러시아어 동사의 논항 실현에서 피영향성 분석
Analysis of the Affectedness in the Arguements Realization of Russian Verbs
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzed arguments of Russian verbs and established the measurement criteria. When affectedness is a measurable property, the most important concept is specificity. This specificity can be explained in terms of three criteria: telicity, accompanying change, and ‘What happened to X is Y.’ From the respect of aspect, if the verb has the meaning of closing, the argument can be evaluated as highly affected. In addition, it is an important criterion whether the argument has actually changed due to the influence of the verb. Finally, ‘What happened to X is Y’ can be used to grasp that the argument of the verb has changed as the case progresses and has reached a state of outcome. In this study, in order to analyze the affectedness of Russian verbs, verbs in the form of '-еть' were analyzed. The semantic structure between verbs and arguments was analyzed and classified according to quantized change, non-quantized change, potential change, and non-specific change. Added criteria for the Russian '-еть' verb. First, the argument x was divided into xani and x-ani according to the presence of animacy. In addition, it was revealed that it is necessary to include sentence components having limited meanings such as quantity expressions in the syntactic dimension. Finally, since the universally existing agent is not specified in the sentence, it was revealed that there is a need to reflect these characteristics.
Abstract
This study analyzed arguments of Russian verbs and established the measurement criteria. When affectedness is a measurable property, the most important concept is specificity. This specificity can be explained in terms of three criteria: telicity, accompanying change, and ‘What happened to X is Y.’ From the respect of aspect, if the verb has the meaning of closing, the argument can be evaluated as highly affected. In addition, it is an important criterion whether the argument has actually changed due to the influence of the verb. Finally, ‘What happened to X is Y’ can be used to grasp that the argument of the verb has changed as the case progresses and has reached a state of outcome. In this study, in order to analyze the affectedness of Russian verbs, verbs in the form of '-еть' were analyzed. The semantic structure between verbs and arguments was analyzed and classified according to quantized change, non-quantized change, potential change, and non-specific change. Added criteria for the Russian '-еть' verb. First, the argument x was divided into xani and x-ani according to the presence of animacy. In addition, it was revealed that it is necessary to include sentence components having limited meanings such as quantity expressions in the syntactic dimension. Finally, since the universally existing agent is not specified in the sentence, it was revealed that there is a need to reflect these characteristics.
참고문헌 (24)
- Ackerman F, "Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Dimensions of Causee Encodings", Linguistics and Philosophy, 22(1), pp.1~44 (1999)
- Anderson S.R, "Formal syntax", pp.361~378 (1977), Academic Press
- Anderson S. R, "On the Role of Deep Structure in Semantic Interpretation", Foundations of Language, 7, pp.387~396 (1971)
- Beavers J, "Argument", oblique Alternations and the Structure of Lexical Meaning, Stanford University, 2006
- Beavers J, "On Affectedness", Natural Language & Linguisict Theory, 29(2), pp.335~370 (2011)
- Condoravdi C, "The Middle: Where Semantics and Morphology Meet", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, pp.16~31 (1989)
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Adjective Classes: A Cross-Linguistic Typology" (2004), Oxford Univ. Press
- Dowty D, "Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection", Language, 67, pp.547~619 (1991)
- Dowty D, "Word Meaning and Montague Grammar" (1991), Kluwer Academic publ
- Gardiner D.B, "The Semantics of Russian Verbal Suffixes: A First Look", The Slavic and East European Journal, 23(3), pp.381~394 (1979)
- Hale, K., "Studies in Generative Approaches to Aspect", pp.41~57 (1988), Lexicon Project Center for Cognitive Science MIT
- Hopper P, "Transitivity in grammar and discourse", Language, 56(2), pp.251~299 (1980)
- Horav M. R., "The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors", pp.97~133 (1998), CSLI Publications
- Jackendoff R, "Semantic Structures" (1990), MIT Press
- Jaeggli O.A, "Passive", Linguistic Inquiry, 17(4), pp.587~622 (1986)
- Krifka M, "Lexical Matters", pp.29~53 (1992), CSLI Publications
- Levin B., "Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" (1995), MIT Press
- Paducheva E. V, "Telicity and Incremental Theme", Russian Linguistics, 33, pp.109~119 (2009)
- Perlmutter D, "Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis", Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.157~189 (1978)
- Roberts I, "The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects", 박사, pp.1985
- Tenny C, "Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-semantic Interface" (1994), Kluwer Academic
- Tenny C, "Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness", 박사, pp.1987
- Tsunoda T, "Split case-marking in verb-types and tense", aspect, Linguistics, pp.1981, 19[DOI]
- Vendler Z, "Linguistics in Philosophy", pp.97~121 (1967), Cornell Univ. Press