본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

凡父 김정설의 <國民倫理論>에 대하여 - 「國民倫理特講」을 中心으로 -

A Study on Bum-Boo Kim, Jeong-Seol's <The Theory of National Ethic> - Focusing on ‘lecture on national ethics’

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The aim of this paper is to analyse ‘the theory of national ethics(國民倫理論)’ that was Bum-Boo(凡父) Kim, Jeong-Seol(金鼎卨)'s ‘lecture on national ethics(「國民倫理特講」)’ and figure it's main idea out through comparing with the ‘charter of national education(國民敎育憲章)’. It was gathered by his students who was given a lecture on national ethics by Bum-Boo in early 1950s. The reason of this lecture was for giving Korean a national standard of behaving(=national ethics, 國民倫理) what we lost during under the rule of Japanese imperialism. In other words, he tired to find our lost national ethics, awake that and find harmony from our ethos. Consequently, he wanted to realize our ethos to Korea, which is a nation state. To know our national ethics, we should look for our ethos. Bum-Boo to put emphasis on Hwalangdo(花郞道, =風流精神). He said it runs in our blood. Therefore, it can be a new standard of national ethics of new age. He found filial piety(孝) which is the core of ‘The harmony(調和)’. It can be widened in Not only Korea but also the world to enter a global society. This thesis shows that what position filial piety had in the idea of Bum-Boo's a theory of national ethics and what influence it had on political powers in 1950's and 1960's. We kept track of these connections to know the circumstances at that time. Bum-Boo, though he was out of political powers, brought the concept of filial piety to take publish sentiment into the right direction and provide the new vision. And through this, he talked about ‘unity’ to be better nation. The theory, however, used a idea for justifying Park, chung-hee administration's policy without his will. reviewing the history of ‘charter of national education(國民敎育憲章)’, we can notice how it was distorted.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse ‘the theory of national ethics(國民倫理論)’ that was Bum-Boo(凡父) Kim, Jeong-Seol(金鼎卨)'s ‘lecture on national ethics(「國民倫理特講」)’ and figure it's main idea out through comparing with the ‘charter of national education(國民敎育憲章)’. It was gathered by his students who was given a lecture on national ethics by Bum-Boo in early 1950s. The reason of this lecture was for giving Korean a national standard of behaving(=national ethics, 國民倫理) what we lost during under the rule of Japanese imperialism. In other words, he tired to find our lost national ethics, awake that and find harmony from our ethos. Consequently, he wanted to realize our ethos to Korea, which is a nation state. To know our national ethics, we should look for our ethos. Bum-Boo to put emphasis on Hwalangdo(花郞道, =風流精神). He said it runs in our blood. Therefore, it can be a new standard of national ethics of new age. He found filial piety(孝) which is the core of ‘The harmony(調和)’. It can be widened in Not only Korea but also the world to enter a global society. This thesis shows that what position filial piety had in the idea of Bum-Boo's a theory of national ethics and what influence it had on political powers in 1950's and 1960's. We kept track of these connections to know the circumstances at that time. Bum-Boo, though he was out of political powers, brought the concept of filial piety to take publish sentiment into the right direction and provide the new vision. And through this, he talked about ‘unity’ to be better nation. The theory, however, used a idea for justifying Park, chung-hee administration's policy without his will. reviewing the history of ‘charter of national education(國民敎育憲章)’, we can notice how it was distorted.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 金凡父, "國民倫理特講 in:花郞外史", pp.195~249 (1981), 以文出版社
  2. 金凡父, "邦人과 國家觀과 花郞精神", 最高會議報, 2, pp.132~135 (1961), 國家再建最高會議
  3. 金凡父, "政治哲學特講(凡父遺稿)", pp.96~107 (1986), 以文出版社
  4. 崔致遠, "鸞郞碑序文", ~
  5. 金正根, "金凡父를 찾아서 in:凡父 金鼎卨 硏究", pp.50~ (2009), 대구프린팅
  6. 우기정, "凡父 金鼎卨의 ‘國民倫理論’ 構想 속의 ‘孝’", 동북아 문화연구, 1(19), pp.227~242 (2009), 동북아시아문화학회
  7. 李完栽, "凡父先生과 東方思想 in:凡父 金鼎卨 硏究", pp.76~77 (2009), 대구프린팅
  8. 정달현, "金凡父와 國民倫理論", 現代와宗敎, 10, pp.283~ (1987), 현대종교문화연구소
  9. 정달현, "한국 전통 사상의 현대적 구현:金凡父의 풍류도론 in:우리시대의 정치사회사상", pp.365~ (2003), 영남대출판부
  10. 朱甫暾, "신라 화랑도(花郞徒) 연구의 현황과 과제", 啓明史學, pp.89~90 (1997), 계명사학회
  11. 진교훈, "凡父 金鼎卨의 생애와 사상", 철학과현실, (64), pp.219~ (2005), 철학문화연구소
  12. 최재목, "韓国における「武の精神」·「武士道」の誕生 - 花郞と武士道との結び付きへの批判的省察 -", 양명학, (22), pp.313~360 (2009), 한국양명학회
  13. 최재목, "범부(凡父) 김정설(金鼎卨)의 『風流精神』에 대한 검토", 동북아 문화연구, 1(20), pp.103~122 (2009), 동북아시아문화학회
  14. 홍윤기, "국민교육헌장, 왜 그리고 어떻게 만들어졌나?", 내일을 여는 역사, (18), pp.114~117 (2004)
  15. 황경식, "서양윤리학의 수용과 그 영향 in:철학연구 50년", pp.497~ (2003), 혜안
  16. 황산덕, "어디다 國民倫理를 세울 것인가", 國民倫理연구, 2(1), pp.139~ (1974), 한국국민윤리학회
  17. 李瑄根, "花郎道研究 再版", pp.2~233 (1950), 해동문화사
  18. 李瑄根, "花郎道와三國統一", pp.7~ (1974), 세종대왕기념사업회
  19. 이종익, "東方思想論叢", pp.47~54 (1975), 동방사상논총간행위원회
  20. 최재목, "凡父 金鼎卨 단편선", pp.41~78 (2009), 선인출판사
  21. 황산덕, "自畵像", pp.1~305 (1966), 신아출판사
  22. 황산덕, "三玄學", pp.1~275 (1978), 서문당

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)