베트남 北南朝의 科試 一考察
A study on the civil service examination of the North-South dynasty in Vietnam
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Compared to the Northern dynasty, holding 22 times of Confucian exams in 65 years of its era, the Southern dynasty was only able to have 7 Confucian exams in 60 years of its period. The most distinctive feature of the Northern dynasty’s Confucian exam is that it precisely carried out the exams every 3 years despite having sharp conflicts with the South. However, the conflict between the two dynasties resulted in poor education systems and also weakened the exam’s purpose which was to select outstanding individuals. In a situation where the North and the South were fighting over their existence, they were also pitting against each other on which dynasty has more legitimacy. Meanwhile, they both inherited the system of the early Le dynasty. Therefore, the regulations of the Confucian exams in both dynasties were exactly the same as those of the early Le dynasty. The Jin-Sa stele, a stele which recorded the names of graduates in the Confucian exam, could not be put up at that time because of the small space of the Confucian shrine and Guk-ja–gam (Vietnam’s first university) in Thang Long. The long term conflict between the two dynasties was also one of the reasons why the stele could not be put up at a proper time and gave credibility to the argument that the United Southern dynasty damaged some of the Northern steles later on. Since the Northern dynasty was established after the downfall of the later Le dynasty, its legitimacy was evidently not firm enough. To overcome this disadvantage, the Northern dynasty used Ha Noi’s political, economical, social, cultural, educational and geographical merits to their advantage and achieved a great improvement in the Confucian exam system. On the other hand, the southern dynasty surely was more superior in its legitimacy by restoring the later Le dynasty. However, its Confucian exam system could not develop as fully as the North because it was a local government lacking in many aspects. The superiority of the Confucian exam system of the North did not lead to its triumph over the South. Yet, we cannot affirm that the Confucian exam system is related to the North’s downfall. The reason why the North collapsed despite having a lot of good traits and conditions of its own was because the leader was careless about governing, indulged in sensual pleasures and luxurious parties.
Abstract
Compared to the Northern dynasty, holding 22 times of Confucian exams in 65 years of its era, the Southern dynasty was only able to have 7 Confucian exams in 60 years of its period. The most distinctive feature of the Northern dynasty’s Confucian exam is that it precisely carried out the exams every 3 years despite having sharp conflicts with the South. However, the conflict between the two dynasties resulted in poor education systems and also weakened the exam’s purpose which was to select outstanding individuals. In a situation where the North and the South were fighting over their existence, they were also pitting against each other on which dynasty has more legitimacy. Meanwhile, they both inherited the system of the early Le dynasty. Therefore, the regulations of the Confucian exams in both dynasties were exactly the same as those of the early Le dynasty. The Jin-Sa stele, a stele which recorded the names of graduates in the Confucian exam, could not be put up at that time because of the small space of the Confucian shrine and Guk-ja–gam (Vietnam’s first university) in Thang Long. The long term conflict between the two dynasties was also one of the reasons why the stele could not be put up at a proper time and gave credibility to the argument that the United Southern dynasty damaged some of the Northern steles later on. Since the Northern dynasty was established after the downfall of the later Le dynasty, its legitimacy was evidently not firm enough. To overcome this disadvantage, the Northern dynasty used Ha Noi’s political, economical, social, cultural, educational and geographical merits to their advantage and achieved a great improvement in the Confucian exam system. On the other hand, the southern dynasty surely was more superior in its legitimacy by restoring the later Le dynasty. However, its Confucian exam system could not develop as fully as the North because it was a local government lacking in many aspects. The superiority of the Confucian exam system of the North did not lead to its triumph over the South. Yet, we cannot affirm that the Confucian exam system is related to the North’s downfall. The reason why the North collapsed despite having a lot of good traits and conditions of its own was because the leader was careless about governing, indulged in sensual pleasures and luxurious parties.
참고문헌 (20)
- 송정남, "리왕조 科擧制度 一考察", 동남아연구, 20(2), pp.113~142 (2010), 동남아연구소
- 송정남, "쩐·호왕조의 敎育과 科試에 관한 硏究", 동남아연구, 23(1), pp.175~202 (2013), 동남아연구소
- 송정남, "베트남 역사 읽기" (2014), 한국외대 출판부
- 송정남, "베트남 레初의 敎育과 科試 一考察", 동남아연구, 24(3), pp.249~279 (2015), 동남아연구소
- Cao Xuân Dục, "國朝鄕科錄", Nxb TP HCM, ~ (1993)
- Đinh Văn Niên, "Thi cử, Học vị, Học hàm dưới các triều đại phong kiến Việt Nam, Nxb LĐ", ~ (2014)
- Đỗ Văn Ninh, "Quốc tử giám trí tuệ Việt", Nxb TN, ~ (1999)
- Hoàng Văn Lâu dịch và chú thích, "大越史記全書", TII, TIII, Nxb KHXH, ~ (1998)
- Lê Quý Đôn, "見聞小錄", Nxb KHXH, ~ (1977)
- Ngô Đức Thọ chủ biên, ""越南漢學科擧登科錄會要", Nxb VH. Nguyễn Khắc Thuần bản dịch", Nxb VH. Nguyễn Khắc Thuần bản dịch, hiệu dính và chú thích-Lê Quý Đôn, ~ (2006)
- viết, "大越通史", Nxb GD, ~ (2007)
- Nguyễn Q. Thắng, "Khoa cử và Giáo dục Việt Nam", Nxb VH, ~ (1998)
- Nguyễn Thế Long, "Nho học ở Việt Nam", Nxb GD, ~ (1995)
- Nguyễn Thúy Nga, "Nghiên cứu văn bản học Đăng khoa lục Việt Nam, Nxb VNCHN. Phan Huy Chú viết-Tổ biên dịch Viện Sử học Việt Nam biên dịch và", ~ (1990)
- Chú giải, "歷朝憲章類誌", Nxb SH, ~ (1961)
- Phan Huy Chú viết-Long Điền dịch và chú giải, "越南科擧略考", Nxb TT, ~ (1968)
- Phan Ngọc Liên, "Giáo dục và thi cử Việt Nam, Nxb TĐBK, Quốc sử quán viết-Tổ biên dịch Viện Sử học Việt Nam biên dịch và", ~ (2006)
- Chú giải, "『欽定越史痛鑑綱目』 TIV, TV, TIX, TX, TXII, TXIV, TXV", Nxb VSĐ, ~ (1957)
- Ta Ngọc Liễn chủ biên, "Lịch sử Việt Nam TIII", Nxb KHXH, ~ (2007)
- Trịnh Khắc Mạnh giới thiệu, biên dịch và chú thích, "越南進士題名碑", Nxb GD, ~ (2006)
