现代汉语能性述补结构否定式的考察――兼论其语法化诱因和机制
A Study on the Negative Potential Verb: Complement Construction in Modern Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In previous studies, negative construction “V bu de(不得)” of the Potential Verb-Complement is more one-sided, and they are only divided into two semantic categories: “Impossibility” and “Impermissibility”. The multi-faceted nature of this structure lacks careful classification based on large-scale corpora. In this paper, based on a large-scale corpus-based empirical study, it is proposed to divide the “V bu de(不得)” express impermissible meanings, and divide it into two lower semantic categories from the perspective of grammar, sentence formation, and pragmatic meaning, that is, “Evaluative” and “Dissuasive”. In addition, by examining the diachronic evolution and synchronic performance of the “V bu de(不得)”, this paper argues that the meaning of the “V bu de(不得)”has evolved along this path, that is, “Impossibility ＞ Evaluative Impermissibility ＞ Dissuasive Impermissibility”.
Abstract
In previous studies, negative construction “V bu de(不得)” of the Potential Verb-Complement is more one-sided, and they are only divided into two semantic categories: “Impossibility” and “Impermissibility”. The multi-faceted nature of this structure lacks careful classification based on large-scale corpora. In this paper, based on a large-scale corpus-based empirical study, it is proposed to divide the “V bu de(不得)” express impermissible meanings, and divide it into two lower semantic categories from the perspective of grammar, sentence formation, and pragmatic meaning, that is, “Evaluative” and “Dissuasive”. In addition, by examining the diachronic evolution and synchronic performance of the “V bu de(不得)”, this paper argues that the meaning of the “V bu de(不得)”has evolved along this path, that is, “Impossibility ＞ Evaluative Impermissibility ＞ Dissuasive Impermissibility”.
참고문헌 (35)
- 贝罗贝, "当代语言学理论和汉语研究" (2008), 商务印书馆
- 陈宝珠, "X不得格式的历史发展", 博士, pp.2011
- 丁声树, "現代汉语语法讲话" (1961), 商务印书馆
- 黄伯荣, "现代汉语(增订二版)" (1997), 教育出版社
- 胡庆英, "六朝以来致使义组合“V得”研究", 博士, pp.2015
- 蒋绍愚, "近代汉语研究概况" (1994), 北京大学出版社
- 林玉莲, "环境心理学" (2000), 中国建筑工业出版社
- 刘月华, "可能补语用法的研究", 中国语文, (4) (1980)
- 刘月华, "实用现代汉语语法" (2001), 商务印书馆
- 刘坚, "论诱发汉语词汇语法化的若干因素", 中国语文, (3) (1995)
- 力量, "“V得”、“V不得”结构中“得”的语义和词性考察＞", 徐州师范学院学报, (3) (1990)
- 李宗江, "V 得(不得)” 与 “V 得了(不了)", 中国语文, (5) (1994)
- 李小华, "论汉语能性“得”字的后置", 汉语学报, (2) (2007)
- 李 明, "汉语助动词的历史演变研究", 博士, pp.2001
- 吕叔湘, "疑问. 否定. 肯定", 中国语文, (4) (1985)
- 齐春红, "说 ”V 不得", 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (3) (2004)
- 沈家煊, "不对称和标记论" (1999), 江西教育出版社
- 沈家煊, "语用原则, 语用推理和语义演变", 外语教学与研究, (4) (2004)
- 吴福祥, "汉语能性述补结构“V不得", 不C”的语法化, 2002, pp.(1), ~
- 王 力, "中国现代语法" (1985), 商务印书馆
- 王 力, "汉语史稿" (1980), 中华书局
- 汪国胜, "可能式“得”字句的句法不对称现象", 语言研究, (1) (1998)
- 徐思益, "汉语动词后置的“得”与“不得”", 新疆大学学报, (1) (1979)
- 岳俊发, "得” 字句的产生和演变", 语言研究, (2) (1984)
- 于 康, "“V 不得” 的否定焦点与语法化过程", 语文研究, (2) (2004)
- 袁毓林, "论否定句的焦点、预设和辖域歧义", 中国语文, (2) (2000)
- 赵元任, "汉语口语语法" (1979), 商务印书馆
- 张明友, "V不得”的词汇化研究", 博士, pp.2007
- Bybee, Joan L, "The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Vol.196" (1994), University of Chicago Press
- Narrog, Heiko, "Modality, mood, and change of modal meanings: A new perspective" (2005), Walter de Gruyter
- Leech, Geoffrey N, "Principles of pragmatics" (1983), Longman
- Chao Yuen Ren, "A grammar of spoken Chinese" (1968), University of California Press
- Dixon, Robert MW, "Basic linguistic theory volume 2: Grammatical topics. Vol. 2" (2010), Oxford University Press on Demand
- Heine, Bernd, "Grammaticalization:A conceptual framework" (1991), University of Chicago Press
- Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, "Regularity in semantic change" (2002), Cambridge University Press