혁명의 기표와 기의― ‘리이저 대자보(李一哲大字報)’와 시대전환의 논리에 관한 고찰
The Signifier and the Signified of Revolution – Research on ‘Li Yizhe Big Character Poster’ and Its Logic of Transition
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The results of the Cultural Revolution were devastating. Countless people died, and the system of the whole Chinese society had been destructed. After these catastrophic disaster, some Chinese intellectuals had come to know that the class struggle, which means that the proletariat should exterminate their class enemy bourgeois, led their society to that catastrophic state, then they finally started to reflect on the fundamental problems beneath the Cultural Revolution. As a result, some intellectuals, such as so called ‘the group of Li Yizhe’, whose member included Li Zhengtian, Guo Yiyang and Wang Xizhe, posted the big character poster(大字報) on the street of Guangdong Province. This poster’s title was “On Socialist Democracy and the Chinese Legal System.” In this poster, Li Yizhe group had fiercely criticized so called Lin Biao’s system and insisted that the real problem of Chinese Socialism was not the class struggle, but the re-construction of legal system. Then they offered the propositions to the CCP leaders. At first, Li Yizhe group’s purpose was integrated: the guarantee of citizen’s legal rights. But after the ‘April Fifth movement’, which was to venerate the death of prime minister Zhou Enlai, the perspectives about the task of Post Cultural Revolution had been ramified. Li Zhengtian, one of the member of Li Yizhe group, claimed that the most important task after the end of the Cultural Revolution was to overcome the dogmatic principle of Proletariat Dictatorship, and the independence of juridical branch. In other words, for Li Zhengtian, the main task of reform after the Cultural Revolution should be proceeded within the realm of CCP’s authority and legitimacy. On the other hand, however, Wang Xizhe, who was also the member of Li Yizhe group, claimed that the aim of the reform was to problematize the political system itself, so the legitimacy of CCP should become an political issue, then, Wang Xizhe proposed the need for the ‘general election.’ We could say that this difference between Li and Wang sharply showed the different attitude of the Li Yizhe group members toward the dictatorship and its legitimacy of CCP. The meaning of ‘Li Yizhe Big Character Post’ could be said as a knotenpunkt of the transition from the socialism China to the post socialism China. This article’s purpose is to read ‘Li Yizhe Big Character Post’ and the statements of Li Zhengtian and Wang Xizhe, then re―politicize the meaning of post socialism China.
Abstract
The results of the Cultural Revolution were devastating. Countless people died, and the system of the whole Chinese society had been destructed. After these catastrophic disaster, some Chinese intellectuals had come to know that the class struggle, which means that the proletariat should exterminate their class enemy bourgeois, led their society to that catastrophic state, then they finally started to reflect on the fundamental problems beneath the Cultural Revolution. As a result, some intellectuals, such as so called ‘the group of Li Yizhe’, whose member included Li Zhengtian, Guo Yiyang and Wang Xizhe, posted the big character poster(大字報) on the street of Guangdong Province. This poster’s title was “On Socialist Democracy and the Chinese Legal System.” In this poster, Li Yizhe group had fiercely criticized so called Lin Biao’s system and insisted that the real problem of Chinese Socialism was not the class struggle, but the re-construction of legal system. Then they offered the propositions to the CCP leaders. At first, Li Yizhe group’s purpose was integrated: the guarantee of citizen’s legal rights. But after the ‘April Fifth movement’, which was to venerate the death of prime minister Zhou Enlai, the perspectives about the task of Post Cultural Revolution had been ramified. Li Zhengtian, one of the member of Li Yizhe group, claimed that the most important task after the end of the Cultural Revolution was to overcome the dogmatic principle of Proletariat Dictatorship, and the independence of juridical branch. In other words, for Li Zhengtian, the main task of reform after the Cultural Revolution should be proceeded within the realm of CCP’s authority and legitimacy. On the other hand, however, Wang Xizhe, who was also the member of Li Yizhe group, claimed that the aim of the reform was to problematize the political system itself, so the legitimacy of CCP should become an political issue, then, Wang Xizhe proposed the need for the ‘general election.’ We could say that this difference between Li and Wang sharply showed the different attitude of the Li Yizhe group members toward the dictatorship and its legitimacy of CCP. The meaning of ‘Li Yizhe Big Character Post’ could be said as a knotenpunkt of the transition from the socialism China to the post socialism China. This article’s purpose is to read ‘Li Yizhe Big Character Post’ and the statements of Li Zhengtian and Wang Xizhe, then re―politicize the meaning of post socialism China.
참고문헌 (24)
- 柳世熙, "오늘의 中國大陸" (1984), 한길사
- 미셸 푸코, "지식의 고고학" (2002), 민음사
- 백승욱, "중국 문화대혁명과 정치의 아포리아" (2012), 그린비
- 슬라보에 지젝, "잃어버린 대의를 옹호하며" (2009), 그린비출판사
- 에르네스토 라클라우, "헤게모니와 사회주의 전략" (2012), 후마니타스
- 왕후이, "새로운 아시아를 상상한다" (2003), 창비
- 왕후이, "탈정치 시대의 정치" (2014), 돌베개
- 찰스 테일러, "근대의 사회적 상상" (2011), 이음
- 칼 슈미트, "정치적인 것의 개념" (2012), 살림출판사
- 2015, , ~
- 클로드 르포르, "19~20세기 정치적인 것에 대한 시론" (2015), 그린비
- Ban Wang, "Illuminations from the Past" (2004), Stanford University Press
- Anita Chan, "On Socialist Democracy and the Chinese Legal System" (1985), East Gate Books
- Arif Dirlik, "Marxism and the Chinese Experience" (1989), M. E. Sharpe Inc
- C. M. Hann, "Postsocialism" (2002), Routledge
- Alessandro Russo, "How did the Cultural Revolution End? The Last Dispute between Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping, 1975", Modern China, 39(3), pp.239~ (2013)
- Han Shaogong, "Why did the Cultural Revolution End?", Boundary, 2, 35(2) (2008)
- Lauri Paltemaa, "The Democracy Wall Movement, Marxist Revisionism, and the Variations on Socialist Democracy", Journal of Comtemporary China, 16, pp.53~ (2007)
- Samir Amin, "China 2013", Monthly Review, 64(10)
- Tang Tsou, "The Historical Change in Direction and Continuity with the Past", The China Quarterly, (98) (1984)
- 劉國凱, "人民文革論" (2006), 博大出版社
- 印紅標, "失蹤者的足跡" (2014), 香港中文大學出版社
- 香港中文大學學生會, "民主中華" (1986), 香港中文大學學生會⋅遠東事務評論社
- 中共中央文獻硏究室, "關於建國以來黨的若干歷史問題的決議" (1983), 人民出版社
