본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

明清禁毀小說政策及其影響

A Study on the Ming and Qing Fiction Prohibition and Destruction Policy

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Chinese fictions were influenced by political, economic, and cultural factors at the time of the Ming(明) and Qing(淸) Dynasties. Many of these fictions were prohibited by the government. Banning fictions was a means by which the Ming and Qing dynasties implemented cultural governance while the Qing government took it into extremes. We intend to base on previous research results and try to make a more comprehensive inspection on the policy of banning fictions in Ming and Qing dynasties. Generally speaking, the Qing government took an extreme approach, while the Ming government adopted a relatively lenient approach in banning fictions. The Ming and Qing fiction prohibition and destruction policy undoubtedly influenced the creation and publication of fictions, At a stage, Some fiction works even disappeared from China. However, for some types of fictions, the stricter the control, the more popular they become, the more ban the more popular. The banning of fictions by the Ming and Qing dynasties could result in two different outcomes: On one hand, the policy did actually play a role in banning fiction works. On the other hand, such policy also played a role in stimulating sales. The implementation and effectiveness of the policy of banning fictions by the Ming and Qing dynasties were closely related to the personal preferences of readers, booksellers, local governing officials and rulers.

Abstract

Chinese fictions were influenced by political, economic, and cultural factors at the time of the Ming(明) and Qing(淸) Dynasties. Many of these fictions were prohibited by the government. Banning fictions was a means by which the Ming and Qing dynasties implemented cultural governance while the Qing government took it into extremes. We intend to base on previous research results and try to make a more comprehensive inspection on the policy of banning fictions in Ming and Qing dynasties. Generally speaking, the Qing government took an extreme approach, while the Ming government adopted a relatively lenient approach in banning fictions. The Ming and Qing fiction prohibition and destruction policy undoubtedly influenced the creation and publication of fictions, At a stage, Some fiction works even disappeared from China. However, for some types of fictions, the stricter the control, the more popular they become, the more ban the more popular. The banning of fictions by the Ming and Qing dynasties could result in two different outcomes: On one hand, the policy did actually play a role in banning fiction works. On the other hand, such policy also played a role in stimulating sales. The implementation and effectiveness of the policy of banning fictions by the Ming and Qing dynasties were closely related to the personal preferences of readers, booksellers, local governing officials and rulers.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Luther Carrington Goodrich, "The Literary Inquisition of Chien-Lung" (1966), Paragon Book Reprint Corp
  2. 郭伯恭, "四庫全書纂修考" (1967), 臺灣商務印書館
  3. 王利器, "元明清三代禁毀小說戲曲史料" (1981), 上海古籍出版社
  4. 袁行霈, "中國文言小說書目" (1981), 北京大學出版社
  5. 孫楷弟, "中國通俗小說書目" (1982), 人民文學出版社
  6. 丁原基, "清代康雍乾三朝禁書原因之研究" (1983), 華正書局
  7. 李文治, "晚明民變" (1989), 中華書局⋅上海書店聯合出版
  8. 李致忠, "歷代刻書考述" (1989), 巴蜀書社
  9. 章培恒, "中國禁書大觀" (1990), 上海文藝出版社
  10. 陳大康, "通俗小說的歷史軌跡" (1993), 湖南出版社
  11. 胡光奇, "中國文禍史" (1993), 上海人民出版社
  12. 薛貞坊, "中國第一部禁毀小說≪剪燈新話≫擴談", 安徽大學學報, (4) (1995)
  13. 任麗潔, "談談清代禁毀書的幾個問題", 松遼學刊, (6) (1996)
  14. 王從仁, "中國歷代禁毀小說漫談" (1996), 雙笛國際出版
  15. 寧稼雨, "中國文言小說總目提要" (1996), 齊魯書社
  16. 陳益源, "古代小說述論" (1999), 線裝書局
  17. 譚帆, "中國分體文學學史(小說學卷)" (2013), 山西出版傳媒集團⋅山西教育出版社
  18. 강태권, "淸代禁毁小說硏究", 중국어문논총, 22 (2002)
  19. 강태권, "明代 禁書 硏究 — 愛情小說을 中心으로", 中國學論叢, 26 (2010)
  20. 강태권, "≪金甁梅≫를 통해 본 明代 禁書政策", 중국어문논총, (59), pp.167~187 (2013), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
  21. 최용철, "中國의 歷代 禁書小說 硏究", 중국어문논총, 13 (1997)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (25건)