근대일본 ‘국문학연구’의 형성과 ‘문예’의 지식장: 오카자키 요시에의 ‘일본문예학’을 중심으로
The Formation of Modern Japanese “Study of National Literature” and the Intellectual Sphere of “Literature”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Japan, poetry and novel have been recognized as “Art” since the mid- 1880s. However, in the field of the “study of national literature,” it is after the 1920s that artistic value came to be established as a criteria for assessing literature. Mainstream academic methodology of the Department of National Literature at the Tokyo Imperial University, the stronghold of Japanese “study of national literature,” had its foundation in “Philologie.” On the other hand, the stance that set store on literature’s aesthetic value became founded as an academic methodology through the introduction of Deutsch “Literaturwissenschaft” in the 1920s, and the establishment of Okazaki Yosie’s “Japanese Literaturwissenschaft” in the 1930s. This science of literature that values “appreciation” made its appearance as a resistance to the empirical Philologie. But it would be a simplification to state that the two were constantly in opposition. In the 1930s, there was an attempt by scholars of philology to combine the “appreciation” concept of the Literaturwissenschaft with that of the objective method of philology. Okazaki Yosie himself, who was critical of ideological influence on literature, participated in an government-run academic movement led by philologists. Okazaki focused in analyzing the particularity of Japanese literature in the late-1930s, but shifted to emphasizing its “universality” in the 1940s. His claim was that the wait-and-see aesthetics of Japanese literature, as it did not favor severe strife and struggle, was “purer” than that of Western art. He saw the literature as essentially unrelated to the teleological point of view. His theory of Japanese Literature is considered to be an example of “aesthetic Japan-centrism” as separate from political Japancentrism.
Abstract
In Japan, poetry and novel have been recognized as “Art” since the mid- 1880s. However, in the field of the “study of national literature,” it is after the 1920s that artistic value came to be established as a criteria for assessing literature. Mainstream academic methodology of the Department of National Literature at the Tokyo Imperial University, the stronghold of Japanese “study of national literature,” had its foundation in “Philologie.” On the other hand, the stance that set store on literature’s aesthetic value became founded as an academic methodology through the introduction of Deutsch “Literaturwissenschaft” in the 1920s, and the establishment of Okazaki Yosie’s “Japanese Literaturwissenschaft” in the 1930s. This science of literature that values “appreciation” made its appearance as a resistance to the empirical Philologie. But it would be a simplification to state that the two were constantly in opposition. In the 1930s, there was an attempt by scholars of philology to combine the “appreciation” concept of the Literaturwissenschaft with that of the objective method of philology. Okazaki Yosie himself, who was critical of ideological influence on literature, participated in an government-run academic movement led by philologists. Okazaki focused in analyzing the particularity of Japanese literature in the late-1930s, but shifted to emphasizing its “universality” in the 1940s. His claim was that the wait-and-see aesthetics of Japanese literature, as it did not favor severe strife and struggle, was “purer” than that of Western art. He saw the literature as essentially unrelated to the teleological point of view. His theory of Japanese Literature is considered to be an example of “aesthetic Japan-centrism” as separate from political Japancentrism.
참고문헌 (17)
- 芳賀矢一, "国文学史十講" (1899), 富山房
- 芳賀矢一, "芳賀矢一選集", pp.1~59 (1982), 国学院大学
- 濱下昌宏, "国文学からの美学(その1)―国学から岡崎義恵「日本文芸学」の生成まで", 文芸学研究, 11, pp.1~16 (2007)
- 久松潜一, "批評史の研究に就いて", 国語と国文学, 7, pp.1~25 (1936)
- 久松潜一, "国文学通論" (1944), 東京武蔵野書院
- 池田亀鑑, "対立より統一へ国文学研究及び国語教育の現状に対する小さき不満", 国語と国文学, 1, pp.1~24 (1927)
- 衣笠正晃, "一九三〇年代国文学研究ーいわゆる「文芸学論争」をめぐって", 言語と文化, 1, pp.11~31 (2004)
- 北澤憲昭, "境界の美術史–「美術」形成史ノート" (2000), ブリュッケ
- 小泉浩一郎, "昭和文学史", pp.25~33 (1988), 有精堂
- 三上参次, "日本文学史" (1890), 金港堂
- 岡崎義恵, "日本文芸学" (1935), 岩波書店
- 岡崎義恵, "日本文芸の様式" (1939), 岩波書店
- 岡崎義恵, "美の伝統" (1940), 弘文堂
- 岡崎義恵, "芸術論の探求" (1941), 岩波書店
- Sasanuma, Toshiaki, "国文学の思想" (2014), 어문학사
- Suzuki, Sadami, "日本の「文学」概念" (2001), 보고사
- Suzuki, Sadami, "日本の文化ナショナリズム" (2008), 소화
