본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

러시아어 감정 동사의 구조

The Structure of Emotion Verbs in Russian

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper analyzes argument (= "actant") structures of Russian emotion verbs from the theoretical position of dependency model. It presents transitive causative structure of emotion verb as <D1 : X = 'causer'/'cause'>−<D2 : Y = 'patient'>−(<D3 : Z = 'instrument'/'manner' /possible only with X = 'causer') (D = syntactic argument; X, Y, Z = semantic arguments). But the reflexive verbs derived from this structure by the postfixe -sja and the intransitives similar to them are characterized by the following structure: <D1 : X = 'author'>−<D2 : Y = 'intentional object'/'causer'/'cause'>−(D3 : Z = 'motive' /possible only with serdit'sja and other synonymous verbs and only if Y ≠ 'cause'). This is why, in Russian, the morpho-syntactical realization of D2 with reflexive and intransitive emotion verbs presents very diverse aspects. An exhaustive examination over such a diversity with reference to basic semantic classes of emotion verbs leads to the conclusion that a possible plurality of grammatical expressions concerning D2 of a given detransitive or intransitive emotion verb develops functional dynamism on semantic level; synonymous morpho-syntactical types of D2 within the government of the verb, on the one hand, constitute a fine-grained meaningful differentiation between them and, on the other hand, can be reduced to a simple redundancy according to various contexts.

Abstract

This paper analyzes argument (= "actant") structures of Russian emotion verbs from the theoretical position of dependency model. It presents transitive causative structure of emotion verb as <D1 : X = 'causer'/'cause'>−<D2 : Y = 'patient'>−(<D3 : Z = 'instrument'/'manner' /possible only with X = 'causer') (D = syntactic argument; X, Y, Z = semantic arguments). But the reflexive verbs derived from this structure by the postfixe -sja and the intransitives similar to them are characterized by the following structure: <D1 : X = 'author'>−<D2 : Y = 'intentional object'/'causer'/'cause'>−(D3 : Z = 'motive' /possible only with serdit'sja and other synonymous verbs and only if Y ≠ 'cause'). This is why, in Russian, the morpho-syntactical realization of D2 with reflexive and intransitive emotion verbs presents very diverse aspects. An exhaustive examination over such a diversity with reference to basic semantic classes of emotion verbs leads to the conclusion that a possible plurality of grammatical expressions concerning D2 of a given detransitive or intransitive emotion verb develops functional dynamism on semantic level; synonymous morpho-syntactical types of D2 within the government of the verb, on the one hand, constitute a fine-grained meaningful differentiation between them and, on the other hand, can be reduced to a simple redundancy according to various contexts.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 이기웅, "러시아어 동사의 논항값", 언어학, (34), pp.187~221 (2002), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  2. 이기웅, "감정과 언어 - 러시아어에서 ‘분노’에 대한 표현을 중심으로", 러시아어문학연구논집, (34), pp.175~201 (2010), 한국러시아문학회
  3. 정정원, "러시아어 감정술어의 의미와 통사적 결합가의 상관관계", 러시아어문학연구논집, (35), pp.171~200 (2010), 한국러시아문학회
  4. Апресян Ю. Д., "Новый объяснительный словарь синонимоврусского языка. Т. 1" (1999), Языки Русской Культуры
  5. Иорданская Л. Н., "Смысл и сочетаемость в словаре" (2007), Языки славянских культур
  6. Кривошеева И. В., "Структрные схемы русского простого предложения с глаголами эмоциональной деятельности", Воронеж. Диссерт. канд, ~ (1999)
  7. Мельчук И. А., "Опыт теории лингвистических моделей «смысл ⇔текст»" (1974), Наука
  8. Мельчук И. А., "Толково-комбинаторный словарьсовременного русского языка" (1984), Вена
  9. Степанов Ю. С., "Константы: Словарь русскойкультуры" (2004), Академический Проект
  10. Храковский В. С., "Проблемы теории грамматического залога" (1978), Наука
  11. Храковский В. С., "Залоговые конструксии в разноструктурныхязыках" (1981), Наука
  12. Heger, K., "Valenz, Diathese und Kasus", Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 82(1, pp.2) (1966), ~
  13. "TCLP VI (1936)", pp.Mouton, Selected Writings II
  14. Kövecses, Z., "Everyday Conceptions of Emotion" (1994), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  15. Mel'čuk, I., "Dependency Syntax" (1988), The SUNY Press
  16. Tesnière, L., "Eléments de syntaxe structurale" (1959), Klincksieck

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)