본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

'기’(氣)와 ‘리’(理)의 여행: 중국 고대 회화에서 들뢰즈의 영화철학까지

The Journey of the Concepts qi(氣) and li(理): From the Ancient Chinese Paintings to Deleuze’s Philosophy of the Cinema

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This article traces the journey of two Chinese concepts, qi(氣) and li(理), from the brushstrokes of ancient Chinese paintings to Deleuze’s philosophy of the cinema. Interestingly, these abstract concepts take a concrete form when translated into French. As we can see through François Cheng’s translation, qi turns into “souffles vitaux” (vital breaths), and li turns into “ligne d’univers” (line of universe). Henri Maldiney, a French phenomenological aesthetician, employs these Chinese concepts in order to develop an “aesthetics of rhythms” that focuses on the process itself in the artistic creation rather than its result. Thus, Maldiney’s aesthetics values the Chinese brush and its dynamic movement in East Asian art. These concepts allowed Deleuze to reformulate two forms of the action-image, namely the “big form” and the “small form,” in assigning the two East Asian concepts to them. He used these concepts to explain the structure of Japanese films, namely those of Kurosawa and Mizoguchi.

Abstract

This article traces the journey of two Chinese concepts, qi(氣) and li(理), from the brushstrokes of ancient Chinese paintings to Deleuze’s philosophy of the cinema. Interestingly, these abstract concepts take a concrete form when translated into French. As we can see through François Cheng’s translation, qi turns into “souffles vitaux” (vital breaths), and li turns into “ligne d’univers” (line of universe). Henri Maldiney, a French phenomenological aesthetician, employs these Chinese concepts in order to develop an “aesthetics of rhythms” that focuses on the process itself in the artistic creation rather than its result. Thus, Maldiney’s aesthetics values the Chinese brush and its dynamic movement in East Asian art. These concepts allowed Deleuze to reformulate two forms of the action-image, namely the “big form” and the “small form,” in assigning the two East Asian concepts to them. He used these concepts to explain the structure of Japanese films, namely those of Kurosawa and Mizoguchi.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 마이클 설리번, "중국미술사" (1999), 예경
  2. 임어당, "중국 미술 이론" (2002), 한명출판
  3. 장준석, "중국 회화사론" (2002), 학연문화사
  4. Cheng, François., "Vide et plein : le langage pictural chinois" (1979), Seuil
  5. Deleuze, Gilles, "Cinéma I : L’Image‐mouvement" (1983), Minuit
  6. Deleuze, Gilles, "Cinéma II : L'Image‐temps" (1985), Minuit
  7. Deleuze, Gilles, "Mille Plateaux" (1980), Minuit
  8. Deleuze, Gilles, "Qu'est-ce que la philosophie?" (1991), Minuit
  9. Deleuze, Gilles, "Le pli. Leibniz et le baroque" (1988), Minuit
  10. Gasquet, Joachim, "Cézanne" (1921), Bernheim
  11. Klee, Paul, "Théorie de l’art moderne" (1998), Gallimard
  12. Maldiney, Henri, "Regard, Parole" (1973), Espace
  13. Sauvagnargues, Anne, "Deleuze et l'art" (2005), PUF

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)