日韓自動車企業の最高経営者の影響力比較 ―トヨタと現代の役員人事を事例に―
Comparison Study of Japanese and Korean Influence on Top Management in Automobile Companies -The Case of Managerial level Human Resource Concerns in Toyota and Hyundai-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis referred to the comparative study between two leading automotive companies of Toyota and Hyundai-Kia which could represent as Japanese and South Korean company. Concretely, the common features was strongly extracted that a few number of person had decision power for personnel affairs further that regarding appointment of the young officers(Top managements being conservative for selection of the young competent officers in Toyota, while on the other hand since chairman was positive in promoting the young in case of Hyundai but its real aim was to strengthen the chairman's authority ). Furthermore differences became clear that the posts of officers had been changed frequently to strengthen the chairman's authority and that some officers were appointed to take their posts in only a short period of time to fulfill their satisfaction In addition, on the earlier literatures there were a few investigation reports, or enlightenment books which referred influence of top management's in personnel affairs. Moreover, it had only indicated that Japanese companies had bottom-up style and the South Korean which ones had top-down style for the role of top manager's in the past of comparative studies of companies in general or automobile companies. As opposed to these, the originality of this research can be shown by indicating the top-down tendency in Toyota which was typical Japanese company and by extracting uniqueness in Hyundai-Kia which took into consideration pride of the officers and the absoluteness of the chairman's authority at the same time.
Abstract
This thesis referred to the comparative study between two leading automotive companies of Toyota and Hyundai-Kia which could represent as Japanese and South Korean company. Concretely, the common features was strongly extracted that a few number of person had decision power for personnel affairs further that regarding appointment of the young officers(Top managements being conservative for selection of the young competent officers in Toyota, while on the other hand since chairman was positive in promoting the young in case of Hyundai but its real aim was to strengthen the chairman's authority ). Furthermore differences became clear that the posts of officers had been changed frequently to strengthen the chairman's authority and that some officers were appointed to take their posts in only a short period of time to fulfill their satisfaction In addition, on the earlier literatures there were a few investigation reports, or enlightenment books which referred influence of top management's in personnel affairs. Moreover, it had only indicated that Japanese companies had bottom-up style and the South Korean which ones had top-down style for the role of top manager's in the past of comparative studies of companies in general or automobile companies. As opposed to these, the originality of this research can be shown by indicating the top-down tendency in Toyota which was typical Japanese company and by extracting uniqueness in Hyundai-Kia which took into consideration pride of the officers and the absoluteness of the chairman's authority at the same time.
참고문헌 (47)
- 李震雨, "自動車企業における生産・販売統合システムの日韓比較-トヨタ自動車と現代自動車との比較を中心として-", 商学論集, 37(1), pp.31~54 (2002), 同志社大学商学研究院生会
- 李震雨, "自動車サプライヤーシステムの日韓比較-生産と購買のコーディネーションを中心として-", 商学論集, 39(2), pp.87~113 (2005), 同志社大学商学研究院生会
- 李泰王, "企業システムの日韓比較-雇用の流動化と現地化経営の課題-", 経済論集, (176), pp.21~48 (2008), 愛知大学経済学会
- "APFBBNewsホームページ(2007年6月22日)「トヨタ初の外国人取締役就任」〈" (2007)[URL]
- 大木栄一, "変化する人事管理の理念と人事管理の個別管理化 : 経営者意識調査より(経営学の新世紀:経営学100年の回顧と展望)", 經營學論集, 71, pp.131~136 (2001), 日本経営学会
- 小林英夫, "地域振興における自動車・同部品産業の役割", pp.13~ (2006), 社会評論社
- "軽四輪車新車販売台数の年別･車種別推移" (2009)[URL]
- "表1：二輪車販売台数(国内末端販売店向け出荷台数)"[URL]
- "社団法人日本自動車工業会ホームページ「No.106 日常生活を支える軽自動車」"[URL]
- "トヨタ、退任者を異例の呼び戻し"[URL]
- 周武鉉, "‘混合型’非フォード主義作業組織の形成と進化", 大原社会問題研究所雑誌, (553), pp.1~23 (2004), 大原社会問題研究所
- 砂留洋子, "人事諸制度改革の目的意識の差異に関する調査 : 経営者,人事管理者,職制管理者のインタヴュー調査を中心に", 研究紀要, 1(1), pp.37~53 (2003), 大阪成蹊大学現代経営情報学部
- 竹内規彦, "我が国における中小企業従業員及び経営者の日本型人事管理志向の規定要因：社会学的視点からの検討", 愛知教育大学研究報告. 人文・社会科学, 53, pp.117~127 (2004), 愛知教育大学
- 全在庸, "日韓自動車工場における経営力と競争力の比較研究", 三田商学研究, 42(2), pp.67~88 (1999), 慶應大学商学研究科
- "『選択』2009年9月号", pp.64~66 (2009), 選択出版株式会社
- "会社概要"[URL]
- トヨタ自動車株式会社, "第105期 TOYOTAレポート", pp.6~ (2009), トヨタ自動車株式会社
- "取締役一覧"[URL]
- "役員人事について"[URL]
- "日刊工業新聞、2009年4月24日、第1面", ~
- "『日経ビジネス縮刷版DVD』1982年3月8日号", 152~158
- "会社概要"[URL]
- "日本経済新聞、2009年1月10日、第13面・2009年1月21日、第3面・2009年4月7日、第13面。", ~
- 日野三十四, "トヨタ経営システムの研究-永続的成長の原理-", pp.99~106 (2002), ダイヤモンド社
- "会社概要"[URL]
- フォーイン, , 世界自動車調査月報, (286), pp.1~ (2009)
- 김성홍, "정몽구의 도전", pp.18~ (2005), 고즈윈
- 김정진, "최고경영자 교체에 따른 성과주의 인사제도 변화와 조직성과와의 관계", 조직과 인사관리연구, 31(4), pp.25~48 (2007), 한국인사관리학회
- 김해룡, "이사회와 최고경영자 보상 : 기존 연구의 검토와 상황적 대리인이론 모형의 제안", 人事管理研究, 24(2), pp.25~48 (2001), 한국인사관리학회
- "대한민국 기업정보의 창, DART홈 페이지「사업 보고서」"[URL]
- "정몽구 현대.기아차그룹 회장 ‘수사인사' 의 속뜻은" (2005)[URL]
- 정구현, "한국 기업경영의 20년", pp.175~ (2008), 삼성경제연구소
- "현대차 서병기•최재국 부회장 퇴진"[URL]
- "현대•기아차 올 미국 판매량 닛산쳐"[URL]
- 진희정, "현대 자동차의 힘-SONATA 세계를 누비다-", pp.235~ (2006), 도서출판명성
- 차동옥, "리더십 연구의 최근 동향: CEO 리더십을 중심으로", 조직과 인사관리연구, 29(4), pp.179~227 (2005), 한국인사관리학회
- "현대차 또 ‘돌발 인사’ 부회장 2명 전격 퇴진"[URL]
- "STATISTICS"[URL]
- 한국자동차공업협동조합, "2009 한국자동차산업편람", pp.11~ (2009), 한국자동차공업협동조합
- 최근 자동차 시장동향 및 전망, "한국자동차산업연구소", 20~ (2009)
- "지배구조"[URL]
- "수요격감에 ‘휘청' ①"[URL]
- "돌파구는 없나 ③"[URL]
- "トヨタ自動車に勤務経験のあるB氏(ヨーロッパ部職員)宛インタヴュー調査より、2009年10月8日、東京にて実施", ~ (2009)
- "現代自動車に勤務経験のあるC氏(理事)宛インタヴュー調査より、2009年10月6日、ソウルにて実施。", ~ (2009)