러시아어 타동사의 자동사화에 대한 고찰: -SJA 재귀동사를 중심으로
An Analysis on Detransitivization of Russian Verbs: With Special Attention to –SJA Verbs
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates the process of detransitivization of transitive verbs in Russian. Transitive verbs, being two-place verbs, have external and internal arguments, while intransitive verbs have one external argument. The derivation of passive, antipassive, anticausative, and middle constructions presupposes transitivity within the functional projection of little vP, which is closely related to agentive theta-role and accusative case assignment in syntactic operations. Reflexive postfix –sja in Russian plays an important role in discarding transitivity, that is, Russian postfix –sja is employed to make passive, anticausative, antipassive, and middle constructions. Consequently, the Russian reflexive postfix –sja is syncretic in function and meaning. Intransitive verbs divides into two groups: unergative and unaccusative. Pure reflexives indicating self-reflexives and reciprocals, antipassive belong to unergarive group whereas passive, anticausative, and middle belong to unaccusative. Russian passives are formed from imperfective verbs with the assistance of reflexive postfix –sja and from perfective verbs with the analytic form of 'быть+past passive participle'. As English middles, Russian middles are interpreted into generic reading and potential reading, but not episodic reading. Russian middles are also formulated by reflexive postfix –sja, which is utilized to make anticausative, passive, and antipassive. Russian middles belong to type II that morphological marking is used for middles. Moreover, they also have the characteristics of type I, which requires the mandatory use of adverbs, so-called, adverbial middles. The structure of Russian middels is [S VMIDDLE+SJA *(ADV) )(*NPINSTR)], which is different from the structure of unergative of [S VUNERGATIVE+SJA (ADV) (*NPINSTR)]. Anticausative is a type of verb which also decreases the valency of argument structure by removing CAUSER argument, which can be optionally used by 'ot+NP'. In this case, NP msut be EVENT type NP, but not ENTITY type NP. Antipassive is also formed with postfix –sja. This research encompasses the analysis on syntactic and semantic structure of detransitivized intransitives from transitive verbs, typological study, and language-universals & specifics on passive, anticausative, antipassive, and middle constructions from a perspective of morphology, syntax, and semantics.
Abstract
This study investigates the process of detransitivization of transitive verbs in Russian. Transitive verbs, being two-place verbs, have external and internal arguments, while intransitive verbs have one external argument. The derivation of passive, antipassive, anticausative, and middle constructions presupposes transitivity within the functional projection of little vP, which is closely related to agentive theta-role and accusative case assignment in syntactic operations. Reflexive postfix –sja in Russian plays an important role in discarding transitivity, that is, Russian postfix –sja is employed to make passive, anticausative, antipassive, and middle constructions. Consequently, the Russian reflexive postfix –sja is syncretic in function and meaning. Intransitive verbs divides into two groups: unergative and unaccusative. Pure reflexives indicating self-reflexives and reciprocals, antipassive belong to unergarive group whereas passive, anticausative, and middle belong to unaccusative. Russian passives are formed from imperfective verbs with the assistance of reflexive postfix –sja and from perfective verbs with the analytic form of 'быть+past passive participle'. As English middles, Russian middles are interpreted into generic reading and potential reading, but not episodic reading. Russian middles are also formulated by reflexive postfix –sja, which is utilized to make anticausative, passive, and antipassive. Russian middles belong to type II that morphological marking is used for middles. Moreover, they also have the characteristics of type I, which requires the mandatory use of adverbs, so-called, adverbial middles. The structure of Russian middels is [S VMIDDLE+SJA *(ADV) )(*NPINSTR)], which is different from the structure of unergative of [S VUNERGATIVE+SJA (ADV) (*NPINSTR)]. Anticausative is a type of verb which also decreases the valency of argument structure by removing CAUSER argument, which can be optionally used by 'ot+NP'. In this case, NP msut be EVENT type NP, but not ENTITY type NP. Antipassive is also formed with postfix –sja. This research encompasses the analysis on syntactic and semantic structure of detransitivized intransitives from transitive verbs, typological study, and language-universals & specifics on passive, anticausative, antipassive, and middle constructions from a perspective of morphology, syntax, and semantics.
참고문헌 (32)
- 강명윤, "촘스키 언어학 사전" (1998), 한신문화사
- 이영준, "자동사 파생 과정에서 의미 변화 연구 - 한국어와 러시아어 비교 -", 한국어 의미학, 34, pp.295~318 (2011), 한국어의미학회
- 이은순, "러시아 비대격동사와 비능격동사구문 특성언구", 노어노문학, 11(2), pp.227~253 (1999)
- Виноградов, В, "Русский Язык: Грамматическое Учение О Слове" (1972), Высшая школа
- Исаченко, А., "Грамматический Строй Русского Языка ВСопоставлении С Словацким. Морфология. Часть 1, 2", Litres (2014)
- Норман, Б. Ю., "Переходность, Залог, Возвратность: На МатериалеБолгарского И Других Славянских Языков" (1972), БГУ
- Храковский, В. С., "Проблемы теорииграмматического залога", pp.50~61 (1978), Наука
- Шведова, Н. Ю., "Русская Грамматика. Т. 1", ~ (1980)
- Янко-Триницкая, Н. А., "Возвратные Глаголы В Современном РусскомЯзыке" (1962), Изд-во Академии наук СССР
- Ackema, P., "The Middle Construction and the Syntax-Semantics Interface", Lingua, 93(1), pp.59~90 (1994)
- Adger, D, "Core Syntax : A Minimalist Approach" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Babby, L. H., "A Transformational Analysis of Transitive-Sja Verbs in Russian", Lingua, 35(3), pp.297~332 (1975)
- Babby, L. H., "The Syntax of Voice in Russian", Language, pp.342~367 (1975)
- Babby, L. H., "Voice and Diathesis in Slavic", Position paper presented at the Workshop on Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax, Indiana University (1998)
- Burzio, L., "Italian syntax: A government-binding approach" (1986), Springer Science & Business Media
- Comrie, B., "Causative Verb Formation and Other Verb-Deriving Morphology", Language typology and syntactic description, 3, pp.309~348 (1985)
- Corbett, G., "The Slavonic Languages" (1993), Routledge
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Ergativity" (1994), Cambridge University Press
- Fellbaum, C., "The Middle Construction in French and English: A Comparative Study of Its Syntax and Semantics" (1989), Indiana University Linguistics Club Publications
- Fox, B. A., "Voice: Form and Function" (1994), John Benjamins Publishing
- Guhl, M., "Toward a Syntactic Analysis of Russian -Sja", Russian Linguistics, 34, pp.261~283 (2010)
- Hopper, P. J., "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, pp.251~299 (1980)
- Jones, C., "Conditions on the Formation of Middles in Russian", Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 18(2), pp.291~335 (2010)
- Kemmer, S., "The Middle Voice" (1993), John Benjamins Publishing
- Keyser, S. J., "On the Middle and Ergative Constructions in English", Linguistic inquiry, pp.381~416 (1984)
- Klaiman, M. H., "Grammatical Voice" (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Levin, B., "Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface" (1995), MIT press
- Marelj, M., "Middles and Argument Structure across Languages", 박사, pp.2004
- Paducheva, E. V., "Is There an 《annticausative》Component", Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 11(1), pp.173~198 (2003)
- Perlmutter, D., "Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis", Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.159~189 (1978)
- Polinsky, M., "Antipassive Constructions", The world atlas of language structures (2005)
- Wade, T., "A Comprehensive Russian Grammar" (2003), Blackwell