落日余晖:丁茶山的新人心道心说
Sunset Afterglow: The New Theory of Human Mind and Moral Mind of Ding Chashan
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
丁茶山在早年时曾经接触到以≪天主实义≫为代表的西学, 这对其后来思想走向影响较大,从而构成了在西学和儒学(特别是朝鲜李朝性理学)之间折衷的学术立场。在人心道心问题上,他不赞成基于史学立场的黄宗羲借口≪尚书·大禹谟≫被证伪而否定“十六字心传”的做法,而是倾向于朱子的高度重视该段文字的立场。茶山否定了具有佛学意味的本然之性概念, 而赞成天命之性的提法, 从而构成了其晚年的性说转向。茶山从≪中庸≫出发, 把道心理解为天命之性, 而性则仅仅是嗜好, 这就是著名的“性嗜好说”。在茶山看来, 人是由形、神构成的, 其中神就是灵体/灵魂, 从而由传统的理学命题“气强理弱”转化为“形强神弱”。茶山进而建立了心三层说, 从而赋予了人心道心以新含义, 即道心为性、人心为权衡。不过, 心三层说的框架和人心道心的二元性之间存在明显不对应之处, 这种明显的漏洞或许说明了人心道心问题在茶山那里已经如落日余晖, 不再具有其此前在性理学中的焦点或独立地位。对于韩国儒学中的两大问题:四端七情与道心人心之间的关系, 茶山持有的是同构论立场, 从而区别于栗谷而和退溪站在一起。茶山人心道心思想的特色, 和其新仁说有内在联系。其基本观点是道心是大体, 人心是小体, 而“克己复礼”就是道心克人心或道心为主人心听命。这种强调二心二体二己的“二”恰好和“仁”的基本义“仁者, 人也, 二人为仁”的“二”对应, 这绝不是偶然的。
Abstract
In his early years, Ding Chashan came into contact with Western learning represented by the real meaning of God, which had a great impact on his later ideological trend, thus forming a compromise academic position between Western learning and Confucianism. On the problem of human mind and moral mind, he did not agree with Huang Zongxi's practice of denying the “sixteen character mind-heart biography” on the pretext of the falsification of chapter of Dayu Mo in the Book of Records, which was based on the historical position, but preferred Marster Zhu's position of attaching great importance to the text. Chashan denies the concept of original nature with Buddhist meaning and agrees with the formulation of the nature of heavenly mandate, which constitutes the turning of theory of nature in his later years. Starting from the Book of Mean, Chashan understands the moral mind as the nature of heavenly mandate, while nature is just a hobby, which is the famous “theory of nature addiction”. In Chashan's view, man is composed of body and soul, in which soul is the spirit, so the traditional Neo-Confucianism proposition “Qi is strong and Principal is weak” is transformed into “body is strong and soul is weak”. Chashan further established the three-tier theory of mind-heart, which gives a new meaning to human mind and moral mind, that is, moral mind is nature and human mind is balance. However, there is an obvious mismatch between the framework of the three-tier theory of mind-heart and the duality of human mind and moral mind. This obvious loophole may indicate that the problem of human mind and moral mind has been like the afterglow of the sunset in Chashan and no longer has its previous focus or independent position in human nature theory. For the two major issues in Korean Confucianism: the relationship between the four beginnings and seven emotions and the problem of human mind and moral mind, Chashan holds the position of isomorphism, which is different from Li Gu and stands with Tui Xi. Characteristics of the Chashan's thought of the human mind and moral mind are intrinsically related to his theory of the new benevolence. Its basic view is that the moral mind is the big and the human mind is the small body, and “self-restraint and return to rites” is that the moral mind overcomes the human mind or the former is the ruler and the latter obeys orders. This “two” emphasizing two mind-hearts, two bodies and two self just corresponds to the “two” of “benevolence”, which is the basic meaning of “benevolence”, that is, benevolence, people and two people are benevolence.
참고문헌 (40)
- 黎靖德, "朱子语类" (1986), 中华书局
- 朱熹, "四书章句集注" (1983), 中华书局
- 朱熹, "收入≪朱子全书≫第22册" (2010), 上海古籍出版社、安徽教育出版社
- 罗钦顺, "困知记" (2013), 中华书局
- 李滉, "韩国文集丛刊 第30辑" (1998), 景仁文化社
- 奇大升, "≪高峰集≫(三册) 第三辑" (1989), 民族文化推进会
- 成浑, "韩国文集丛刊 第43辑" (1996), 景仁文化社
- 李珥, "韩国文集丛刊 第44辑" (1996), 景仁文化社
- 丁若镛, "韩国文集丛刊 第282、283辑"
- 丁若镛, "收入≪韩国经学资料集成≫ 第27册" (1988), 成均馆大学校大东文化研究院
- 黄俊杰, "东亚视域中的茶山学与朝鲜儒学" (2006), 台湾大学出版中心
- Chun-chieh Huang, "The Role of Dasan Learning in the Making of East Asian Confucianisms: A Twenty -First Century Perspective.East Asian Confucianisms:Text in Contexts", pp.81~92 (2010), National Taiwan University Press
- 杨儒宾, "异议的意义:近世东亚的反理学思潮" (2012), 台大出版中心
- 蔡振丰, "朝鲜儒者丁若镛的四书学——以东亚为视野的讨论" (2012), 华东师范大学出版社
- 李明辉, "四端与七情:关于道德情感的比较哲学探讨" (2008), 华东师范大学出版社
- 李明辉, "收入≪康德伦理学与孟子道德思考之重建≫" (2004), 中央研究院中国文哲研究所
- 林月惠, "异曲同调:朱子学与朝鲜性理学" (2010), 台大出版中心
- 杨祖汉, "从当代儒学观点看韩国儒学的重要论争" (2005), 台湾大学出版中心
- 杨祖汉, "从当代儒学观点看韩国儒学的重要论争续编" (2017), 台湾大学人文社会高等研究院东亚儒学研究中心
- 陈来, "东亚儒学九论" (2008), 三联书店
- 蒙培元, "丁若镛的 ‘仁学观’", 다산학, (8), pp.7~26 (2006), 재단법인다산학술문화재단
- 谢晓东, "宋明理学中的道心人心问题——心学和朱熹的思想比较", 厦门大学学报(哲社版), (6) (2009)
- 谢晓东, "朱子<文集>与<语类>中几则重要材料年代新考", 中国哲学史, (1) (2014)
- 谢晓东, "人心道心相为始终说是李栗谷的最终定论吗", 中国哲学史, (2) (2015)
- 谢晓东, "李栗谷对人心、道心的诠释", 学术月刊, (11) (2015)
- 谢晓东, "李栗谷<人心道心图说>中的“图”纠错", 中国哲学史, (1) (2017)
- 사효동(谢晓东), "韩南塘的人心道心思想研究", 율곡학연구, 32, pp.141~180 (2016), (사)율곡학회
- 谢晓东, "朱熹与 “四端亦有不中节”问题 ———兼论恻隐之心、情境与两种伦理学的分野", 哲学研究, (4) (2017)
- 谢晓东, "论丁愚潭对李栗谷的批判-以人心道心相为始终说为中心-", 태동고전연구, 42, pp.121~158 (2019), 태동고전연구소[DOI]
- 李基镛, "栗谷李珥의人心道心论研究", 博士, 哲学科, pp.1995
- 金 玟, "朱熹与丁若镛“道心人心论”之比较研究", 博士, pp.2019
- 白敏祯, "丁若镛哲学思想研究" (2013), 苏州大学出版社
- 柳初夏, "四端七情论", pp.369~391 (2019), 中央研究院中国文哲研究所
- 李光虎, "茶山的四书经学", pp.241~261 (2008), 商务印书馆国际有限公司
- 이광호, "退溪 李滉의 心學的 理學이 茶山 丁若鏞의 道德論 形成에 미친 影響", 한국실학연구, (12), pp.23~46 (2006), 한국실학학회
- 崔英辰, "韩国儒学思想研究" (2008), 东方出版社
- 이영경, "정약용의 人心道心論의 윤리적 특성", 대동철학, (48), pp.53~73 (2009), 대동철학회
- 안영상, "토미즘과 비교를 통해서 본 정약용의 인심도심론", 한국실학연구, (9), pp.219~260 (2005), 한국실학학회
- 高桥亨, "朝鲜支那の文化研究", pp.141~281 (1929), 刀江书院
- 利玛窦, "天主实义今注" (2015), 商务印书馆
