러시아어 타동사의 무보어 용법과 타동성 연구
A Study on Russian Objectless Transitive Verbs and Transitivity
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The use of transitive verb with omitted patient argument (here by objectless transitive verbs) has been gradually expanding in the weakening syntactic relationship between sentences in modern Russian. Furthermore, the use of objectless transitive verbs is closely related to various linguistic phenomena such as absolute construction, labile verbs, and change in the case government model of verbs. The present paper classified the uses of objectless transitive verbs into the following categories: 1) contextual omission, 2) incorporation of the action with the object of action, and 3) omission of non-referential object of action. In the first two cases, the object of action can be restored through the context or the meaning of the verb. However, in the case of omission of non-referential object, the action has non-actual potential mood and cannot be referred to any specific referent. Due to the absence of an explicit object of action, the use of objectless transitive verbs loses transitivity at different levels therefore, it is related to reflexive verb, such as the typical sign for intransitivity in Russian. In the cases of contextual omission and incorporation of the action with the object, objectless transitive verbs are similar to ‘reflexive verbs that include the object of action.’ Reflexive verbs are intransitive verbs that cannot take an object of action, but this type of reflexive verbs incorporate the object of action that has a close relationship with the subject in their meanings. In the case of omission of non-referential object of action, the transitivity is most greatly weakened because the object of action cannot be deduced or restored, unlike the contextual omission or incorporation of the action with the object. When the non-referential object of action is omitted especially in non-actual situations, the actionality and transitivity of verb are reduced, and objectless transitive verbs can be used as an attribute. Thus, in this type of omission objectless transitive verbs are related to reflexive verbs, which indicate a permanent state of subject.
Abstract
The use of transitive verb with omitted patient argument (here by objectless transitive verbs) has been gradually expanding in the weakening syntactic relationship between sentences in modern Russian. Furthermore, the use of objectless transitive verbs is closely related to various linguistic phenomena such as absolute construction, labile verbs, and change in the case government model of verbs. The present paper classified the uses of objectless transitive verbs into the following categories: 1) contextual omission, 2) incorporation of the action with the object of action, and 3) omission of non-referential object of action. In the first two cases, the object of action can be restored through the context or the meaning of the verb. However, in the case of omission of non-referential object, the action has non-actual potential mood and cannot be referred to any specific referent. Due to the absence of an explicit object of action, the use of objectless transitive verbs loses transitivity at different levels therefore, it is related to reflexive verb, such as the typical sign for intransitivity in Russian. In the cases of contextual omission and incorporation of the action with the object, objectless transitive verbs are similar to ‘reflexive verbs that include the object of action.’ Reflexive verbs are intransitive verbs that cannot take an object of action, but this type of reflexive verbs incorporate the object of action that has a close relationship with the subject in their meanings. In the case of omission of non-referential object of action, the transitivity is most greatly weakened because the object of action cannot be deduced or restored, unlike the contextual omission or incorporation of the action with the object. When the non-referential object of action is omitted especially in non-actual situations, the actionality and transitivity of verb are reduced, and objectless transitive verbs can be used as an attribute. Thus, in this type of omission objectless transitive verbs are related to reflexive verbs, which indicate a permanent state of subject.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김형섭, "러시아어 타동사의 자동사화에 대한 고찰: -SJA 재귀동사를 중심으로", 러시아어문학연구논집, (50), pp.289~319 (2015), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
- 남혜현, "현대 러시아어 형태", 통사구조의 분석적 경향 고찰, 2012, pp.27(4), 191~224[DOI]
- 남혜현, "문법적 형태의 전위 연구: 러시아어 인칭대명사의 인칭", 수형태의 전위를 중심으로, 2013, pp.29(2), 131~159[DOI]
- 남혜현, "러시아어의 타동성 교체: 양용동사를 중심으로", 슬라브어 연구, 24(2), pp.159~174 (2019), 한국슬라브어학회[DOI]
- 송은지, "러시아어 SJA동사 상호구문(reciprocal construction) 연구", 슬라브학보, 24(2), pp.73~108 (2009), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회
- Chvany, Catherine, "Selected Essays of Catherine V. Chvany. Columbus", pp.161~171 (1996)
- Dixon, Robert, "Ergativity" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Hopper, Paul, "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56(2), pp.251~299 (1980)
- McShane, Marjorie, "Theory of Ellipsis", pp.2005
- Апресян, Ю. Д., "Проблемы типологии и общей лингвистики", pp.15~27 (2006)
- Ахапкина, Я. Э., "Труды Института русского языка им. В.В. Виноградова", pp.392~412 (2015)
- Ахманова, О. С., "Словарь лингвистических терминов" (1966), Советская энциклопедия
- Боброва, Г. А., "Вопросы структуры и функционирования русского языка" (1979), Издательство Томского университета
- Булыгина, Т. В., "Языковая концептуализация мира (на материале русской грамматики)" (1997), Языки русской культуры
- Виноградов, В.В., "Русский язык (Грамматическое учение о слове)" (1947), Учпедгиз
- Головин, Б. Н., "Ученые записки Вологодского пединститута, Т. 12", pp.367~397 (1953)
- Исаченко, А. В., "Морфология" (2003), Языки славянской культуры
- Кретов, А. А., "Материалы по русско-славянскому языкознанию, Том. 10", pp.162~168 (1978), Воронежский государственный университет
- Кустова, Г. И., "Типы производных значений и механизмы языкового расширения" (2004), Языки славянской культуры
- Летучий, А. Б., "Опущение прямого объекта и близкие процессы в арабском языке в сопоставлении с русским (на материале лингвистических корпусов)", Компьютерная лингвистика и интеллектуальные технологии. По материалам ежегодной Международной конференции“Диалог” (2010)
- "Переходность" (2014)[URL]
- Лютикова, Е. А., "Материалы к докладу на Ломоносовских чтениях" (2002), Наука
- Мельчук, И. А, "Типология пассивных конструкций. Диатезы и залоги", pp.343~361 (1974), Наука
- Мельчук, И. А., "Опыт теории лингвистических моделей “Смысл – Текст”" (1999), Языки русской культуры
- Муравенко, Е. В., "Глаголы со значением управления: утрата переходности", Филология, 51, pp.31~46 (2018), Вестник Томского государственного университета
- Норман, Б. Ю., "40 лет Санкт-Петербурской типологической школе", pp.394~406 (2004), Знак
- Падучева, Е. В., "Неопределенно-личное предложение и его подразумеваемый субъект", Вопросы языкознания, 1, pp.27~41 (2012)
- Потебня, А. А., "Из записок по русской грамматике. Т. 4" (1941), Учпедгиз
- Сай, С. С., "Прагматически обусловленные возвратные конструкции "опущенного объекта" в русском языке", Вопросы языкознания, 2, pp.75~91 (2007)
- Сигал, К. Я., "Сочинительный ряд как синтаксический контекст абсолютивного употребления переходного глагола", Филологические науки и вопросы теории и практики, 2(1), pp.157~160 (2018)
- Чурилова, Н. Н., "Синтаксис и норма", pp.196~203 (1974), Наука
- Шведова, Н. Ю., "Грамматика современного русского литературного языка" (1970), Наука
- Шведова, Н. Ю, "Русская грамматика" (1982)
- Янко-Триницкая Н. А., "Возвратные глаголы в современном русском языке" (1962), Издательство Академии наук СССР