본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근대 일본의 신체와 정치: 스펜서의 ‘유기체’ 개념 수용 연구

Body and Politic in Modern Japan: The Transmission of Spencer’s “Organism” Concept to Japan

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Organicism has long been considered as a subcategory of social Darwinism. However, admitting that organicism is intimately connected with social Darwinism does not mean that there is any necessary connection between organicism and authoritarian or totalitarian discourse. These misunderstandings are based mainly on the belief that organicism cannot be compatible with individualism. This alleged incompatibility, however, rests on the confusion about the viewpoints on the body. It is the aim of this article to reexamine Spencer’s logic through the history of medicine. Cell theory can illustrate that independent units constitute the body in cooperation with other units without the centralization of control and the subjugation of the parts to the interests of the whole. In this view, the reception of the meaningn of organism in Japan cannot be irrelevant to the conception of the body in Japan. Consequently, organism and its Japanese equivalent, “yukitai” (有機體), cannot have the same meaning and the same result. When Spencer’s social organism was translated in modern Japan, Japanese translator agreed with Spencer that there is the same logic between the biological and social body. Nonetheless, Spencer’s organicism rather than his individualism was appropriated to support the introduction of the parliamentary system. This discrepancy may be based on the difference of the perspectives on the body.

Abstract

Organicism has long been considered as a subcategory of social Darwinism. However, admitting that organicism is intimately connected with social Darwinism does not mean that there is any necessary connection between organicism and authoritarian or totalitarian discourse. These misunderstandings are based mainly on the belief that organicism cannot be compatible with individualism. This alleged incompatibility, however, rests on the confusion about the viewpoints on the body. It is the aim of this article to reexamine Spencer’s logic through the history of medicine. Cell theory can illustrate that independent units constitute the body in cooperation with other units without the centralization of control and the subjugation of the parts to the interests of the whole. In this view, the reception of the meaningn of organism in Japan cannot be irrelevant to the conception of the body in Japan. Consequently, organism and its Japanese equivalent, “yukitai” (有機體), cannot have the same meaning and the same result. When Spencer’s social organism was translated in modern Japan, Japanese translator agreed with Spencer that there is the same logic between the biological and social body. Nonetheless, Spencer’s organicism rather than his individualism was appropriated to support the introduction of the parliamentary system. This discrepancy may be based on the difference of the perspectives on the body.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Baba, Tasseui, "Complete Works of Meiji Literature" (1973), Chikumashobo
  2. Cohen, I. Bernard, "Interactions: Some Contacts Between the Natural Sciences and the Social Sciences" (1994), MIT Press
  3. Gray, Tim S, "The Political Philosophy of Herbert Spencer: Individualism and Organicism" (1996), Avebury
  4. Hayashi, Makoto, "Cell Theory in Its Development and Inheritance in Meiji Era Japan", Historia Scientiarum, 8(2), pp.115~132 (1998)
  5. Howland, Douglas, "Translating the West: Language and Political Reason in Nineteenth-Century Japan" (2002), U of Hawaii P
  6. Otis, Laura, "Membranes: Metaphors of Invasion in Nineteenth-Century Literature, Science, and Politics" (1999), Johns Hopkins UP
  7. Schwartz, Benjamin, "In Search of Wealth and Power" (2006), Hangilsa
  8. Spencer, Herbert, "The Man Versus the State, with Six Essays on Government, Society, and Freedom", pp.383~434 (1884), Liberty Fund, Inc.
  9. Spencer, Herbert, "An Autobiography" (1904), D. Appleton and Company
  10. 波·斯邊鎖, "社会組織論" (1883), 松永保太郎;加藤正七
  11. つとむ, "語源海" (2005), 東京書籍
  12. 鈴木貞美, "生命観の探究―重層する危機のなかで" (2007), 作品社
  13. Temkin, Owsei, "The Double Face of Janus and Other Essays in the History of Medicin" (1977), Johns Hopkins UP
  14. 徳富蘇峰, "徳富蘇峰集" (1974), 筑摩書房
  15. Unschuld, Paul, "Was ist Medizin? Westliche und östliche Wege der Heilkunst" (2000), KungRee
  16. Vergata, Antonello La, "Biology as Society, Society as Biology: Metaphors" (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  17. 山下重一, "スペンサーと日本近代" (1983), 御茶の水書房
  18. 山下重一, "ハーバート·スペンサーの社会有機体", 国学院法学, 46(4), pp.135~183 (2009)
  19. 與那覇潤, "翻訳の政治学–近代東アジア世界の形成と日琉関係の変容" (2009), 岩波書店

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)