助动词“应该”的情态解读及其宾语的选择限制
Selective Restriction of Verbal Objects and Modal Semantic Interpretation of Auxiliary Verb “Yinggai(应该)”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The auxiliary verb “Yinggai(应该)” could be interpreted either deontically or epistemically, and it has different “Selective Restriction” for its objects. For instance, when the verbal object consists of structures such as “subject-predicate structure, verb reduplication, predicate-complement structure of cohesive type, serial verb construction, Shuo(说)+X, Shi(是)+VP”, “Yinggai (应该)” is used for deontic modality. In contrast, when the verbal object consists of structures like “predicate-complement structure of combined type, Shi(是) + NP, Bu(不) + VP” or takes a tense-aspect marker, “Yinggai(应该)” is used for epistemic modality. According to our theory, there are some differences of the directing objects between these two modalities. On the one hand, because the directing object of deontic modality is “action”, it conceptually has “controllability” features. On the other hand, the directing object of epistemic modality is a “proposition”, so it has “process” features. Therefore, deontic modal’s “Yinggai(应该)” generally repels non-controllability events, epistemic modal’s “Yinggai(应该)” generally repels non-process events.
Abstract
The auxiliary verb “Yinggai(应该)” could be interpreted either deontically or epistemically, and it has different “Selective Restriction” for its objects. For instance, when the verbal object consists of structures such as “subject-predicate structure, verb reduplication, predicate-complement structure of cohesive type, serial verb construction, Shuo(说)+X, Shi(是)+VP”, “Yinggai (应该)” is used for deontic modality. In contrast, when the verbal object consists of structures like “predicate-complement structure of combined type, Shi(是) + NP, Bu(不) + VP” or takes a tense-aspect marker, “Yinggai(应该)” is used for epistemic modality. According to our theory, there are some differences of the directing objects between these two modalities. On the one hand, because the directing object of deontic modality is “action”, it conceptually has “controllability” features. On the other hand, the directing object of epistemic modality is a “proposition”, so it has “process” features. Therefore, deontic modal’s “Yinggai(应该)” generally repels non-controllability events, epistemic modal’s “Yinggai(应该)” generally repels non-process events.
참고문헌 (36)
- 蔡维天, "谈汉语模态词的分布与诠释之对应关系", 中国语文, (3), pp.208~221 (2010)
- 戴耀晶, "现代汉语时体系统研究" (1997), 浙江教育出版社
- 董秀芳, "“X说”的词汇化", 语言科学, (2) (2003)
- 郭 锐, "过程和非过程-汉语谓词性成分的两种外在时间类型", 中国语文, (3), pp.162~175 (1997)
- 何洪峰, "句法结构歧义成因的思考", 语言研究, (4), pp.26~31 (2003)
- 胡 波, "汉语情态助动词的提升与控制", 当代语言学, (2), pp.159~171 (2015)
- 李宇明, "动词重叠的若干句法问题", 中国语文, (2), pp.83~92 (1998)
- 李 明, "收录于吴福祥、洪波主编, ≪语法化与语法研究≫(一)", pp.350~370 (2003), 商务印书馆
- 陆俭明, "语义特征分析在汉语语法研究中的运用", 汉语学习, (1), pp.1~10 (1991)
- 陆萍, "试论“可以说”与“应该说”的异同", 语言教学与研究, (3), pp.79~86 (2015)
- 吕叔湘主编, "现代汉语八百词" (1980), 商务印书馆
- 木村英树, "关于补语性词尾“着", zhe, le, pp.”, 语文研究[DOI]
- 齐沪扬, "中国语言学报 第11期", pp.33~50 (2003), 商务印书馆
- 马庆株, "能源动词的连用", 语言研究, (1), pp.18~28 (1988)
- 彭利贞, "现代汉语情态研究" (2007), 中国社会科学出版社
- 沈家煊, "不对称和标记论" (1999), 江西教育出版社
- 王 伟, "情态动词“能”在交际过程中的义项呈现", 中国语文, (3), pp.238~246 (2000)
- 谢佳玲, "汉语的情态动词", 博士, pp.2002
- 熊 文, "论助动词的解释成分", 世界汉语教学, (4), pp.59~62 (1999)
- 徐晶凝, "现代汉语话语情态研究" (2007), 昆仑出版社
- 袁毓林, "现代汉语祈使句研究" (1993), 北京大学出版社
- 袁毓林, "＜论否定句的焦点、预设和辖域歧义", 中国语文, (2), pp.99~108 (2000)
- 张国宪, "双价形容词对语义结构的选择", 汉语学习, (4), pp.8~13 (1995)
- 中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室, "现代汉语词典" (2014), 商务印书馆
- 朱德熙, "语法讲义" (1982), 商务印书馆
- Alleton, Vivane, "honor of Willian SY. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change" (1994), Pyramid Press
- Allwood, Andersson, "Logic in Linguistics" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Butler, Jonny, "A Minimalist Treatment of Modality", Lingua, 113, pp.67~996 (2003)
- Bybee, Joan, "Modality in grammar and discourse" (1995), John Benjamins
- Coates, Jennifer, "The Semantics of Modal Auxiliaries" (1983), Croom Helm
- Droste, F. S., "Intention, meaning, interpretation", Lingua, 21, pp.126~134
- Halliday, M. A. K., "An introduction to functional grammar", Edward Arnold, ~ (1985)
- Lin, Jo-wang, "Modals as Verbs in Chinese: A GB Perspective", The Bulletin of Institute of History and Philology, 66, pp.53~105 (1995), Academia Sinica
- Lyons, John, "Semantics(Vol. 2)" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (1986), Cambridge University Press
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press