식민지시기 수용된 일본어 도자공예 용어가 現도자공예 용어에 미친 영향
The influence of Japanese Ceramic Terminology in Japan's Colonial Era on the Korean Ceramic Terminology
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korean ceramic terminology is based on Japanese ceramic terminology that was flowed in the colonial era of Korea. Japanese ceramic terminology transformed Korean ceramic into museum collections, and represented Japanese cultural superiority over Korean. As a result, ceramic terminology, framed as a nobel and elevated art terminology, have been accepted without any resistance after the independence from colonization. In fact, 83.58% of ceramic terminology in the colonial era of Korea are still used nowadays, and people have used the naming rule of ceramic relics, which was made in colonial era of Korea, till now. Japanese ceramic terminology would cause the problem, which is the interruption of communications, because the terminology is unfamiliar and difficult for Korean to understand. In spite of the difficulty and inconvenience, the authority of ceramic terminology, which have formed since Japanese imperialism, delays the reform of ceramic terminology. However, if the current ceramic terminology is not good enough in the communication, it is necessary to develop appropriate terminology for improving comprehension and delivering Korea culture and history.
Abstract
Korean ceramic terminology is based on Japanese ceramic terminology that was flowed in the colonial era of Korea. Japanese ceramic terminology transformed Korean ceramic into museum collections, and represented Japanese cultural superiority over Korean. As a result, ceramic terminology, framed as a nobel and elevated art terminology, have been accepted without any resistance after the independence from colonization. In fact, 83.58% of ceramic terminology in the colonial era of Korea are still used nowadays, and people have used the naming rule of ceramic relics, which was made in colonial era of Korea, till now. Japanese ceramic terminology would cause the problem, which is the interruption of communications, because the terminology is unfamiliar and difficult for Korean to understand. In spite of the difficulty and inconvenience, the authority of ceramic terminology, which have formed since Japanese imperialism, delays the reform of ceramic terminology. However, if the current ceramic terminology is not good enough in the communication, it is necessary to develop appropriate terminology for improving comprehension and delivering Korea culture and history.
참고문헌 (27)
- 교육과학기술부, "사회과 탐구 5-1", pp.67~ (2011), 두산동아
- 国立博物館, "国寶圖鑑", pp.84~191 (1957), 문교부 圖版
- 국립중앙박물관, "국립중앙박물관 100선", pp.176~177 (2011), 안그라픽스
- 국립중앙박물관, "한국 박물관 개관 100주년 기념 특별전", pp.22~97 (2009), 안그라픽스
- 국성하, "일제강점기 고적조사보존사업의 식민성 연구", 미래교육연구, 18(2), pp.1~29 (2005), 연세대학교교육연구소
- 김도형, "일제하 총독부 박물관 문서와 관리체계", 기록학연구, 3, pp.115~138 (2001), 한국기록학회
- 김현아, "도자공예 용어의 관람객 이해도와 소통력 향상 방안", 한국사전학, (24), pp.126~149 (2014), 한국사전학회
- 마샬 맥루한, "미디어의 이해", pp.23~44 (1997), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 박소현, "‘고려자기’는 어떻게 ‘미술’이 되었나- 식민지시대 ‘고려자기열광’과 이왕가박물관의 정치학", 사회연구, 7(1), pp.9~45 (2006), 한국사회조사연구소
- 박소현, "帝国의 趣味: 이왕가박물관과 일본의 박물관 정책에 대해", 美術史論壇, (18), pp.149~150 (2004), 한국미술연구소
- 유희성, "순자는 왜 이름을 중시하는가?", 범한철학, 40(1), pp.183~203 (2006), 범한철학회
- 이규호, "말의 힘", pp.96~98 (1994), 第一出版社
- 이동성, "하이데거의 현존재와 언어", 東西言論, 14, pp.73~98 (2011), 동서언론학회
- 이인범, "韓国 博物館制度의 起源과 性格", 美術史論壇, (14), pp.35~63 (2002), 한국미술연구소
- 전진성, "박물관의 탄생", pp.37~41 (2008), 살림
- 최경봉, "한글민주주의", pp.97~116 (2012), 책과함께
- 최석영, "조선총독부박물관의 출현과 ‘식민지적 기획’", 역사와 담론, 27, pp.93~125 (1999), 호서사학회
- 최정묵, "올바른 인식을 위한 荀子의 提言", 대동철학, (36), pp.41~59 (2006), 대동철학회
- 浅川巧, "朝鮮陶磁名考", pp.1~192 (1931), 朝鮮工藝刊行會
- 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮古蹟圖譜 十五", pp.2121~2300 (1935)
- 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮古蹟圖譜 八", pp.981~1150 (1928)
- 朴美貞, "植民地朝鮮の表象―植民地の学習と教育の｢テキスト｣としての非文字資料", 동아시아문화연구, (54), pp.139~172 (2013), 동아시아문화연구소
- 李王職, "李王家博物館所藏品写眞帖: 陶磁器之部", pp.1~203 (1932)
- "御苑縱覽의 規定", 皇城新聞, ~ (1909)
- "국립중앙박물관 1932년 ‘조선총독부박물관 문서’"[URL]
- "통계청 1930년 ‘행정구역/문맹여부/성별/내지인ㆍ조선인’"[URL]
- "국사편찬위원회 ‘조선왕조실록’"[URL]