본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

풍류도의 발견과 문화 정통론 구상 - 凡父 김정설의 사상과 ‘풍류-도통론’

The thought of Kim Jeong-seol and the construction of cultural orthodoxy of Korean philosophical tradition

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Beom-bu Kim Jeong-seol is not a well known figure as a thinker. Compared to Ham Seok-heon or Yu Young-mo upon whom recent scholar's attention was given, Beom-bu's thought is trivial both in its volume and quality. Nevertheless, I find that there are several interesting aspects in his thoughts. The key factor of his thought is an idea of orthodoxal genealogy of the Korean culture. He insists that the line of thoughts from shamanism, through Pung-ryu-do(the way of wind-and-flow) and taoist inner alchemical self cultuvation, to Dong-hak(Eastern Learning) is main stream of Korean culture. Beom-bu shows changes of interest in finding philosophical resources of his thought not in Confucain tradition but in Taoism and its cultivation system. Based on Taoist tradition, Beom-bu tries to overcome Neo-confucian theory of principle and vital-force. Even though he gives special emphasis on shamanism and Pung-ryu-do, he needs help from Taoism to go beyond Neo-confucainism. After criticizing Neoconfucianism Beom-bu finds philosophical possibility of the future in the thought of Choi Je-woo. As a result, Beom-bu could find an alternative genealogy of cultural orthodox, instead of Neo-confucianism.

Abstract

Beom-bu Kim Jeong-seol is not a well known figure as a thinker. Compared to Ham Seok-heon or Yu Young-mo upon whom recent scholar's attention was given, Beom-bu's thought is trivial both in its volume and quality. Nevertheless, I find that there are several interesting aspects in his thoughts. The key factor of his thought is an idea of orthodoxal genealogy of the Korean culture. He insists that the line of thoughts from shamanism, through Pung-ryu-do(the way of wind-and-flow) and taoist inner alchemical self cultuvation, to Dong-hak(Eastern Learning) is main stream of Korean culture. Beom-bu shows changes of interest in finding philosophical resources of his thought not in Confucain tradition but in Taoism and its cultivation system. Based on Taoist tradition, Beom-bu tries to overcome Neo-confucian theory of principle and vital-force. Even though he gives special emphasis on shamanism and Pung-ryu-do, he needs help from Taoism to go beyond Neo-confucainism. After criticizing Neoconfucianism Beom-bu finds philosophical possibility of the future in the thought of Choi Je-woo. As a result, Beom-bu could find an alternative genealogy of cultural orthodox, instead of Neo-confucianism.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 최재목ㆍ이태우ㆍ정다운, "凡父 金鼎卨 연구를 위한 예비적 고찰", 일본문화연구, (24), pp.241~266 (2007), 동아시아일본학회
  2. 최재목, "「鷄林學塾」과 凡父 金鼎卨(1) - ‘設立期’를 중심으로 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(16), pp.221~243 (2008), 동북아시아문화학회
  3. 최재목, "『凡父文庫』를 통해서 본 凡父 金鼎卨의 東洋學 지식의 범주", 유학연구, 18, pp.299~332 (2008), 유학연구소
  4. 鄭茶雲, "凡父 金鼎卨の󰡔花郞外史から見る花郞觀", 東アジア「武士道の硏究」国際シンポ ジャム (2009), 北京外國語大學 日本學硏究センタ-
  5. 우기정, "凡父 金鼎卨의 ‘國民倫理論’ 構想 속의 ‘孝’", 동북아 문화연구, 1(19), pp.227~242 (2009), 동북아시아문화학회
  6. 최재목, "凡父 金鼎卨의 日本 遊學ㆍ行蹟에 대한 檢討", 일본문화연구, (31), pp.449~468 (2009), 동아시아일본학회
  7. 최재목, "범부(凡父) 김정설(金鼎卨)의 『風流精神』에 대한 검토", 동북아 문화연구, 1(20), pp.103~122 (2009), 동북아시아문화학회
  8. 이태우, "일제강점기 한국철학자 연구(Ⅰ) - 범부 김정설의 풍류도론 -", 인문과학연구, 12 (2009), 대구 카톨릭대학 인문과학연구소
  9. 우기정, "凡父 김정설의 <國民倫理論>에 대하여 - 「國民倫理特講」을 中心으로 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(22), pp.61~83 (2010), 동북아시아문화학회
  10. 정다운, "凡父 金鼎卨의 『花郞外史』에서 본 「花郞觀」", 동북아 문화연구, 1(23), pp.129~143 (2010), 동북아시아문화학회
  11. 박맹수, "凡父 金鼎卨의 東學觀", 2009年 <凡父硏究會> 第2回 學術세미나 (2009), 凡父硏究會
  12. 손진은, "金凡父와 金東里,그리고 徐廷柱의 상관관계", 2009年 <凡父硏究會> 第2回 學術세미나 (2009), 凡父硏 究會
  13. 최재목, "凡父 연구의 현황과 과제 및 凡父의 학문방법론", 2009年 <凡父硏究會> 第2回 學術세미나 (2009), 凡父 硏究會.
  14. 정다운, "凡父 金鼎卨의 風流挺身에 대한 硏究 - 멋ㆍ和ㆍ妙를 중심으로 -", 박사, pp.2010
  15. 우기정, "韓國에서의 國民倫理論 成立에 대한 硏究 - 凡父 金鼎卨의 <國民倫理論>을 중심으로 -", 박사, pp.2010

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (27건)