종교다원주의의 ‘궁극적 실재’개념 연구 -존 힉(John Hick)의 논의를 중심으로-
Critical Study on ‘Ultimate Reality’ in Religious Pluralism -Focused on John Hick’s Hypothesis-
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Religious pluralists insist that it is possible to accomplish the mutual respect and peaceful coexistence by means of interreligious dialogue. The prominent pluralist, John Hick, suggests the Ultimate Reality as a hypothesis and common ground for dialogue. In this regard, Hick summons religious traditions and subsumes them with respect to the Ultimate Reality. In this paper, I assert that the Ultimate Reality which Hick proposes is a means not for dialogue, but for a monologue so that it can be the strategy of the subject. I first criticize the Ultimate Reality as derived from Wittgenstein’s family-resemblance. And then limits of Hick’s definition of religion comparing it with Durkheim’s are presented. Finally, I claim that Hick’s Ultimate Reality itself is neither ‘ultimate’ nor ‘real’. I conclude with the intention that Hick’s Ultimate Reality as a hypothesis for interreligious dialogue includes covert oppression and entails a potential for violence.
Abstract
Religious pluralists insist that it is possible to accomplish the mutual respect and peaceful coexistence by means of interreligious dialogue. The prominent pluralist, John Hick, suggests the Ultimate Reality as a hypothesis and common ground for dialogue. In this regard, Hick summons religious traditions and subsumes them with respect to the Ultimate Reality. In this paper, I assert that the Ultimate Reality which Hick proposes is a means not for dialogue, but for a monologue so that it can be the strategy of the subject. I first criticize the Ultimate Reality as derived from Wittgenstein’s family-resemblance. And then limits of Hick’s definition of religion comparing it with Durkheim’s are presented. Finally, I claim that Hick’s Ultimate Reality itself is neither ‘ultimate’ nor ‘real’. I conclude with the intention that Hick’s Ultimate Reality as a hypothesis for interreligious dialogue includes covert oppression and entails a potential for violence.
참고문헌 (47)
- 강영안, "도덕은 무엇으로부터 오는가?: 칸트의 도덕철학", pp.97~100 (2000), 소나무
- 길희성, "죤 힉의 철학적 종교다원주의론", 종교연구, 15, pp.289~290 (1998)
- 김경재, "해석학과 종교신학" (1994), 한국신학연구소
- 김종서, "종교다원주의와 한국신학적 의미", 한국기독교신학논총, 9, pp.414~ (1992)
- 김중은, "종교다원주의에 대한 오해와 이해: 김경재 교수의 “종교다원론에 대한 교계의 열병을 보며”를 중심으로", 기독교사상, 401 (1992)
- 김영한, "종교다원주의와 그리스도의 유일성", 성경과 신학, 17 (1995)
- 서철원, "종교 다원주의", pp.6~ (2007), 총신대학교출판부
- 신옥희, "칸트에 있어서 근본악과 신", 철학, 18, pp.72~ (1982)
- 윤혜준, "알튀세: 마르크스주의적 주체 비판 in: 주체 개념의 비판", pp.144~148 (1999), 서울대학교출판부
- 이정배, "종교다원주의(종교간의 대화)와 현대적 신론", 신학과 세계, 19 (1989)
- 이현모, "종교다원주의에 대한 이해와 대처", 목회와 신학, 116 (1992)
- 전호진, "복음주의 관점에서 본 종교 다원주의", 성경과 신학, 11 (1992)
- 정대현, "지식과 가족유사성 in: 비트겐슈타인과 분석철학의 전개", pp.105~22 (1991), 철학과현실사
- 조영석, "존 힉의 종교다원주의 가설 비판", 한국개혁신학 논문집, 16 (2004)
- 한인철, "종교다원주의의 유형" (2005), 한국기독교연구소
- 炳谷行人, "探究1" (1986), 講談社
- Adam Katz, "Louis Althusser in: Encyclopedia of Postmodernism", pp.9~10 (2001), Routledge
- Alister McGrath, "Passion for Truth: The Intellectual Coherence of Evangelicalism", pp.220~240 (1996), InterVarsity Press
- Anthony Manser, "Games and Resemblances", Philosophy, 42(161), pp.210~225 (1967)
- Daniel L. Pals, "Eight Theories of Religion", pp.107~ (2006), Oxford University Press
- 박홍규, "오리엔탈리즘", pp.83~84 (2006), 교보문고
- 백종현, "실천이성비판", pp.108~110 (2007), 아카넷
- Émile Durkheim, "The Elementary Forms of Religious Life", pp.418~ (1912), The Free Press
- Gerardus van der Leeuw, "Religion in Essence and Manifestation", pp.672~ (1938), Princeton University Press
- 오강남, "종교다원주의와 세계종교", pp.62~ (1996), 대한기독교서회
- Joachim Wach, "Sociology of religion", pp.6~ (1944), The University of Chicago Press
- Jonathan Z. Smith, "What a Difference a Difference Makes in: Relating Religion", pp.245~ (2004), The University of Chicago Press
- John B. Cobb, Jr., "Beyond 'Pluralism'", 서울대 종교문제연구소 초청강연 원고, pp.10~ (2004)
- John Hick, "God Has Many Names", pp.23~39 (1980), The Westminster Press
- John Hick, "On Grading Religions", Religious Studie, 17(4), pp.466~467 (1981)
- 김승철, "새로운 기독교", pp.116~ (1991), 도서출판 나단
- John Hick, "Religious Pluralism", The Encyclopedia of Religion, 12, pp.331~333 (1987), Macmillan Publishing Company
- 김희수, "종교철학", pp.15~ (2000), 동문선
- John Hick, "The Metaphor of God Incarnate: Christology in a Pluralistic Age", pp.2~ (1993), Westminster John Knox Press
- John Hick, "An Interpretation of Religion: Human Reponses to the Transcendent" (2004), Yale University Press
- Joseph Runzo, "Global Philosophy of Religion-A Short Introduction", pp.33~41 (2001), Oneworld Publications
- Louis Althusser, "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses(Notes towards an Investigation) in: Jr", pp.100~140 (1969), Verso
- 이영철, "철학적 탐구", pp.69~70 (2006), 책세상
- 이영철, "청색책ㆍ갈색책", pp.208~ (2006), 책세상
- Mircea Eliade, "The Sacred and the Profane:The Nature of Religion,trans.Willard R.Trask(New", pp.12~ (1959), Harcourt
- Ninian Smart, "Concept and Empathy: Essays in the Study of Religion", pp.41~43 (1986), The Macmillan Press
- 변선환, "오직 예수 이름으로만?", pp.130~270 (2006), 한국신학연구소
- Raimundo Panikkar, "The Intrareligious Dialogue in: 종교간의 대화", pp.19~37 (1978), Paulist Press
- 남기창, "비트켄슈타인과 철학", pp.51~70 (1998)
- 길희성, "성스러움의 의미", pp.44~ (2003), 분도출판사
- 김승혜, "지구촌 신앙", pp.17~ (1993), 분도출판사
- 김재영, "종교적 경험의 다양성", pp.587~ (2003), 한길사