문명의 기준과 근대 중국 인권담론
The Standard of Civilization and Chinese Discourse of Human Rights in the Early 20th Century
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Human rights is a fashionable theme over China in recent years. It is also the most conflicting matter between china and west nations. the critics on the problem of china’s human rights are based on some specific point of views of human rights, that is, human rights of enlightenment and individualism. They open charge chinese government with oppressing private rights of people for national profits. But Chinese government refute that it is an infringement of China’s sovereignty. This essay insist that Human rights of a nation demands more broad consideration in international standpoint. From the modern era onward, Human rights of a nation have come under the influence of international order and hegemony of thought and knowledge that continue to develop. This essay explore on the chinese discourse of rights in the early 20th century, and make clear that it is developed on the ground of “standard of Civilization” which offered imperialism the theoretical basis in the 19th and early 20th century. The standard of Civilization formed chinese special but general feature of thought of human rights, and encouraged formation sub-imperialist sentiment and consciousness. finally, This essay insist to re-consider the basis of modern human rights in history and international politics.
Abstract
Human rights is a fashionable theme over China in recent years. It is also the most conflicting matter between china and west nations. the critics on the problem of china’s human rights are based on some specific point of views of human rights, that is, human rights of enlightenment and individualism. They open charge chinese government with oppressing private rights of people for national profits. But Chinese government refute that it is an infringement of China’s sovereignty. This essay insist that Human rights of a nation demands more broad consideration in international standpoint. From the modern era onward, Human rights of a nation have come under the influence of international order and hegemony of thought and knowledge that continue to develop. This essay explore on the chinese discourse of rights in the early 20th century, and make clear that it is developed on the ground of “standard of Civilization” which offered imperialism the theoretical basis in the 19th and early 20th century. The standard of Civilization formed chinese special but general feature of thought of human rights, and encouraged formation sub-imperialist sentiment and consciousness. finally, This essay insist to re-consider the basis of modern human rights in history and international politics.
참고문헌 (50)
- Antoinette M. Burton, "The White Woman’s burden British Feminists and the Indian Woman, 1865-1915", Women’s Studies lnt. Forum, 13(4) (1990)
- Rudolf von Jhering, "The Struggle for Law" (1879), Callaghan and company
- Angle, Stephen C., "Human Rights and Chinese Thought: A Cross-Cultural Inquiry" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Ann Towns, "The Status of Women as a Standard of ‘Civilization’", European Journal of International Relations, 15(4), pp.681~706 (2009)
- Anthony Pagden, "Human Rights, Natural Rights, and Europe’s Imperial Legacy", POLITICAL THEORY, 31(2) (2003)
- Bauer, Joanne R., "The East Asia Challenge for Human Rights" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Brown, Peter G, "Human Rights and U.S. Foreign Policy: Principles and Applications" (1979), Lexington
- Callanhan, David, "Between Two Worlds, Realism, Idealism and American Foreign Policy after the Cold War" (1994), Harper Colins Publisher
- Duncan Bell, "John Stuart Mill on Colonies", Political theory, 38(1) (2010)
- Sankar Muthu, "Empire and Modern Political Thought" (2012), Cambridge university press
- Sankar Muthu, "Enlightenment against Empire" (2003), Princeton university press
- Gregory Claeys, "Revisiting The Origins of Human Rights" (2015), Cambridge University Press
- Herbert Spencer, "Social Statics: or, The Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified, and the First of Them Developed" (1851), John Chapman
- John Stuart Mill, "On Liberty" (1856), John W. Parker and son, West strand
- Roland Burke, "Decolonization and the Evolution of international Human Rights" (2010), University of Pennsylvania press
- T. S. Gray, "Herbert Spencer, On women: a studies in personal and political disillusion", international journal of women’s studies, 7(3) (1984)
- Terry R. Kandal, "The woman question in classical sociological theory" (1988), florida international university press
- Thomas Gondermann, "Progression and retrogression: Herbert Spencer’s explanations of social inequality", HISTORY OF THE HUMAN SCIENCES, 20(3)
- 법 감정의 형성에 대하여, "권리를 위한 투쟁", pp.2016, 루돌프 폰 예링
- 린 헌터, "인권의 발명" (2009), 돌베개
- 미셸린 이샤이, "세계인권사상사" (2005), 도서출판 길
- 서병훈, "존 스튜어트 밀의 위선?: ‘선의의 제국주의’", 철학연구, (98), pp.151~175 (2012), 철학연구회
- 성근제, "20세기 초 반청 혁명운동 자료선" (2011), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 존 스튜어트 밀, "존 스튜어트 밀 자유론" (2008), 서광사
- 주디스 버틀러, "누가 민족국가를 노래하는가 : 주디스 버틀러, 가야트리 스피박의 대담" (2008), 웅진씽크빅
- "來稿代論", 大公報, ~ (1903)
- "錄西報論文明野蠻之界說並書後", 大公報, ~ (1903)
- "論中國之前途及國民應盡之責任", 湖北學生界, (3) (1903)
- "亡國編", 國民報, (4) (1901)
- 張枬, "辛亥革命前十年間時論選集 第一卷(上)" (1960), 三聯書店
- "支那人之特質", 清議報, 71 (1901)
- 劉禾, "世界秩序與文明等級：全球史研究的新路徑" (2016), 生活ㆍ讀書ㆍ新知三聯書店
- 林樂知, "全地五大洲女俗通考" (1903), 廣學會
- 馬君武, "彌勒約翰自由原理, 少年中國新叢書" (1903), 上海開明書局
- 瑪吉士, "外國地理備考(海山仙館叢書本) 卷四", ~ (1847)
- 莫世祥, "馬君武集(1900-1919)" (1991), 華中師範大學出版社
- 穆勒, "群己權界論" (1903), 商務印書館
- 傷心人, "說奴隸", 清議報, 69 (1901)
- 哀時客, "國民十大元氣論", 清議報, 33 (1899)
- 愛自由者 金一, "女界鐘" (1903), 上海大同書局
- 楊廷棟, "路索民約論" (1902), 上海文明書局
- 任公, "文野三界之別", 清議報, 27 (1899)
- 張枬, "辛亥革命前十年間時論選集 第一卷(上)" (1960), 三聯書店
- 周琪, "人權與外交—―人權與外交國際研討會論文集" (2002), 時事出版社
- 周琪, "美國人權外交政策" (2001), 上海人民出版社
- 中國人權硏究會, "論人權與主權" (2001), 當代世界出版社
- 石川禎浩, "共同研究梁啓超: 西洋近代思想受容と明治日本" (1999), みすず書房
- 于海英, "『清議報』時期における梁啓超の救国の民権論", 山口大学文学会志, 66 (2016), 山口大學文學會
- 田村 安興, "ナショナリズムと自由民権" (2004), 清文堂出版
- 土屋英雄, "共同研究梁啟超：近代西洋思想受容と明治日本" (1999), みすず書房