본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국문학 연구에 있어 희극성의 ‘개념’과 ‘범주’ 설정을 위한 예비적 시론

A Preliminary Essay for the Establishment of 'Concept' and 'Category in Studies on the Comic in Korean Literature

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

The ultimate goal of this study is to define the principle of comedy and to deepen the debate by describing the lineage of Korean comic novels and by considering aspects of their development. The concept of ‘comic’is derived from the word ‘comedy’ which is a sub-genre of drama,contrasting concepts of tragedy. On the other hand, the definition of terms and concepts should be general and flexible in order to obtain agreement among its users in the level of compliance and universal validity. I would like to define ‘the comic’ in this paper as comic qualities which ‘cause laughter to the subject.’ I do not define the comic as the subjective and objective at the level of micro-layers but as ‘the interaction of subjects and object’ at the level of comprehension. According to this view, the comic can be redefined as “properties and qualities that cause the subject laughter in the interaction between subject and object.” As a subcategory of ‘the comic’, the concepts of satire and humor, irony, and their mutual relationships between the concepts are as follows. In the relation of subject(X) and object(Y), the structure of satire is defined as that in which ‘X criticizes Y’, and the humorous as that in which ‘X reconcilies with Y.’ In contrast, irony is defined as tension and the reflective sense of distance. Based on the relationship between subject and object, satire and humor are in the opposing position, and the concept of irony can be grasped as the flexible, intermediate form that flows between the two extremes. And paradox, cynicism, wit, ridicule, sarcasm, etc. can be understood as the sub-concept dependent on three basic categories and concrete ways to be mobilized when three individual forms are realized through actual literary texts.

Abstract

The ultimate goal of this study is to define the principle of comedy and to deepen the debate by describing the lineage of Korean comic novels and by considering aspects of their development. The concept of ‘comic’is derived from the word ‘comedy’ which is a sub-genre of drama,contrasting concepts of tragedy. On the other hand, the definition of terms and concepts should be general and flexible in order to obtain agreement among its users in the level of compliance and universal validity. I would like to define ‘the comic’ in this paper as comic qualities which ‘cause laughter to the subject.’ I do not define the comic as the subjective and objective at the level of micro-layers but as ‘the interaction of subjects and object’ at the level of comprehension. According to this view, the comic can be redefined as “properties and qualities that cause the subject laughter in the interaction between subject and object.” As a subcategory of ‘the comic’, the concepts of satire and humor, irony, and their mutual relationships between the concepts are as follows. In the relation of subject(X) and object(Y), the structure of satire is defined as that in which ‘X criticizes Y’, and the humorous as that in which ‘X reconcilies with Y.’ In contrast, irony is defined as tension and the reflective sense of distance. Based on the relationship between subject and object, satire and humor are in the opposing position, and the concept of irony can be grasped as the flexible, intermediate form that flows between the two extremes. And paradox, cynicism, wit, ridicule, sarcasm, etc. can be understood as the sub-concept dependent on three basic categories and concrete ways to be mobilized when three individual forms are realized through actual literary texts.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 강두식, "F. Schlegel에 있어서의 Ironie 개념의 형성에 대한 연구", pp.1973
  2. 곽종원, "해학의 제 양상", 월간문학, 21(5월), pp.218~222 (1970)
  3. 구창환, "풍자 문학론고", 국어교육연구, pp.51~94 (1975), 조선대 사범대
  4. 국제 P. E. N클럽 한국본부, "동서문학의 해학", pp.530~545 (1970), 국제 P. E. N클럽 한국본부
  5. 김동욱, "한국문학에 있어서의 해학", 월간문학, 5(5월), pp.223~224 (1970)
  6. 김열규, "한국문학에 있어서의 해학", 국어국문학, 51, pp.116~ (1971)
  7. 김인환, "희극적 소설의 구조원리", pp.1~206 (1981), 고려대 대학원
  8. 김준오, "30년대 풍자 문학론, In 한국현대쟝르비평론", pp.238~239 (1990), 문학과지성사
  9. 김중하, "풍자 문학론 서설", 국어국문학, 12, pp.37~ (1975), 부산대 국어국문학과
  10. 김지원, "해학과 풍자의 문학", pp.1~301 (1983), 문장사
  11. 류종영, "웃음의 미학", pp.1~73 (2005), 유로서적
  12. 백 철, "해학의 이것과 저것", 월간문학, (5월), pp.254~255 (1970)
  13. 서라사, "문학에 있어서의 웃음의 개념", 국어국문학, 51, pp.114~ (1971)
  14. 서종택, "한국근대소설의 구조", pp.1~256 (1982), 시문학사
  15. 신동욱, "풍자소설고", 문학과지성, 32(여름), pp.328~336 (1971)
  16. 유병관, "한국 현대시의 풍자성 연구", pp.1~60 (1997), 성균관대 대학원
  17. 유승호, "한국현대소설의 구현원리로서 웃음의 미학적 특성과 의미", pp.2006
  18. 이두현, "한국문학의 풍자", 국어국문학, 51, pp.114~ (1971)
  19. 이어령, "해학의 미적 범주", 사상계, (11월), pp.284~295 (1958)
  20. 이유식, "전후의 한국 풍자시론", 현대문학, (5월), pp.259~265 (1963)
  21. 이인성, "몰리에르에 관한 한 연구", pp.1~78 (1992), 문학과지성사
  22. 이주홍, "해학 속의 한국문학", 월간문학, (5월), pp.230~237 (1970)
  23. 이재선, "풍자시론 서설", 청구대학논문집, 6, pp.39~54 (1963), 청구대학
  24. 이정탁, "한국풍자문학연구", pp.1~75 (1979), 이우출판사
  25. 임철규, "희극의 미학", 창작과비평, (겨울), pp.504~525 (1976)
  26. 임 화, "세태소설론", 동아일보, 4. 1- 4. 6, ~ (1938)
  27. 정인섭, "해학의 사상적 배경과 수사학", 월간문학, (5월), pp.238~245 (1970)
  28. 조건상, "한국현대골계소설연구", pp.1~30 (1985), 문학예술사
  29. 조동일, "미적 범주", 한국사상대계, 1, pp.473~478 (1973), 성대 대동문화연구원
  30. 조동일, "한국문학에 있어서의 골계", 국어국문학, 51, pp.117~ (1971)
  31. 정끝별, "한국 현대시의 패러디 연구", pp.1996
  32. 최일수, "우리의 익살과 서구의 풍자", 월간문학, (5월), pp.225~229 (1970)
  33. 최재서, "풍자문학론", 조선일보, 7. 14- 21, ~ (1935)
  34. 한 식, "풍자문학에 대하여", 동아일보, 2. 21, 23, 25, 27, ~ (1936)
  35. 홍기삼, "풍자와 간접화법", 문학사상, 30(15), pp.302~308 (1973)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)