活佛 轉世 제도와 근세 내륙아시아
The tulku tradition in the modern inner Asia
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since the Tibetan empire by the Yarlung dynasty Mahayana buddhism was first introduced to Tibet, and after the later dispensation Tibetan buddhism had been designated as the legitimate successor of the Indian buddhism, Mahayana-Vajrayana tradition. But the tulku tradition is very unique succession system of the dharma in the buddhism world, even though this tradition mixed with the mahākaruṇā of Bodhisattva, the transmigration and immortality of souls which form basic elements of the Mahayana buddhism. This tradition first appeared upon the tibetan society around the middle of 14th century when Rol pa'i rdo rje(1340-1383) had been designated as the incarnation tulku of Karma pagshi(1204-1283). Why did it happen after six centuries later since the buddhism had been disseminated into this society during the Tu-bo era? In this article I tried to explain the historical background of this tulku tradition in the inner asia includes Tibet and Mongolia, which had been related with the new political order under the legacy of the Mongol Empire. First, I tried to interpret the tulku(sprul sku) and the Qutuɤtu, both meaning the living buddha in Tibet and Mongolia. Based on the historical text, we can find related phrase like as “'phrul gyi lha btsan po” from the inscription of Tu-bo period and “qutuɤ” from The Secret History of Mongols, tulku and Qutuɤtu can be interpreted as “the divine being, the Holy”. So this evidence states that the holiness of tulku probably originated from the holiness and the supremacy of the tibetan emperor ‘btsan po’, traditionally considered as the descendants of Heaven from the old tibetan legends. This possible connection between the sacred and the secular realized during the era of Dalai lamaⅤ. Second, the tulku tradition appeared in Tibet and Mongolia during the 14th and 16th century separately, but there was some similarities of political backgrounds among them, reforming political order under the legacy of Mongol Empire. For example, the political supremacy of Jangchub gyeltsen(byang chub rgyal mtshan, 1302-1364) and Qalq-a Abadai Qaɤan (1554-1588), both the incarnation of Vajrapāṇi, related to the establishment of the tulku tradition in Tibet and Mongolia. Third, even though the tulku tradition had been appeared in Tibet around the 14th century, but the spread of this system throughout the whole tibetan society and wide inner asia had been waited until the designation of Dalai Lama Ⅳ, great-grandson of Altan Qaɤan during the 16th century. This great historical influence by the tulku tradition has been attributed to reorganization for the new political order among the Mongols, so there were several eminent tulku lineages in Mongolia borne in the Borjigins.
Abstract
Since the Tibetan empire by the Yarlung dynasty Mahayana buddhism was first introduced to Tibet, and after the later dispensation Tibetan buddhism had been designated as the legitimate successor of the Indian buddhism, Mahayana-Vajrayana tradition. But the tulku tradition is very unique succession system of the dharma in the buddhism world, even though this tradition mixed with the mahākaruṇā of Bodhisattva, the transmigration and immortality of souls which form basic elements of the Mahayana buddhism. This tradition first appeared upon the tibetan society around the middle of 14th century when Rol pa'i rdo rje(1340-1383) had been designated as the incarnation tulku of Karma pagshi(1204-1283). Why did it happen after six centuries later since the buddhism had been disseminated into this society during the Tu-bo era? In this article I tried to explain the historical background of this tulku tradition in the inner asia includes Tibet and Mongolia, which had been related with the new political order under the legacy of the Mongol Empire. First, I tried to interpret the tulku(sprul sku) and the Qutuɤtu, both meaning the living buddha in Tibet and Mongolia. Based on the historical text, we can find related phrase like as “'phrul gyi lha btsan po” from the inscription of Tu-bo period and “qutuɤ” from The Secret History of Mongols, tulku and Qutuɤtu can be interpreted as “the divine being, the Holy”. So this evidence states that the holiness of tulku probably originated from the holiness and the supremacy of the tibetan emperor ‘btsan po’, traditionally considered as the descendants of Heaven from the old tibetan legends. This possible connection between the sacred and the secular realized during the era of Dalai lamaⅤ. Second, the tulku tradition appeared in Tibet and Mongolia during the 14th and 16th century separately, but there was some similarities of political backgrounds among them, reforming political order under the legacy of Mongol Empire. For example, the political supremacy of Jangchub gyeltsen(byang chub rgyal mtshan, 1302-1364) and Qalq-a Abadai Qaɤan (1554-1588), both the incarnation of Vajrapāṇi, related to the establishment of the tulku tradition in Tibet and Mongolia. Third, even though the tulku tradition had been appeared in Tibet around the 14th century, but the spread of this system throughout the whole tibetan society and wide inner asia had been waited until the designation of Dalai Lama Ⅳ, great-grandson of Altan Qaɤan during the 16th century. This great historical influence by the tulku tradition has been attributed to reorganization for the new political order among the Mongols, so there were several eminent tulku lineages in Mongolia borne in the Borjigins.
참고문헌 (29)
- 烏蘭, "蒙古源流”硏究" (2000), 遼寧民族出版社
- 班欽, "新紅史" (1984), 西藏人民出版社
- 蔡巴, "紅史" (1988), 西藏人民出版社
- 陳慶英, "五世達賴喇嘛自傳 雲裳", 全國圖書 (1997), 館文獻縮微複製中心
- 陳慶英, "四世達賴喇嘛雲丹嘉措傳" (1992), 全國圖書館文獻縮微複製中心
- 智觀巴, "安多政敎史" (1989), 甘肅民族出版社
- 恰白, "西藏通史-松石寶串" (1996), 西藏社會科學院
- 丹珠昻奔, "論活佛 in : 活佛及轉世制度硏究 上" (2006), 中國藏學硏究中心宗敎硏究所
- 山口瑞鳳, "チベット 上" (1987), 東京大學出版會
- 山口瑞鳳, "チベット 下" (1988), 東京大學出版會
- 山口瑞鳳, "藏傳佛敎之活佛硏究 in : 活佛及轉世制度硏究 上" (2006), 中國藏學硏究中心宗敎硏究所
- 小沢重男, "元朝秘史蒙古語文法講義-附元朝秘史蒙古語辭典" (1993), 風間書房
- 金成修, "明淸之際藏傳佛敎在蒙古地區的傳播" (2006), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 김성수, "五世 달라이라마 北京行의 배경과 17세기 내륙아시아 네트워크", 명청사연구, (29), pp.115~158 (2008), 명청사학회
- 김성수, "티벳 전통사회에서의 사원과 “티벳불교 문화권”의 형성 - 겔룩 교단 사원의 내륙아시아 傳敎를 중심으로 -", 몽골학, (21), pp.195~223 (2006), 한국몽골학회
- "Arban buyan-tu nom-un Čaɤan teüke" (2000), 內蒙古人民出版社
- "Life and Works of JibcundambaⅠ", Śata-piţaka Series, Indo-Asian literatures, 294 (1982), reproduces by Lokesh Chandra
- "Qalq-a mongɤul-un qan nomun vačirai batu abdai-bar kitad arban ɤurbaduɤar vanglai qan-u arban dörbedüger on-du yeke adistid-tu batu erdeni juu bayiɤuluɤsan darui öndür gegegen mangdaju adistidlan tedgümjilen ulamjilaɤsaɤar dörbedüger ačitudarqan čorji jirugči lobsangdangjin kiged ilangɤuy-a doluduɤarnomči čorji blam-a ülemji deligeregülün üileddejü yabugsan……", ~
- qaɤučin teüke debter bolai, "А.Д.Цендиной,История Эрдэни-Дзу,(Восточная литература)Р АН" (1999)
- Ṅag-dBaṅ Blo-bZaṅ rGya-mTSHo, "A History of Tibet, Translated from Tibetan by Zahiruddin Ahmad, Indiana University, Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies" (1995), Bloomington
- Fang Kuei Li, "A Study of the Old Tibetan Inscriptions" (1987), Institute of History and Philology Academia Sinica
- H. E. Richardson, "A Corpus of Early Tibetan Inscriptions" (1985), Royal Asiatic Society
- Bärlocher, Daniel, "Testimonies of Tibetan Tulkus, A Research among Reincarnate Buddhist Masters in Exile", Opuscula Tibetana
- "Arbeiten aus dem Tibet-Institut Rikon-Zürich", Fasc, 1 (1982)
- Elverskog, Johan, "Tibetocentrism, Religious Conversion and the Study of Mongolian Buddhism", The Mongolia-Tibet Interface, Proceedings of the Tenth Seminar of the IATS (2003), Brill's Tibetan Studies Library
- Kapstein, "The Tibetans" (2006), Blackwell
- Miller, Robert James, "Monasteries and Culture Change in Inner Mongolia" (1959), Asiatische Forschungen
- Shakapa Tsepon W.D., "The rise of Changchub Gyaltsen and the Phagmo Drupa Period" (1981), Bulletin of Tibetology
- Serruys, Henry, "A Genre of Oral Literature in Mongolia: The Addresses", Monumenta Serica, 31 (1974)
