본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

명대 중기 시문선집 ≪文體明辨≫의 문체론 고찰

The Stylistic Study on the Anthology ≪Wenti Mingbian(文體明辨)≫ by Xu Shizeng(徐師曾) of Ming(明) Dynasty

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The anthology of ≪Wenti Mingbian(文體明辨)≫ is the selected book of prose and poem and also is the stylistic book by Xu Shizeng(徐師曾, 1517~1580) of Ming(明) Dynasty. The book was influenced by ≪Wenzhang Bianti(文章辨體)≫ by Wu Ne(吳訥). It classified the writing styles into 95 different styles of ≪Main Part(正編)≫ and 26 styles of ≪Appendix(附錄)≫. The “Xuti(序題)” of total 121 styles in ≪Wenti Mingbian(文體明辨)≫ explained the origin, changes, and creative techniques of writing style and also classified the writing styles into the concept of standard styles(正體) or modification styles(變體), and ancient styles or modern styles. It provided an understanding of the characteristics and changes in Chinese classical literature style. ≪Wenti Mingbian(文體明辨)≫ also included the writing styles of vulgar literature in ≪Appendix(附錄)≫. About 330 Cipai(詞牌) of ≪Shiyu(詩餘)≫ contained in the ≪Appendix(附錄)≫ are specially noteworthy. The book is considered as more a stylistics book than a anthology, for it developed the esoteric stylistic theories on the lot of classical writings and also expanded the range of stylistics over the many new vulgar literature writings. We can say that the book reflected the aspect of literary trends of Ming (明) Dynasty.

Abstract

The anthology of ≪Wenti Mingbian(文體明辨)≫ is the selected book of prose and poem and also is the stylistic book by Xu Shizeng(徐師曾, 1517~1580) of Ming(明) Dynasty. The book was influenced by ≪Wenzhang Bianti(文章辨體)≫ by Wu Ne(吳訥). It classified the writing styles into 95 different styles of ≪Main Part(正編)≫ and 26 styles of ≪Appendix(附錄)≫. The “Xuti(序題)” of total 121 styles in ≪Wenti Mingbian(文體明辨)≫ explained the origin, changes, and creative techniques of writing style and also classified the writing styles into the concept of standard styles(正體) or modification styles(變體), and ancient styles or modern styles. It provided an understanding of the characteristics and changes in Chinese classical literature style. ≪Wenti Mingbian(文體明辨)≫ also included the writing styles of vulgar literature in ≪Appendix(附錄)≫. About 330 Cipai(詞牌) of ≪Shiyu(詩餘)≫ contained in the ≪Appendix(附錄)≫ are specially noteworthy. The book is considered as more a stylistics book than a anthology, for it developed the esoteric stylistic theories on the lot of classical writings and also expanded the range of stylistics over the many new vulgar literature writings. We can say that the book reflected the aspect of literary trends of Ming (明) Dynasty.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 吳訥, "文章辨體序說⋅文體明辨序說" (1977), 太平書局
  2. 陳必詳, "한문문체론" (2001), 이회문화사
  3. 褚斌杰, "中國古代文體槪論" (1984), 北京大學出版社
  4. 안병설, "문체명변고", 어문학논총, 3 (1984), 국민대 어문학연구소
  5. 당윤희, "明代의 古文과 時文에 대한 一考 ― 唐宋八大家 古文選集을 중심으로", 중국어문논역총간, (35), pp.127~150 (2014), 중국어문논역학회
  6. 당윤희, "명대 시문선집 『文章辨體』의 문체론에 대한 고찰", 중국학보, (83), pp.67~91 (2018), 한국중국학회[DOI]
  7. 吳蕙珍, "明代徐師曾≪文體明辯≫之總集及文體研究價值", 건지인문학, 7 (2012)
  8. 任競澤, "辨體的文學方法論", 吉林師范大學學報 (人文社會科學版), (02) (2010)
  9. 任競澤, "論中國古代辨體發生的文化哲學淵源", 江西師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (03) (2010)
  10. 任競澤, "“文章以體制爲先”的文體論源流", 求索 (2016)
  11. 賈奮然, "論≪文體明辨序說≫的辨體觀", 首都師範大學學報(社會科學版), (02) (2007)
  12. 李樹軍, "≪文章辨體≫與≪文體明辨≫的歌行與樂府研究", 貴州文史叢刊, (02) (2008)
  13. 于景祥, "論徐師曾的駢文批評", 廣西師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版), (03) (2011)
  14. 吳承學, "明代文章總集與文體學——以≪文章辨體≫等三部總集爲中心", 文學遺產, (06) (2008)
  15. 吳承學, "從章句之學到文章之學", 文學評論, (05) (2008)
  16. 吳承學, "宋代文章總集的文體學意義", 中國社會科學, (02) (2009)
  17. 吳承學, "明代詩話中的文體史料與文體批評", 文藝理論研究, (04) (2008)
  18. 제해성, "中國文體分類學的硏究", 석사, pp.1993
  19. 仲曉婷, "徐師曾≪文體明辨≫研究", 碩士, pp.2006
  20. 馬欣華, "中國文論中的“文體”關鍵詞研究", 碩士, pp.2010

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)