본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘증인’의 조건과 ‘행동과 연대’의 가능성: 김붕구 ‘증인문학론’과 앙드레 말로의 관계를 중심으로

Qualifications of ‘Witness’ and a Possibility of ‘Action and Solidarity’

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

‘The literature of the witness’ suggested by Kim BoongKu is a renaming of existentialist literature that focuses on Andre Malraux and Albert Camus. Kim argued that post-war Korean literature could be the literature of the witness which was regarded as World Literature at that time. An event such as war could not be explained by reason and logic. A witness is a person who experienced this tragic event. Nevertheless, the witness does not merely indulge in nihilism but testifies against violence and absurdity and acts based on humanism. Therefore, Kim thought that Korean writers who had experienced the Korean War were qualified to be witnesses and that they should be a witnesses. Kim regarded Malraux's novels such as Les Conquerants and La Condition humaine as the classic exercise of ‘the literature of the witness’ and picked the Chinese terrorist Tchen of La Condition humaine as a typical witness. Kim, however, absorbed Malraux's prejudice that westerners can act and Asians cannot. Even the act of the Chinese terrorist is based on such dichotomy and the order of rank between empire and colony. Moreover, the Chinese terrorist could not show any solidarity with other western comrades and the Chinese people. As stated above, although the Chinese terrorist experienced the tragic event, he did not satisfy the other conditions of a witness: act and solidarity. Kim picked the Chinese terrorist who is contradictory to the literature of the witness instead of picking communistic revolutionists who acted based on conviction and solidarity. He could not make a communistic revolutionist a model of witness because of the Korean War experience and anti-communism prevalent at that time. The war experience had given the post-war Korean literature a chance to become world literature such as existentialist literature, but at the same time, anti-communism and absolutizing the war experience had stifled the unconstrained and diverse envisioning for a blueprint of Korean literature.

Abstract

‘The literature of the witness’ suggested by Kim BoongKu is a renaming of existentialist literature that focuses on Andre Malraux and Albert Camus. Kim argued that post-war Korean literature could be the literature of the witness which was regarded as World Literature at that time. An event such as war could not be explained by reason and logic. A witness is a person who experienced this tragic event. Nevertheless, the witness does not merely indulge in nihilism but testifies against violence and absurdity and acts based on humanism. Therefore, Kim thought that Korean writers who had experienced the Korean War were qualified to be witnesses and that they should be a witnesses. Kim regarded Malraux's novels such as Les Conquerants and La Condition humaine as the classic exercise of ‘the literature of the witness’ and picked the Chinese terrorist Tchen of La Condition humaine as a typical witness. Kim, however, absorbed Malraux's prejudice that westerners can act and Asians cannot. Even the act of the Chinese terrorist is based on such dichotomy and the order of rank between empire and colony. Moreover, the Chinese terrorist could not show any solidarity with other western comrades and the Chinese people. As stated above, although the Chinese terrorist experienced the tragic event, he did not satisfy the other conditions of a witness: act and solidarity. Kim picked the Chinese terrorist who is contradictory to the literature of the witness instead of picking communistic revolutionists who acted based on conviction and solidarity. He could not make a communistic revolutionist a model of witness because of the Korean War experience and anti-communism prevalent at that time. The war experience had given the post-war Korean literature a chance to become world literature such as existentialist literature, but at the same time, anti-communism and absolutizing the war experience had stifled the unconstrained and diverse envisioning for a blueprint of Korean literature.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 김건우, "사상계와 1950년대 문학" (2003), 소명출판
  2. 박지영, "번역된 냉전, 그리고 혁명; 사르트르, 마르크시즘, 실존과 혁명", 서강인문논총, (31), pp.89~135 (2011), 인문과학연구소
  3. 고명철, "논쟁, 비평의 응전" (2006), 보고사
  4. 홍성식, "1960년대 한국문학 논쟁 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2000
  5. 한강희, "1960년대 한국문학비평 연구 : 전통론·세대론·참여론을 중심으로", 박사, 국문학, pp.1998
  6. 변광배, "‘순수⋅참여문학’ 논쟁 재탐사-사르트르의 『문학이란 무엇인가』를 중심으로-", 인문과학, (52), pp.5~26 (2013), 인문학연구원
  7. 장성규, "프랑스 문예사조의 수용과 새로운 전후문학의 기획-김붕구의 비평을 중심으로-", 한국학연구, (35), pp.239~264 (2014), 한국학연구소
  8. 이진영, "전후 한국문학의 실존주의 고찰 - 부정과 참여 의식을 중심으로 -", 한국문예비평연구, (47), pp.139~162 (2015), 한국현대문예비평학회
  9. Robert Young, "The postcolonial Comparative", PMLA, 128(3), pp.686~687 (2013), Modern Language Association of America
  10. 김붕구, "한국인과 문학사상", pp.106~ (1964), 일조각
  11. 김붕구, "불문학산고" (1958), 신태양사출판국
  12. 김붕구, "불문학산고", pp.274~275 (1958), 신태양사출판국
  13. 김붕구, "작가와 사회" (1973), 일조각
  14. 김석수, "맑시즘과 실존주의 수용에서 본 한국 현대(1920~60년대) 정신의 갈등 구조", 가톨릭철학, (1), pp.218~256 (1999), 한국가톨릭철학회
  15. 나종석, "1950년대 실존주의 수용사 연구-'교양'으로서의 실존주의를 중심으로", 헤겔연구, (27), pp.241~272 (2010), 한국헤겔학회[DOI]
  16. 김붕구, "證言으로서의 文學", 사상계, 82 (1960)
  17. 김붕구, "증인의 문학: 앙드레 말로의 경우", 사상계, 89 (1958)
  18. Marie-Paule Ha, "The Cultural Other in Malraux's Asian Novels", The French Review, 71(1), pp.33~ (1997)
  19. 앙드레 말로, "인간의 조건", pp.86~ (2000), 지식공작소
  20. 김붕구, "앙드레 말로 연구", 인문논집, 7, pp.42~ (1981)
  21. 배기열, "고뇌와 고독, 죽음과 운명의 의미: 앙드레 말로의 「인간의 조건」 해제", 외대어문논총, 7, pp.11~ (1955)
  22. 이경해, "앙드레 말로(Andre Malraux)의 「인간의 조건」에 나타난 운명의 도피방법: 파스칼적 요소", 동대논총, 22, pp.45~ (1992)
  23. 앙드레 말로, "정복자", pp.281~283 (1990), 금성사
  24. 김진규, "선을 못 넘은 ‘자발적 미수자’와 선을 넘은 ‘임의의 인물’ - 최인훈의 『광장』(1961)과 홋타 요시에의 『광장의 고독』(1951)", 상허학보, 40, pp.241~275 (2014), 상허학회
  25. 김붕구, "휴머니즘의 再建: 까뮤를 中心으로 한 批判", 자유문학 (1958)
  26. 김붕구, "니힐리즘을 넘어서 까뮈의 『正午의 思想』", 세계 (1960)
  27. 김붕구, "맑스主義敎理와 實存的 휴머니즘", 사상계, 90, pp.294~295 (1961)
  28. 김붕구, "앙드레 말로의 大回歸와 逆離脫: 전기연구", 佛語佛文學硏究, 20 (1985)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)