한국과 일본의 자동차산업정책 비교 분석
A comparative study on the automotive industrial policy of Korea and Japan
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is to analyze the role of industrial policy in the development of automotive industry in Korea and Japan. We select significant industrial policies in the development of automotive industry in both countries and compare the target, consequences, and evolution of those policies. Our main findings are as follows. First of all, with confidence in fostering international competitiveness induced by comparative advantage in automotive industry, both Korean and Japanese government have decided to concentrate on promoting automotive industry. Secondly, the induction of foreign capital could make it easier to access advanced technology or to raise funds, but make it harder to keep the independence of management rights or industrial sovereignty. It is worthwhile to note that Hyundai in Korea and Totota in Japan have survived as the best automotive company in each country keeping its independence both in foreign technology and capital. Last but not least, Korea and Japan have shared enlargement as a policy target of structural reform in automotive industry. While private firms' opposition to government policy have made their industrial structures to be competitive in Japan, Korean government have forced its industrial structure to be oligopolistic.
Abstract
This paper is to analyze the role of industrial policy in the development of automotive industry in Korea and Japan. We select significant industrial policies in the development of automotive industry in both countries and compare the target, consequences, and evolution of those policies. Our main findings are as follows. First of all, with confidence in fostering international competitiveness induced by comparative advantage in automotive industry, both Korean and Japanese government have decided to concentrate on promoting automotive industry. Secondly, the induction of foreign capital could make it easier to access advanced technology or to raise funds, but make it harder to keep the independence of management rights or industrial sovereignty. It is worthwhile to note that Hyundai in Korea and Totota in Japan have survived as the best automotive company in each country keeping its independence both in foreign technology and capital. Last but not least, Korea and Japan have shared enlargement as a policy target of structural reform in automotive industry. While private firms' opposition to government policy have made their industrial structures to be competitive in Japan, Korean government have forced its industrial structure to be oligopolistic.
참고문헌 (23)
- 金容福, "경제자유화시기에 있어서 산업조정의 정치 : 한국과 일본의 산업정책과정 비교 연구", 박사, 정치학, pp.1996
- 니시노준야, "한국의 산업정책 변화와 일본으로부터의 학습 : 1960~70년대를 중심으로", 박사, 정치학, pp.2005
- 류재헌, "한국 자동차산업의 전개과정과 자동차자본의 역사적 성격, In 한국자본주의와 자동차산업" (1990), 풀빛
- 박영구, "한국의 중화학공업화: 과정과 내용(1권)-(3권)" (2012), 해남
- 위기극복과 경제도약을 위한 신산업정책연구(1),(2), "산업연구원", ~, pp.미래사회협동연구총서 09-05-01 (2009)
- 신상숙, "한국 자동차산업의 구조 변화와 국가개입의 역할, In 한국자본주의와 자동차산업" (1990), 풀빛
- 吳源哲, "박정희는 어떻게 경제강국 만들었나" (2006), 동서문화사
- 張炳翼, "한·일 자동차산업 정책에 관한 비교연구", 박사, 경제학, pp.1994
- 정몽준, "日本의 政府와 企業관계 - 자동차산업을 중심으로" (1995), 韓國經濟新聞社
- 최홍봉, "현대자동차의 기술추격 전략: 도요타자동차와의 비교를 중심으로", 지역사회연구, 17(1), pp.121~143 (2009), 한국지역사회학회
- 현대자동차주식회사, "現代自動車史" (1992), 현대자동차주식회사
- 현대자동차주식회사, "도전30년 비전21세기" (1997), 현대자동차주식회사
- 藤本隆宏, "日韓自動車産業の形成と産業育成政策(1),(2),(3完)", 経済学論集, 60(1), pp.51~76 (1994)
- 山崎修嗣, "戦後日本の自動車産業政策" (2003), 法律文化社
- 水野順子, "韓國の自動車産業" (1996), アジア經濟硏究所
- トヨタ自動車株式會社, "創造限りなく:トヨタ自動車50年史" (1987), トヨタ自動車株式會社
- Amsden, A.H., "아시아의 다음 巨人", pp.1990~ (1989), (주)시사영어사
- Chang, H. -J., "Rethinking East Asian Industrial Policy - Past Records and Future Prospects, In Industrial Policy, Innovation & Economic Growth" (2001), Singapore Univercity Press
- Chang, H. -J., "사다리 걷어차기" (2004), 부키
- Chang, H.-J., "국가의 역할" (2006), 부키
- Johnson, C., "The MITI and Japanese Miracle : The Growth of Industrial Policy" (1982), Stanford University Press
- Wong, P.K., "Rethinking The Development Paradime: Lesson from Japan and the Four Asian NIEs, In Industrial Policy, Innovation & Economic Growth" (2001), Singapore Univercity Press
- World Bank, "The East Asia Miracle" (1993), Oxford University Press