본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

20세기 전환기 중국 평화담론 연구 ― “세계평화회의”를 중심으로

A Study on Peace Discourse in China at the Turn of the 20th Century— Focused on “World Peace Conference”

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

At the end of the nineteenth century, the world peace movement was developed around the world under the crisis of the devastating war. The World Peace Conference, including the First and Second Hague Peace Conference in 1899 and 1907. attracted political and ideological attention around world. The information and knowledge about the Peace Conference in China was mainly through the Wan Kwoh Kung Pao published by Western missionaries and Japanese scholars of international law. It’s two sources of knowledge were introduced and evaluated from different perspectives on the World Peace Conference. In the conflict of ideal of world peace and partition of state, Chinese intellectuals began to think deeply about peace conference and peace issue. Kang You-wei regarded peace as a universal human ideal and appreciated the change of the world as a process of development toward the Great unification of world and set a high value on the World Peace Conference. On the contrary, Zhang Zhi-dong and Zhang tai-yan regarded world peace movement as Westerncentrism based on the unequal sovereignty of world peoples in the world peace conference and international law, and the peace of China could only be secured through strenuous efforts. Thus, at the end of the nineteenth century, the universalist ideology and nationalism which prioritized the sovereignty of the nation and the state was in confrontation with each other over the world peace issues. In this process, They could not addressed deeply the issue of peace and equality of human society based on equality of sovereignty and fair process and method.

Abstract

At the end of the nineteenth century, the world peace movement was developed around the world under the crisis of the devastating war. The World Peace Conference, including the First and Second Hague Peace Conference in 1899 and 1907. attracted political and ideological attention around world. The information and knowledge about the Peace Conference in China was mainly through the Wan Kwoh Kung Pao published by Western missionaries and Japanese scholars of international law. It’s two sources of knowledge were introduced and evaluated from different perspectives on the World Peace Conference. In the conflict of ideal of world peace and partition of state, Chinese intellectuals began to think deeply about peace conference and peace issue. Kang You-wei regarded peace as a universal human ideal and appreciated the change of the world as a process of development toward the Great unification of world and set a high value on the World Peace Conference. On the contrary, Zhang Zhi-dong and Zhang tai-yan regarded world peace movement as Westerncentrism based on the unequal sovereignty of world peoples in the world peace conference and international law, and the peace of China could only be secured through strenuous efforts. Thus, at the end of the nineteenth century, the universalist ideology and nationalism which prioritized the sovereignty of the nation and the state was in confrontation with each other over the world peace issues. In this process, They could not addressed deeply the issue of peace and equality of human society based on equality of sovereignty and fair process and method.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. 심비르체바, "1907년 헤이그 평화회의의 개최과정과 성격", 한국독립운동사연구, (29), pp.57~85 (2007), 한국독립운동사연구소[DOI]
  2. 빌헬름 얀센, "코젤렉의 개념사 사전 5 : 평화" (2010), 푸른역사
  3. 임마누엘 칸트, "영구평화론" (2017), 서광사
  4. James Brown Scott, "The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907 (1~2)" (1909), Johns Hopkins Press
  5. James Brown Scott, "The proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences; translation of the official texts" (1920), Oxford University Press
  6. Paul Laity, "The British Peace Movement 1870-1914" (2002), Clarendon Press
  7. Sandi E. Cooper, "Patriotic pacifism: Waging war on war in Europe, 1815-1914" (1991), Oxford University Press
  8. 古城貞吉, "弭戰檄", 時務報, ~ (1897)
  9. 古城貞吉, "俄倡弭兵會", 昌言報, (五) (1898)
  10. 唐才常, "砭旧危言: 唐才常⋅宋恕集" (1994), 遼寧人民出版社
  11. 東甌陳虯, "論西國既設弭兵太平二會宜急先削去公法中之默許法而專力行性法", 經世報, (七) (1897)
  12. 縷馨倦史, "球弭兵會議(下)", ≪萬國公報≫ 第六十二冊, ~ (1894)
  13. 李提摩太, "戊戌變法(三)", pp.1957~ (1895), 上海人民出版社
  14. 林樂知, "地球弭兵會議(上)", ≪萬國公報≫ 第六十二冊, ~ (1894)
  15. 林樂知, "弭兵會散會情形述畧", ≪萬國公報≫ 第百三十冊, ~ (1899)
  16. 林樂知, "地球弭兵會續紀", ≪萬國公報≫ 第六十一冊, ~ (1894)
  17. 末廣博士, "第二回萬國平和會義與關於平和之諸問題", 學海: 甲編(文科⋅法科⋅政治科⋅商業科), 1(4) (1908), 北京大學留日學生編譯社發行
  18. 文學士有賀長雄, "論萬國弭兵會結菓", ≪亞東時報≫ 第十七號, ~ (1899)
  19. 美國林樂知, "論捐建哈格弭兵會公斷衙門", ≪萬國公報≫ 第二百冊, ~ (1805)
  20. 寺尾亨, "萬國平和同盟說源流考", ≪淸議報≫ 第十二冊, 光緖二十五年, ~ (1899)
  21. 邵之棠, "皇朝經世文統編" (1980), 文海出版社有限公司
  22. 邵之棠, "皇朝經世文統編⋅卷八十六⋅經武部十七弭兵", 一百零七卷, 敷文學堂藏本, ~ (1901)
  23. 易惠莉, "西学东渐与中国传统知识分子--沈毓桂个案研究" (1993), 吉林人民出版社
  24. 英國季理斐, "論弭兵會第二次之聚集", ≪萬國公報≫ 第二百八冊, ~ (1806)
  25. 英國季理斐譯, "荷京第二次弭兵會", ≪萬國公報≫ 第二百二十三冊, ~ (1907)
  26. 英國季理斐, "弭兵會紀聞", ≪萬國公報≫ 第225期, ~ (1907)
  27. 外務省, "日本外交文書: 海牙萬国平和会議" (1955), 巖南堂書店
  28. 有賀長雄, "萬國平和會議の一成一敗", 外交時報, 21 (1899)
  29. 章炳麟, "訄書詳注" (2000), 上海古籍出版社
  30. 張之洞, "勸學篇" (2002), 上海書局出版社
  31. 錢鍾書, "康有爲大同論二種" (1998), 三聯書店
  32. 田涛, "晚清知识界的弭兵说", 天津师范大学学报, (196) (2008)
  33. 鑄鐵生, "弭兵會記", ≪萬國公報≫ 第四十八冊, ~ (1893)
  34. 志達, "不平哉萬國平和會", 天義, (4) (1907)
  35. 晉安甘韓眠羊, "皇朝經世文新編續集⋅卷十四下" (1902), 商絳雪齋書局印
  36. 清麥仲華, "皇朝經世文新編⋅卷十八下民政" (1898), 上海大同譯書局刊行
  37. 夏東元, "鄭觀應集(上冊)" (1982), 上海人民出版社
  38. 懷寧何熙年, "裁兵私議", ≪時務報≫ 第五十四冊, ~ (1898)
  39. "德願弭兵", ≪萬國公報≫ 第二十七冊, ~ (1891)
  40. "論滿洲事宜交弭兵會公議", 北京新聞匯報, ~ (1901)
  41. "論弭兵息戰之策", ≪萬國公報≫ 第二冊, ~ (1889)
  42. "萬國平和會議", ≪經世報≫ 第六册, ~ (1897)
  43. "萬國平和會議", 蘇報, ~ (1897)
  44. "萬國平和會議", 奏中西局匯報, ~ (1897)
  45. "萬國平和會議", ≪集成报≫ 第二十四册, ~ (1897)
  46. "萬國平和會議", ≪萃報≫ 第十四期, ~ (1897)
  47. "弭兵良法", ≪萬國公報≫ 第五十七冊, ~ (1893)
  48. "弭兵有效", ≪萬國公報≫ 第九十二冊, ~ (1896)
  49. "弭兵虛願", ≪萬國公報≫ 第十九冊, ~ (1890)
  50. "弭兵會不可深信論", ≪昌言報≫ 第五冊, ~ (1898)
  51. "弭兵會日記", ≪萬國公報≫ 第百二十六冊, ~ (1899)
  52. "弭兵會集", ≪萬國公報≫ 第二十一冊, ~ (1890)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)