폴 리쾨르의 칸트 전유: 20세기 프랑스 반성철학의 정당성 확보를 위한 새로운 접근
Paul Ricoeur’s Appropriation of Kant: A New Approach to Ensuring the Legitimacy of 20th French Reflective Philosophy
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Kant’s philosophy has had a decisive effect on the formation of contemporary french philosophy. Particularly in the school system, where the tradition of french reflective philosophy continues, the influence of Kant is very important. But a meticulous study of this theme is not emphasized. So in this paper, I try to explicate the effect of Kant’s philosophy on french philosophy of twenties by showing a concrete example. French philosophy of the twenties performed tasks of thought without certainty as the foundation of modernity but the ambiguity of human life. Since the concrete life of the human do not represent clarity or distinctness but complexity as ambiguity, reflective philosophers such as Sartre or Merleau-Ponty focused on the concept of ambiguity. However, this approach had a problem, for it was bears brunt of anglo-saxon philosophical camp based on logical rigor. How should we then solve this problem? In this context, Paul Ricoeur tried to save the French reflective philosophy by using kant. In conclusion, I attempt to shed new light on traits of contemporary French philosophy and Kant.
Abstract
Kant’s philosophy has had a decisive effect on the formation of contemporary french philosophy. Particularly in the school system, where the tradition of french reflective philosophy continues, the influence of Kant is very important. But a meticulous study of this theme is not emphasized. So in this paper, I try to explicate the effect of Kant’s philosophy on french philosophy of twenties by showing a concrete example. French philosophy of the twenties performed tasks of thought without certainty as the foundation of modernity but the ambiguity of human life. Since the concrete life of the human do not represent clarity or distinctness but complexity as ambiguity, reflective philosophers such as Sartre or Merleau-Ponty focused on the concept of ambiguity. However, this approach had a problem, for it was bears brunt of anglo-saxon philosophical camp based on logical rigor. How should we then solve this problem? In this context, Paul Ricoeur tried to save the French reflective philosophy by using kant. In conclusion, I attempt to shed new light on traits of contemporary French philosophy and Kant.
참고문헌 (19)
- 강영안, "칸트의 형이상학과 표상적 사유" (2009), 서강대학교출판부
- 김성환, "17세기 자연 철학" (2008), 그린비
- 김영건, "하이데거와 분석철학 - 카르납, 로티, 비트겐슈타인 -", 철학논집, 23, pp.67~95 (2010), 철학연구소
- 신인섭, "메를로-퐁티와 시뮐라크르 현상학", 철학, (77), pp.169~194 (2003), 한국철학회
- 이상섭, "자기인식의 역설-고중세의 정신철학적 관점을 중심으로", 헤겔연구, (21), pp.229~264 (2007), 한국헤겔학회
- 주성호, "왜 메를로-퐁티는 신체의 현상학에서살의 존재론으로 이행하는가", 철학과 현상학 연구, (20), pp.6~136 (2003), 한국현상학회
- Descartes, René, "OEuvres de Descartes III (Janvier 1640—Juin 1643)" (1975), J. Vrin
- Descartes, René, "철학의 원리" (2002), 아카넷
- Deleuze, Gilles, "Qu’est-ce que la Philosophie?" (1991), Les Éditions de Minuit
- Henry, Michel, "L’essence de la manifestation" (1963), P.U.F.
- Kant, Immanuel, "순수이성비판 1・2" (2006), 아카넷
- Kant, Immanuel, "판단력 비판" (2009), 아카넷
- Lecercle, J. J., "Contemporary French Philosophy", pp.21~40 (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, "Nouveaux essais sur l’entendement humain(1765)" (1990), GF Flammarion
- Merleau-Ponty, Maurice, "Phénoménologie de la perception(1945)" (1976), Gallimard
- Ricoeur, Paul, "De l’interprétation : Essai sur Freud" (1965), Seuil
- Ricoeur, Paul, "Du texte à l’action" (1986), Seuil
- Sartre, Jean-Paul, "L'être et le néant(1943)" (1976), Gallimard
- Thévenaz, Pierre, "De Husserl a Merleau-Ponty: Qu’est-ce que la phénoménologie?" (1966), Editions. de la Baconniere