『다빈치 코드』와 페미니즘
Da Vinci Code and Feminism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses the feminist motive to the Da Vinci Code, an extremely popular novel by Dan Brown. His reinterpretation of historical Christianity is a radically feminist one because of four reasons: 1) the biblical God Yahweh (Jehovah) was a bisexual (hermaphroditic) God; 2) Jesus was the first “feminist” and was married to Mary Magdalene, who was intended by Jesus to be head of the Church rather than the apostle Peter; 3) the Emperor Constantine consolidated male power in the Church and collated the Bible; and 4) the Gnostic Gospels suggests a feminist origin of Christianity. I think that there is too little substance or documentation for Dan Brown’s “feminist” theory. In the Judeo-Christian tradition, the biblical God does not truly have gender, although he is represented as father, king, and husband, for he is not a physical creature that has male or female gender. There is no reliable document supporting the marriage of Jesus with a woman. Furthermore, there is no reason to believe Jesus a “feminist.” in the social context of the first century. It is not true that the Roman Emperor Constantine strengthened the male-dominated church. It is historically true that Constantine invited about 300 bishops from across the Roman Empire to the Council of Nicea (325 AD). But these bishops were already male, and women did not hold such positions. A common characteristic of Gnosticism is paternalism rather than feminism. Even if Brown’s feminist critique went the wrong way, the problems of paternalism in the Church should necessarily be examined through a genuinely biblical understanding of the Christian faith.
Abstract
This paper discusses the feminist motive to the Da Vinci Code, an extremely popular novel by Dan Brown. His reinterpretation of historical Christianity is a radically feminist one because of four reasons: 1) the biblical God Yahweh (Jehovah) was a bisexual (hermaphroditic) God; 2) Jesus was the first “feminist” and was married to Mary Magdalene, who was intended by Jesus to be head of the Church rather than the apostle Peter; 3) the Emperor Constantine consolidated male power in the Church and collated the Bible; and 4) the Gnostic Gospels suggests a feminist origin of Christianity. I think that there is too little substance or documentation for Dan Brown’s “feminist” theory. In the Judeo-Christian tradition, the biblical God does not truly have gender, although he is represented as father, king, and husband, for he is not a physical creature that has male or female gender. There is no reliable document supporting the marriage of Jesus with a woman. Furthermore, there is no reason to believe Jesus a “feminist.” in the social context of the first century. It is not true that the Roman Emperor Constantine strengthened the male-dominated church. It is historically true that Constantine invited about 300 bishops from across the Roman Empire to the Council of Nicea (325 AD). But these bishops were already male, and women did not hold such positions. A common characteristic of Gnosticism is paternalism rather than feminism. Even if Brown’s feminist critique went the wrong way, the problems of paternalism in the Church should necessarily be examined through a genuinely biblical understanding of the Christian faith.
참고문헌 (19)
- 댄 브라운, "다빈치 코드 1, 2" (2004), 대교베텔스만
- 라은성, "다 빈치 코드의 족보" (2005), 동이
- 류호준, "여성이여 영원하라. 하나님 나라와 교회와 여성" (2010), 대서
- 리처드 어베니스, "다빈치 코드에 숨은 거짓과 진실" (2004), 라이트 하우스
- 메리 위스너-헹크스, "젠더의 역사" (2006), 역사비평사
- 밴 르우윈, "신앙의 눈으로 본 남성과 여성" (1999), IVP
- 브레바드 S. 차일즈, "구약신학" (1998), 크리스챤다이제스트
- 어윈 루처, "다 빈치 코드 깨기" (2004), 규장
- 필립 샤프, "니케아 이전의 기독교(교회사전집 2)" (2004), 크리스챤다 이제스트
- Belezikian, Gilbert, "Beyond Sex Roles: What the Bible Says About a Woman's Place in Church and Family" (1985), Baker
- Braulik, G., "Die Neue Echter Bible" (1986), Echterverlag
- Brown, Dan, "The Da Vinci Code" (2003), Doubleday
- Grudem, Wayne, "Evangelical Feminism and Biblical Truth" (2004), Multnomah
- Levack, Brian P., "The Witch-Hunt in Early Modern Europe" (1987), Longman
- Rudolph, Kurt, "Gnosis" (1987), Harper
- Willis, Deborah, "Malevolent Nurture : Witch-Hunting and Maternal Power in Early Modern England" (1995), Cornell University Press
- Brown, Dan, "The Author" (2005), The Official Website of Dan Brown
- "Random House, Inc" (2011)[URL]
- "The Da Vinci Code" (2006)[URL]