러시아 어휘의 타동성 발현 양상 연구: 러시아어 자동사의 비능격, 비대격 개념을 중심으로
A study on transitivity expressed in Russian vocabulary: focused on Russian unergative and unaccusative concept
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to provide accurate communication by examining the transitivity of Russian vocabulary. In order to reveal the transitivity, it is necessary to know the attribute of the agent, and to grasp the intention and discourse context. According to the actor's intention and causativity, intransitive verbs are classified as unergative and unaccusative verbs. Such a syntactic and semantic analysis as well as lexical analysis about transitivity need to be done at the same time. In this study, after the establishment of concept about unergativity, unaccusativity, the transitivity of Russian vocabulary is analyzed based on these factors. The subjects of the study are ‘(по)стучать’ and ‘(по)стучаться’. In order to clarify the meaning and properties of these vocabularies, it is necessary to study the authentic language data of Russian speakers. The research method is to adopt quantitative analysis method through corpus. This corpus analysis study has shown that there is a difference in the use of ‘(по)стучать’ and ‘(по)стучаться’. First, in the case of the ‘(по)стучать’ syntax, there were many expressions used together with the instrumental case. This reflects the actor's intentions and shows a high degree of transitivity. In addition, ‘(по)-стучать’ and ‘(по)стучаться’ has different collocation. In the case of ‘(по)-стучать’ ‘по’, and in the case of ‘(по)стучаться’ ‘к’ had a collocation relationship. Finally, the unergative and unaccusative categories are distinguished according to the influence of agent and causativity even in the case of typical unaccusative phrases.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provide accurate communication by examining the transitivity of Russian vocabulary. In order to reveal the transitivity, it is necessary to know the attribute of the agent, and to grasp the intention and discourse context. According to the actor's intention and causativity, intransitive verbs are classified as unergative and unaccusative verbs. Such a syntactic and semantic analysis as well as lexical analysis about transitivity need to be done at the same time. In this study, after the establishment of concept about unergativity, unaccusativity, the transitivity of Russian vocabulary is analyzed based on these factors. The subjects of the study are ‘(по)стучать’ and ‘(по)стучаться’. In order to clarify the meaning and properties of these vocabularies, it is necessary to study the authentic language data of Russian speakers. The research method is to adopt quantitative analysis method through corpus. This corpus analysis study has shown that there is a difference in the use of ‘(по)стучать’ and ‘(по)стучаться’. First, in the case of the ‘(по)стучать’ syntax, there were many expressions used together with the instrumental case. This reflects the actor's intentions and shows a high degree of transitivity. In addition, ‘(по)-стучать’ and ‘(по)стучаться’ has different collocation. In the case of ‘(по)-стучать’ ‘по’, and in the case of ‘(по)стучаться’ ‘к’ had a collocation relationship. Finally, the unergative and unaccusative categories are distinguished according to the influence of agent and causativity even in the case of typical unaccusative phrases.
참고문헌 (22)
- 권경원, "비대격동사와 비능격동사에 대한 의미론적 분석", 현대영어영문학, 50(4), pp.173~197 (2006), 한국현대영어영문학회
- 김형섭, "러시아어 타동사의 자동사화에 대한 고찰: -SJA 재귀동사를 중심으로", 러시아어문학연구논집, (50), pp.289~319 (2015), 한국러시아문학회[DOI]
- 남승호, "한국어 술어의 사건 구조와 논항 구조" (2007), 서울대학교 규장각한국학연구원
- 민현식, "인지 문법의 타동성 모형", 논문집, 14, pp.15~34 (2008)
- 양정석, "국어 동사의 의미 분석과 연결이론" (1995), 박이정출판사
- 양창열, "러시아어의 여격 명사구는 모두 논항인가?: '소유'를 나타내는 여격 명사구를 중심으로", 슬라브학보, 16(2), pp.1~25 (2001)
- 연재훈, "타동성의 정의를 위한 원형이론적 접근", 언어, 22, pp.107~132 (1997)
- 우형식, "국어 타동구문의 구조 분석(1) : 구성 성분의 통합관계를 중심으로", 외대논집, 10, pp.385~419 (1992)
- 이은순, "러시아어 비대격동사와 비능격동사구문 특성연구", 노어노문학, 11(2), pp.227~253 (1999)
- Borovikoff, N., "Unaccusativity and movement in Russian: integrating formal syntax and discourse functions", Ph.D, pp.2001
- Bruzio, L., "Italian Syntax: A Government Binding Approach" (1986), Reidel
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Ergativity", Language, 5(1), pp.59~138 (1979)
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Eargativity" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Dowty, D., "Word meaning and Montague grammar" (1991), Kluwer Academic publ
- Foley, W., "Semantic parameters and the unaccusative split in the Austronesian language family", Studies in Language, 29(2), pp.385~430 (2005)
- Fowler, G., "The Syntax of the Genitive Case in Russian", Ph.D, pp.1987
- Hopper, P, "Transitivity in grammar and discourse", Language, 56(2), pp.251~299 (1980)
- Jespersen, O., "A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles Part Ⅲ" (1949), George Allen & Unwin Ltd
- Kuno, S, "Functional Constraints in Grammar on the Unergative-unaccusative Distinction" (2004), John Benjamins Pub
- Levin, B., "Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" (1995), MIT Press
- Perlmutter, D., "Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis", Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.157~189 (1978)
- Shaumyan, S., "A Semiotic Theory of Language" (1987), Indiana U Press