본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Postmodern Da Vinci Code as a Counter-History: Fact/Fiction, Feminism, Conspiracy

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The Da Vinci Code is a thriller whose plot concerns the Holy Grail quest. In addition, its story focuses upon the early church, Gnosticism, mythology, symbology, and cryptography to reveal two different conspiracies. One is the eradication of the sacred feminine represented by Mary Magdalene. The other is the Opus Dei's cover-up operation of the royal bloodline of Jesus, which is protected and has secretly survived. This paper deals with how the early church worked on in the formation of Christian doctrine. On this issue, Dan Brown raises some doubts about the divinity of Jesus and his marriage to Mary Magdalene. Consequently, he attempts to create a counter-history of Christianity by fabricating the facts of the early church. After the discussion concerning Jesus, the issue of who Mary Magdalene was is examined to determine if she was the Holy Grail itself or a womb for the descendants of Jesus. Furthermore, she represents the sacred feminine in paganism. Here, Brown laments that Christianity has exterminated any trace of this. As his daring challenges may be the product of postmodernism, a few postmodern ingredients of the novel are dealt with together with the borderline between fact and fiction, the revival of the sacred feminine, and conspiracy theory. Those assumptions are closely related to postmodernism. In this context, The Da Vinci Code is a product of postmodern culture, and its popularity may take root in that culture. Consequently, if its huge popularity is taken into consideration, it is obvious that ordinary people want to read that kind of fiction. In this sense, The Da Vinci Code offers an exemplar for popular fiction in postmodern culture.

Abstract

The Da Vinci Code is a thriller whose plot concerns the Holy Grail quest. In addition, its story focuses upon the early church, Gnosticism, mythology, symbology, and cryptography to reveal two different conspiracies. One is the eradication of the sacred feminine represented by Mary Magdalene. The other is the Opus Dei's cover-up operation of the royal bloodline of Jesus, which is protected and has secretly survived. This paper deals with how the early church worked on in the formation of Christian doctrine. On this issue, Dan Brown raises some doubts about the divinity of Jesus and his marriage to Mary Magdalene. Consequently, he attempts to create a counter-history of Christianity by fabricating the facts of the early church. After the discussion concerning Jesus, the issue of who Mary Magdalene was is examined to determine if she was the Holy Grail itself or a womb for the descendants of Jesus. Furthermore, she represents the sacred feminine in paganism. Here, Brown laments that Christianity has exterminated any trace of this. As his daring challenges may be the product of postmodernism, a few postmodern ingredients of the novel are dealt with together with the borderline between fact and fiction, the revival of the sacred feminine, and conspiracy theory. Those assumptions are closely related to postmodernism. In this context, The Da Vinci Code is a product of postmodern culture, and its popularity may take root in that culture. Consequently, if its huge popularity is taken into consideration, it is obvious that ordinary people want to read that kind of fiction. In this sense, The Da Vinci Code offers an exemplar for popular fiction in postmodern culture.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Ankersmit, F.R., "Historiography and Postmodernism", History and Theory, 38(2), pp.137~153 (1989)
  2. Bock, Darrel L., "Breaking the Da Vinci Code" (2004), Nashville, Tennessee: Nelson
  3. Brown, Dan., "The Da Vinci Code" (2003), New York: Doubleday
  4. Couchman, David., "Dan Brown: What Can the Church Learn from the Pied Piper of Postmodernity", Evangel, 24(3), pp.71~75 (2006)
  5. "The Golden Legend or Lives of the Saints. Volume 4, ed. F. S. Ellis. First Edition, 1900; Reprinted, 1922, 1931. September 4/2007<"[URL]
  6. Demos, John., "Afterward: Notes from, and about, the History", Fiction Borderland, 2005, pp.9(2), 329~335
  7. Hagen, John D., Jr., "The Real Story of the Council of Nicea: St. Athanasius, Froto-like, Resisted the Arian Powers America. June 5-12", 18~21 (2006)
  8. "Mary Magdalene and the Kings of France/<"[URL]
  9. Kellmeyer, Steven., "Fact and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code" (2005), Peoria, IL
  10. Knight, Philip., "Dangerous Fiction: The Popularity of Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code", Stimulus, 14(4), pp.2~6 (2006)
  11. Liefeld, David R., "God's Word or Male Words? Postmodern Conspiracy Culture and Feminist Myths of Christian Origins", JETS, 48(3), pp.449~473 (2005)
  12. Lineham, Peter., "Da Vinci Conspiracies", Stimulus, 14(4), pp.29~33 (2006)
  13. "The Da Vinci Code: Sacred Sex and Betrayal of Feminism/<"[URL]
  14. Morris, Diane., "The Da Vinci Code as Myth", Stimulus, 14(4), pp.7~11 (2006)
  15. Newman, Sharan., "The Real History behind The Da Vinci Code" (2005), New York: Berkley
  16. Picknett, Lynn, "The Secret Code of Leonardo da Vinci", pp.211~221 (2004), New York: CDS
  17. Slotkin, Richard., "Fiction for the Purposes of History", Rethinking History, 9(2), pp.2~6 (2005)
  18. "The Da Vinci Code: The Attraction and the Context/<"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)