“恐怕”的認識情態意義功能及其意義的主觀化歷程
The Epistemic Modality and Subjectivization of “Kongpa”（“恐怕”）
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
In Modern Chinese, “Kongpa”（恐怕） can be divided into two types: “Kongpa1” (Verb) and “Kongpa2” (Adverb), which can be distinguished by the Syntactic structure. “Kongpa2” can be divided into two types: “Kongpa2-1” and “Kongpa2-2”. “Kongpa2-1” can express the speaker subject’s the apprehensional-epistemic modality about the proposition; however the “Kongpa2-2” can express the speaker subject’s the epistemic modality about the proposition. The differences between the “Kongpa2-1” and “Kongpa2-2” were resulted from two types of different Pragmatic Inferences: “Kongpa2-1” can be used to express the pragmatic inference in the resultant Clause and “Kongpa2-2” can be used to express the abductive inference in the causative Clause. The development from “Kongpa1” and “Kongpa2-1” to “Kongpa2-2” reflects the semantical evolvement and intersubjectification of “Kongpa”.
Abstract
In Modern Chinese, “Kongpa”（恐怕） can be divided into two types: “Kongpa1” (Verb) and “Kongpa2” (Adverb), which can be distinguished by the Syntactic structure. “Kongpa2” can be divided into two types: “Kongpa2-1” and “Kongpa2-2”. “Kongpa2-1” can express the speaker subject’s the apprehensional-epistemic modality about the proposition; however the “Kongpa2-2” can express the speaker subject’s the epistemic modality about the proposition. The differences between the “Kongpa2-1” and “Kongpa2-2” were resulted from two types of different Pragmatic Inferences: “Kongpa2-1” can be used to express the pragmatic inference in the resultant Clause and “Kongpa2-2” can be used to express the abductive inference in the causative Clause. The development from “Kongpa1” and “Kongpa2-1” to “Kongpa2-2” reflects the semantical evolvement and intersubjectification of “Kongpa”.
참고문헌 (12)
- Benveniste, E, "Problems in General Linguistics", pp.225~ (1971), University of Miami Press
- Edward Finegan, "Subjectivity and subjectivisation", pp.1~15 (1995), Cambridge University Press
- John Lyons, "Semantics", pp.793~823 (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Li Charles, "Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar", pp.221~ (1981), University of California Press
- Peirce C. S., "Philosophical Writings of Peirce", pp.150~156 (1955), Dover Books
- Schiffrin, D．, "The Principle of Intersubjectivity in Communication and Conversation", Semiotica, 1, pp.121~151 (1990)
- Traugott, E. C., "Regularity in Semantic Change", pp.24~ (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Traugott, E. C., "Motives for Language Change", pp.124~139 (2003), Cambridge University Press
- 貝羅貝, "漢語語法化研究", pp.55~ (2005), 商務印書館
- 沈家煊, "複句三域“行、知、言”", 中國語文, (3), pp.196~ (2003)
- 徐晶凝, "語氣助詞“吧”的情態解釋", 北京大學學報（哲學社會科學版）, (4), pp.143~148 (2003)
- 中國社會科學院語言所詞典編輯室, "現代漢語詞典", pp.782~ (2007), 商務印書館