양태 조동사의 외부 부정과 의미 등급의 상관관계
A study on the correlation between outer negation and scale of modal auxiliary verbs in Mandarin Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the aspects of negative forms used according to the meaning of modal auxiliary verbs, and considers the conditions that allow negative forms and the reasons for the occurrence of asymmetry. It was observed that as modal verbs transition from dynamic modality to epistemic modality, the usage of external negation forms becomes less flexible. The entailment and scale rules of modal auxiliary verbs are used to determine the position of modal auxiliary verbs on the semantic scale. The position on the semantic scale was confirmed using the entailment and scale rules of modal auxiliary verbs. Epistemic and deontic modal verbs exhibit clear distinctions in expressions placed on the semantic scale, categorized into weak, moderate, and strong gradations. However, dynamic modality lacks such clear distinctions. Finally, in Mandarin Chinese, only modal verbs positioned in the weak-moderate- strong scale can take outer negation forms. According to the opposition and total negation, other modal verbs are unable to outer negation forms.
Abstract
This paper examines the aspects of negative forms used according to the meaning of modal auxiliary verbs, and considers the conditions that allow negative forms and the reasons for the occurrence of asymmetry. It was observed that as modal verbs transition from dynamic modality to epistemic modality, the usage of external negation forms becomes less flexible. The entailment and scale rules of modal auxiliary verbs are used to determine the position of modal auxiliary verbs on the semantic scale. The position on the semantic scale was confirmed using the entailment and scale rules of modal auxiliary verbs. Epistemic and deontic modal verbs exhibit clear distinctions in expressions placed on the semantic scale, categorized into weak, moderate, and strong gradations. However, dynamic modality lacks such clear distinctions. Finally, in Mandarin Chinese, only modal verbs positioned in the weak-moderate- strong scale can take outer negation forms. According to the opposition and total negation, other modal verbs are unable to outer negation forms.
참고문헌 (35)
- 박재승, "조동사 ‘要’의 긍정･부정 형식 간 비대칭 현상 연구", 중국학연구, 58 (2011)
- 박재승, "조동사 ‘能’과 ‘可以’의 기능 비교 연구-양태범주를 중심으로", 중국연구, 55 (2012)
- 이명정, "현대중국어 ‘不能’의 의무양태 의미 연구", 중어중문학, 79 (2020)
- 이명정, "중국어 조동사 서술체계의 현황 분석 및 개선 방안", 중국연구, 90 (2022)
- 이명정, "基于力動態的動力情態助動詞考察", 중국어문학지, 84 (2023)
- 褚智歆, "能願動詞肯否不對稱問題分析", 碩士, pp.2008
- 崔希亮, "事件情態和漢語的表態系統", 語法研究和探索, (12), pp.331~347 (2003), 商務印書館
- 丁聲樹, "現代漢語語法講話" (1961), 商務印書館
- 古川裕, "助動詞“要”的語義分化及其主觀化和語法化", 對外漢語研究, (2) (2006)
- 郭銳, "衍推和否定", 世界漢語教學, (2)통권 : 76 (2006)
- 郭昭軍, "從“會2”與“可能”的比較看能願動詞“會2”的句法和語義", 語法研究和探索, (12) (2003), 商務印書館
- 郭昭軍, "“該”類助動詞的兩種模態類型及其選擇限制", 南開語言學刊, (2) (2011)
- 郭昭軍, "助動詞“要”的模態多義性及其制約因素", 漢語學習, (2) (2008)
- 韓文, "能願動詞“能、會、要、想”的肯定", 否定不對稱現象研究, 蘇州大學, 2016
- 侯瑞芬, "從力量與障礙看現代漢語情態動詞“可以”、“能”、“會”", 語言學論叢, (40) (2009)
- 李命定, "信念與概率：認識情態動詞的語義差異及其功能分化", 世界漢語教學, 32(1) (2018)
- 林劉巍, "漢語情態和否定的互動研究", 博士, pp.2016
- 劉月華, "實用現代漢語語法" (2001), 商務印書館
- 呂叔湘, "中國文法要略" (2014), 商務印書館
- 呂叔湘, "現代漢語八百詞" (2007), 商務印書館
- 彭利貞, "現代漢語情態研究" (2007), 中國社會科學出版社
- 沈家煊, "不對稱和標記論" (1999), 江西教育出版社
- 齊滬揚, "現代漢語語氣成分用法詞典" (2011), 商務印書館
- 石毓智, "肯定和否定的對稱與不對稱" (2001), 北京語言文化大學出版社
- 于康, "命題內成分與命題外成分-以漢語助動詞為例", 世界漢語教學, (1) (1996)
- 中國社會科學院語言研究所詞典編輯室, "倒序現代漢語詞典" (1987), 商務印書館
- 周北海, "模態邏輯" (1996), 商務印書館
- 朱德熙, "語法講義" (1982), 商務印書館
- Chao, Yuenren, "漢語口語語法" (1979), 商務印書館
- Jespersen, Otto, "語法哲學" (2009), 商務印書館
- Laurence R. Horn, "A Natural History of Negation" (2001), University of Chicago Press
- Palmer, F. R., "Modality and the English Modals" (1979), Longman
- Palmer, F. R., "Mood and Modality" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Sweetser, Eve, "From Etymology to Pragmatics" (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Talmy, Leonard, "Toward a Cognitive Semantics(1vols)" (2000), MIT Press