본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

凡父 金鼎卨의 ‘國民倫理論’ 構想 속의 ‘孝’

Bum-Boo(凡父) Kim, Jeong-Sul(金鼎卨)'s filial piety in ‘a theory of national ethics’

우기정
동북아시아문화학회 (The Association of North-East Asian Cultures)|2009.06|동북아 문화연구 (Journal of North-east Asian Cultures)|제1권 제19호|pp. 227-242|DOI 10.17949/jneac.1.19.200906.011

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

凡父國民倫理論朴正熙Bum-Booa theory of national ethicsa lecture on national ethicsfilial pietyPark Chung-Hee『國民倫理特講』孝
주제분류학제간연구

초록

This thesis is written for seeing how the concept of filial piety was expressed in our traditional society and through what kind of discussion it was represented in 1950's by referring to his major study of a lecture on national ethics(「國民倫理特講」). Bum-Boo(凡父) is an oriental philosopher getting public attention recently in academic world. And he made his own idea by reconsiderating or coining the concept of ‘東方’, ‘花郞’, ‘a theory of national ethics(國民倫理)’. A lecture on national ethics(「國民倫理特講」) is an collective one based on “a theory of national ethics” among his a few works. Without any investigation on it, just because his name is on the list of “one of special members 50 for Reconstruct Move”, his genius was ignored. So this thesis shows that what position filial piety had in the idea of Bum-Boo(凡父)'s ‘a theory of national ethics(國民倫理論)’ and what influence it had on political powers in 1950's and 1960's. We kept track of these connections to know the circumstances at that time based on some data such as newspapers and statements. I think there is still some part which needs to be supplemented, but filial piety which is core of Bum-Boo(凡父)'s ‘a theory of national ethics(國民倫理論)’ was 苦肉策 to attract our unity against the dictatorship under president Lee's administration. Bum-Boo(凡父), though he was out of political powers, brought the concept of filial piety to take publish sentiment into the right direction and provide the new vision. And through this, he talked about 'unity' to be better nation.

Abstract

This thesis is written for seeing how the concept of filial piety was expressed in our traditional society and through what kind of discussion it was represented in 1950's by referring to his major study of a lecture on national ethics(「國民倫理特講」). Bum-Boo(凡父) is an oriental philosopher getting public attention recently in academic world. And he made his own idea by reconsiderating or coining the concept of ‘東方’, ‘花郞’, ‘a theory of national ethics(國民倫理)’. A lecture on national ethics(「國民倫理特講」) is an collective one based on “a theory of national ethics” among his a few works. Without any investigation on it, just because his name is on the list of “one of special members 50 for Reconstruct Move”, his genius was ignored. So this thesis shows that what position filial piety had in the idea of Bum-Boo(凡父)'s ‘a theory of national ethics(國民倫理論)’ and what influence it had on political powers in 1950's and 1960's. We kept track of these connections to know the circumstances at that time based on some data such as newspapers and statements. I think there is still some part which needs to be supplemented, but filial piety which is core of Bum-Boo(凡父)'s ‘a theory of national ethics(國民倫理論)’ was 苦肉策 to attract our unity against the dictatorship under president Lee's administration. Bum-Boo(凡父), though he was out of political powers, brought the concept of filial piety to take publish sentiment into the right direction and provide the new vision. And through this, he talked about 'unity' to be better nation.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 金凡父, "花郞外史(初版)" (1954), 海軍本部政訓監室
  2. 金凡父, "花郞外史(再版)" (1967), 凡父先生 遺稿刊行會
  3. 金凡父, "花郞外史(三版)", pp.216~240 (1981), 以文出版社
  4. 金凡父, "凡父遺稿(政治哲學特講)" (1986), 以文出版社
  5. 金凡父, "風流精神" (1986), 定音社
  6. 金凡父, "風流精神" (2009), 영남대학교 출판부
  7. 檀紀四二八六年以降, "認可", 汶坡敎育財團, ~
  8. 문교부 도의교육위원회, "도의교육" (1957), 문교부도의교육위원회
  9. 문교부 도의교육위원회, "도의생활지도요령" (1958), 교학도서
  10. 文榮漢, "道義敎育指針", pp.43~ (1958), 정문사
  11. 沈泰鎭, "道義敎育의 理論과 實踐", pp.11~18 (1954), 民敎社
  12. 中央敎育硏究所, "道義敎育의 指針" (1955), 大韓敎育聯合會
  13. 손인수, "한국인의 가치관", pp.133~ (1984), 문음사
  14. 李樂毅, "漢字演變", pp.187~ (2006), 北京語言大學出版社
  15. 정달현, "한국 전통 사상의 현대적 구현: 金凡父의 풍류도론 in : 우리시대의 정치사회사상", pp.365~ (2003), 영남대출판부
  16. 최종근, "경로사상과 노인문제", pp.75~76 (1987), 경원문화사
  17. 황경식, "서양윤리학의 수용과 그 영향 in : 철학연구 50년", pp.497~ (2003), 혜안
  18. 우기정, "朝鮮時代의 孝 思想 硏究", 석사, 한국학과, pp.2007
  19. 鄭茶雲, "凡父 金鼎卨の『花郞外史』から見る｢花郞觀｣, 『東アジア｢武士道の硏究｣国際ｼﾝﾎﾟジャム』", 北京日本學硏究センタ- (2009)
  20. 최재목, "儒敎에서 ‘老’의 의미와 기능", 유교사상연구, 33(33), pp.259~296 (2008), 한국유교학회
  21. 崔在穆, "이퇴계의 초상화에 대하여", 퇴계학논집, (2) (2008), 영남퇴계학연구원
  22. 崔在穆, "韓國における｢武の精神｣․｢武士道｣の誕生’, 󰡔東アジア｢武士道の硏究｣国際ｼﾝﾎﾟジャム", 北京日本學硏究センタ- (2009)
  23. 최재목, "凡父 金鼎卨 연구를 위한 예비적 고찰", 일본문화연구, (24), pp.241~266 (2007), 동아시아일본학회
  24. 최재목, "『凡父文庫』를 통해서 본 凡父 金鼎卨의 東洋學 지식의 범주", 유학연구, 18, pp.299~332 (2008), 유학연구소
  25. 최재목, 정다운, "「鷄林學塾」과 凡父 金鼎卨(1) - ‘設立期’를 중심으로 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(16), pp.221~243 (2008), 동북아시아문화학회
  26. "‘緊切한 ｢國民倫理憲章｣’, <동아일보>, 1958.12.17-1면 8단", ~ (1958)
  27. "國民倫理憲章 - 草案을 검토 중, <동아일보>, 1959. 01.20-3면 10단", ~ (1959)
  28. "깨끗하게 명랑하게 부지런하고 검박한 산림 ｢國民倫理綱領｣ 마지막 草案作成’, <동아일보>, 1959.02. 21-3면 3단", ~ (1959)
  29. "국민도덕은 제가끔 실천해야 한다, <국민보> 1959.03.04.", ~ (1959)
  30. "國民倫理憲章26日最終檢討’, <동아일보>, 1960.01.23-3면 9단", ~ (1960)
  31. "敎委總會거쳐 二月中公布 ｢國民倫理綱領｣을 完成’, <동아일보>, 1960.02.01-3면 5단", ~ (1960)
  32. "성실 정직하여 품위 있는 사람이 되자, <국민보>, 1960.03.09.", ~ (1960)
  33. "소선규 범국민당 발기선언’(동아방송DBS. 1963. 6.13)", ~ (1963)
  34. [URL]
  35. 이완재, "榴軒 李鍾厚 先生 회고담"

관련 논문AI추천

凡父 김정설의 <國民倫理論>에 대하여 - 「國民倫理特講」을 中心으로 -우기정동북아시아문화학회 · 동북아 문화연구2010 · 제1권 제22호凡父 김정설의 ‘政治哲學’과 ‘國民運動’ -『政治哲學特講』을 중심으로 -우기정유학연구소 · 유학연구2010 · 제21권 범부(凡父) 김정설(金鼎卨)의 『風流精神』에 대한 검토정다운, 최재목동북아시아문화학회 · 동북아 문화연구2009 · 제1권 제20호‘국민운동’ 제창과 그 이념적 지향: 범부 김정설 정치철학 탐색김석근동북아시아문화학회 · 동북아 문화연구2012 · 제1권 제31호근현대기 사상가 凡父 金鼎卨과 朴正熙의 이념적 연관성최재목한국일본사상사학회 · 日本思想2013 · 제24호『凡父文庫』를 통해서 본 凡父 金鼎卨의 東洋學 지식의 범주이태우, 정다운, 최재목유학연구소 · 유학연구2008 · 제18권

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)

을미사변 후 고종의 國母復讎와 君主專制論신명호pp. 5-22淸末新政 시기 五大臣出洋과 군주입헌론의 전개 - 端方을 중심으로조세현pp. 23-48幕末期의 새로운 권력구조 구상이근우pp. 49-7119세기말∼20세기초 티베트의 군주론의 변용박장배pp. 73-9119세기말 琉球의 滅亡과 君主權양수지pp. 93-120
원문 보기