본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

을미사변 후 고종의 國母復讎와 君主專制論

The Study on king kojong's revenge for stste mother queen myeongseong and ruling theory of despotic king after brutal assassination of queen myeongseong

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

in February 1897, king Kojong moved out of the Russian legation to the Kyŏngun Palace (today’s Tŏksu Palace). and in August king Kojong changed his reign name to Kwangmu (“Martial Brilliance”), and in October he proclaimed to the nation and the world the establishment of the independent “Great Han Empire.” and in August 1899, emperor Kojong proclaimed Constitution of the Daehan Empire, which expressed the political system of the Daehan Empire as despotic ruler system. then how could emperor Kojong make the Daehan Empire a state of despotic ruler system. This Paper studied those causes. first, emperor Kojong used revenge theory for state mother myeongseong, who were assassinated in 1895 by japanese assassinators. after the brutal assassination of Queen Myeongseong, the defending orthodoxy and rejecting heterodoxy faction rose against japan. they called themselves righteous army(義兵). they insisted doctrine of righteousness or moral duty theory, which described king and queen as state father and mother. they insisted revenge for Queen Myeongseong. in february 1896, King Kojong fled from kyungbokgung and went under Russian protection. in Russian legation, King Kojong supported revenge theory for stste mother Queen Myeongseong. revenge theory for stste mother Queen Myeongseong was based on the doctrine which claimed that king and queen should be heaven but subjects be earth. therefore, revenge theory for stste mother Queen Myeongseong could be used for strengthening royal authority. in february 18976, King Kojong went back to Gyeongungung Palace (Deoksugung Palace). King Kojong continuously supported revenge theory for Queen Myeongseong, and by that King Kojong could strengthen royal authority and become emperor. after all, in August 1897, King Kojong changed his reign name to Kwangmu (“Martial Brilliance”), and in October he proclaimed to the nation and the world the establishment of the independent “Great Han Empire.” of course, the political system of the Daehan Empire was despotic ruler system.

Abstract

in February 1897, king Kojong moved out of the Russian legation to the Kyŏngun Palace (today’s Tŏksu Palace). and in August king Kojong changed his reign name to Kwangmu (“Martial Brilliance”), and in October he proclaimed to the nation and the world the establishment of the independent “Great Han Empire.” and in August 1899, emperor Kojong proclaimed Constitution of the Daehan Empire, which expressed the political system of the Daehan Empire as despotic ruler system. then how could emperor Kojong make the Daehan Empire a state of despotic ruler system. This Paper studied those causes. first, emperor Kojong used revenge theory for state mother myeongseong, who were assassinated in 1895 by japanese assassinators. after the brutal assassination of Queen Myeongseong, the defending orthodoxy and rejecting heterodoxy faction rose against japan. they called themselves righteous army(義兵). they insisted doctrine of righteousness or moral duty theory, which described king and queen as state father and mother. they insisted revenge for Queen Myeongseong. in february 1896, King Kojong fled from kyungbokgung and went under Russian protection. in Russian legation, King Kojong supported revenge theory for stste mother Queen Myeongseong. revenge theory for stste mother Queen Myeongseong was based on the doctrine which claimed that king and queen should be heaven but subjects be earth. therefore, revenge theory for stste mother Queen Myeongseong could be used for strengthening royal authority. in february 18976, King Kojong went back to Gyeongungung Palace (Deoksugung Palace). King Kojong continuously supported revenge theory for Queen Myeongseong, and by that King Kojong could strengthen royal authority and become emperor. after all, in August 1897, King Kojong changed his reign name to Kwangmu (“Martial Brilliance”), and in October he proclaimed to the nation and the world the establishment of the independent “Great Han Empire.” of course, the political system of the Daehan Empire was despotic ruler system.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. "日省錄, 고종실록, 春秋公羊傳, 禮記, 春官通考, 大韓禮典, 景孝殿日記 (장서각 도서분류 2-2418)", ~
  2. 전봉덕, "大韓國國制의 制定과 기본사상", 법사학연구, (창간) (1974)
  3. 신용하, "獨立協會의 創立과 組織 in : 獨立協會硏究" (1976), 일조각
  4. 김상기, "조선말 갑오의병전쟁의 전개와 성격", 한국민족운동사연구, 3 (1989)
  5. 김상기, "갑오경장과 갑오을미의병", 국사관논총, 36 (1992)
  6. 강대덕, "華西 李恒老의 현실대응론과 춘천지역 前期義兵運動-개항전후 화서학파의 尊攘衛斥論과 을미의병활동분석-", 강원사학, 11 (1995)
  7. 서진교, "1899년 고종의 ‘大韓國國制’ 반포와 專制皇帝權의 추구", 한국근현대사연구, 5 (1996)
  8. 김상기, "갑오을미의병의 참여층과 擧義理念", 인하사학, 3 (1996)
  9. 오영섭, "춘천지역의 을미의병운동 in : 북한강유역의 유학사상" (1998), 한림대 아시아문화연구소
  10. 강창일, "삼국간섭과 을미사변", 한국사, 41, pp.38~43 (1999), 국사편찬위원회
  11. 신용하, "甲午改革과 獨立協會運動의 社會史" (2001), 서울대학교 출판부
  12. 신명호, "대한제국기의 御眞 제작", 조선시대사학보, 33 (2005)
  13. 민경식, "대한국 국제", 法學論文集, 31(1), pp.23~56 (2007), 법학연구원
  14. 이원택, "개화기 ‘禮治’로부터 ‘法治’로의 사상적 전환: 미완의 ‘大韓國國制體制’와 그 성격", 정치사상연구, 14(2), pp.60~83 (2008), 한국정치사상학회
  15. 김상기, "甲午乙未義兵 硏究", 박사, pp.1990
  16. 이민원, "아관파천 전후의 韓路關係-1895-1989-", 박사, pp.1994
  17. 최덕수, "19세기 후반 개화 개혁론의 구조와 전개-독힙협회를 중심으로-", 박사, pp.1995
  18. 이상찬, "1896년 의병의 정치적 성격", 박사, pp.1995
  19. 이윤상, "󰡔1894-1910년 재정제도의 운영과 변화", 박사, pp.1996
  20. 국사편찬위원회, "열강의 이권침탈과 독립협회", 한국사, 41 (1999)
  21. 양상현, "대한제국기 내장원", 박사, pp.1997
  22. 서진교, "대한제국기 고종의 황제권 강화정책연구", 박사, pp.1997
  23. 박민영, "대한제국기 의병연구" (1998), 한울
  24. "국권회복운동", 한국사, 43 (1999), 국사편찬위원회
  25. 김구, "백범일지", pp.91~92 (2001), 서문당
  26. 한영우, "명성황후와 대한제국", pp.39~82 (2001), 효형출판
  27. 이민원, "명성황후 시해와 아관파천", pp.83~107 (2002), 국학자료원
  28. 서영희, "대한제국 정치사연구", pp.2~19 (2003), 서울대학교 출판부
  29. 이태진, "고종황제 역사청문회" (2005), 푸른역사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)