, "文芸用語の基礎知識 in : 語り物の比較研究ー韓国のパンソリ・巫歌と日本の語り物" (1988), 至文堂

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)