본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

19세기말∼20세기초 티베트의 군주론의 변용

The Change of Tibet’s Monarchy in late 19century to early 20century

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

After “Tufan” dynasty disappeared, many government substances that begun to occupy some region at Tibet, Tibet Buddhism reorganized Buddhist culture to Tibet society. On this circumstance, 13century the Mongol empire dominated Tibet. Since the Mongol empire's dominance, are the Tibetan Buddhist State sponsored by powerful external militant force was formed in Tibet. First of all Tibet Buddhism and external sponsor force should be considered for studying monarchy power of Tibet. As a real emperor who ruled the whole nation did not exist, Dalai Lama's are Tibetan Buddhist State as a main government. Dalai Lama's the Tibetan Buddhist State was not dominate force in political aspects. A religion-politics force, such as Dalai Lama or Panchen Lama, occupied the mainland of Tibet through the religious authority of Dalai Lama. Independent kingdom and self-government ruled the eastern, northeastern, western and southern except for the mainland. Substantial dominant force of Dalai Lama' central government generally didn't affect the whole of Tibet. According to this view, monarchy power of Tibet was the thing that controls wide region, however, the fact was that the power controlled very limited region. Since 1720s Tibet was sponsored by Qing dynasty, the Qing dynasty sent ambassador to Tibet for internal intervention. The western's shock, especially the British Empire's approaches stroke enormous shocks to Tibet that was subjected by Qing. The British Empire's approaches and extension of their force in Tibet of influence were regarded as threaten of Buddhist civilization. Change of monarchy power was inevitable to cope with powerful modern countries in Tibet. Dalai Lama 13th who ruled Tibet directly played an important role in change. He changed Tibet's sponsor from Qing to the British Empire in the competition of the British Empire, Qing and the Republican China. This is because Qing or the Republican China had not admitted relationship as an equivalent partner between Tibet and China, but they regarded the relationship as ruling and subjection. Then Dalai Lama 13th put an effort into domestic reform to dispersed pluralistically to centralized authoritarian form. Also, there was deep connection between the Panchen Lama the 9th's escaping from China in 1923 and this problem. Dalai Lama's reform often violated existing governments' autonomous rights, because of that Panchen Lama opposed to this aspect. Tibet in 1920s was still a kind of commonwealth consisted of anti-independent force. Although Dalai Lama 13th's effort to establish a modern nation obtained some results, there seemed to be some limitation to unify semi-independent force. Because Dalai Lama's foundation was a conservative Buddhist party and Tibet was still under influence China and England. Tibetan mainland could keep their country independent from 1912 to 1950. Two main reasons made it possible; one was England wanted Tibet's mainland to keep a neutral zone the other was the Republican China hadn’t done a positive policy to Tibet in its internal and external troubles and England's restraint.

Abstract

After “Tufan” dynasty disappeared, many government substances that begun to occupy some region at Tibet, Tibet Buddhism reorganized Buddhist culture to Tibet society. On this circumstance, 13century the Mongol empire dominated Tibet. Since the Mongol empire's dominance, are the Tibetan Buddhist State sponsored by powerful external militant force was formed in Tibet. First of all Tibet Buddhism and external sponsor force should be considered for studying monarchy power of Tibet. As a real emperor who ruled the whole nation did not exist, Dalai Lama's are Tibetan Buddhist State as a main government. Dalai Lama's the Tibetan Buddhist State was not dominate force in political aspects. A religion-politics force, such as Dalai Lama or Panchen Lama, occupied the mainland of Tibet through the religious authority of Dalai Lama. Independent kingdom and self-government ruled the eastern, northeastern, western and southern except for the mainland. Substantial dominant force of Dalai Lama' central government generally didn't affect the whole of Tibet. According to this view, monarchy power of Tibet was the thing that controls wide region, however, the fact was that the power controlled very limited region. Since 1720s Tibet was sponsored by Qing dynasty, the Qing dynasty sent ambassador to Tibet for internal intervention. The western's shock, especially the British Empire's approaches stroke enormous shocks to Tibet that was subjected by Qing. The British Empire's approaches and extension of their force in Tibet of influence were regarded as threaten of Buddhist civilization. Change of monarchy power was inevitable to cope with powerful modern countries in Tibet. Dalai Lama 13th who ruled Tibet directly played an important role in change. He changed Tibet's sponsor from Qing to the British Empire in the competition of the British Empire, Qing and the Republican China. This is because Qing or the Republican China had not admitted relationship as an equivalent partner between Tibet and China, but they regarded the relationship as ruling and subjection. Then Dalai Lama 13th put an effort into domestic reform to dispersed pluralistically to centralized authoritarian form. Also, there was deep connection between the Panchen Lama the 9th's escaping from China in 1923 and this problem. Dalai Lama's reform often violated existing governments' autonomous rights, because of that Panchen Lama opposed to this aspect. Tibet in 1920s was still a kind of commonwealth consisted of anti-independent force. Although Dalai Lama 13th's effort to establish a modern nation obtained some results, there seemed to be some limitation to unify semi-independent force. Because Dalai Lama's foundation was a conservative Buddhist party and Tibet was still under influence China and England. Tibetan mainland could keep their country independent from 1912 to 1950. Two main reasons made it possible; one was England wanted Tibet's mainland to keep a neutral zone the other was the Republican China hadn’t done a positive policy to Tibet in its internal and external troubles and England's restraint.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 加拿大, "現代西藏的誕生", pp.3~4 (1990), 中國藏學出版社
  2. 畢達克, "1728-1959 西藏的貴族和政府", pp.8~, 中國藏學出版社
  3. 英德, "西藏的歷代達賴喇嘛", pp.6~ (1991), 中國藏學出版社
  4. 阿旺洛桑嘉措, "五世達賴喇嘛傳", pp.5~ (1997), 中國藏學出版社
  5. Mayank Chhaya, "Man, Monk, Mystic", pp.24~, Doubleday
  6. R.A.슈타인, "티벳의 문화", pp.21~ (2004), 무우수
  7. Sir Charles Alfred Bell, "Portrait of the Dalai Lama" (1955), Human Relations Area Files
  8. 김한규, "티베트와 중국-그 역사적 관계에 대한 연구사적 이해" (2000), 소나무
  9. 丹珠昻奔, "歷輩達賴喇嘛與班禪額爾德尼年譜", pp.341~416 (1998), 中央民族大學出版社
  10. 서강대학교 동양사학연구실, "한중관계 2000년-동행과 공유의 역사-", pp.515~ (2008), 소나무
  11. 西藏自治區政協文史資料硏究委員會, "西藏文史資料選集", 第十三世達賴喇嘛年譜, 11, pp.1~ (1989), 民族出版社
  12. 西藏自治區政協文史資料硏究委員會, "西藏文史資料選集", 第十三世達賴喇嘛年譜, 11, pp.1~183, 民族出版社
  13. 牙含章, "達賴喇嘛傳" (1984), 人民出版社
  14. 王貴, "西藏歷史地位辨", pp.174~175 (1995), 民族出版社
  15. 이시하마 유미코, "티베트, 달라이 라마의 나라", pp.52~ (2007), 이산
  16. 周偉洲, "英國⋅俄國與中國西藏" (2000), 中國藏學出版社
  17. 畢達克, "1729-1959 西藏的貴族與政府" (1990), 中國藏學出版社
  18. 郭衛平, "淸季十三世達賴出走庫倫考", 西藏硏究, 3, pp.37~49 (1986)
  19. 格桑卓嗄, "十三世達賴喇嘛土丹嘉措是怎樣選定的", 中國藏學, 2, pp.151~159 (1991)
  20. -西康省 창건 과정(1903-1939)을 중심으로-, "박사", 서강대학교, 2001
  21. 韋剛, "評達賴十三世-土登嘉措", 西藏硏究, 2, pp.15~20 (1987)
  22. 次央, "淺談十三世達賴的新政措施", 西藏硏究, 3, pp.32~39 (1986)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)