조선시대 장서목록을 통해 본 규장각 소장 경부(經部) 문헌의 가치
On the Merit of Kyujanggak Collection of Confucian Classics from the Bibliographical Perspective of Joseon Dynasty
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The article evaluates the Kyujanggak collection of Confucian Classics rest on the basis of the bibliography of Joseon Dynasty. Firstly, from the aspect of records, editor’s comments in Kyujang Chongmok show significance of proposing overall view of books when tracking down their academic sources, or sometimes further develop into criticizing certain academic traditions . Next, we should pay special attention to those versions which the Korean edition(東本) differs from the Chinese edition(華本) preserved by the royal library . Korean editions more or less present distinctions from the Chinese editions, it is necessary to pick up the important ones to have them photocopied. Moreover, the article suggests a hypothesis of “Nam(南)” tagged in Seogo Catalogue, hoping to bring further discussion. Finally, on the content, emphasis on texts about Four Books and Ritual Studies demonstrates its unique feature. When compared with folk collection of books, it would become clearer that there is relation between great tradition and little tradition, and illustrative works on ritual studies composed by Joseon scholars are exactly the representative of communication between the two traditions.
Abstract
The article evaluates the Kyujanggak collection of Confucian Classics rest on the basis of the bibliography of Joseon Dynasty. Firstly, from the aspect of records, editor’s comments in Kyujang Chongmok show significance of proposing overall view of books when tracking down their academic sources, or sometimes further develop into criticizing certain academic traditions . Next, we should pay special attention to those versions which the Korean edition(東本) differs from the Chinese edition(華本) preserved by the royal library . Korean editions more or less present distinctions from the Chinese editions, it is necessary to pick up the important ones to have them photocopied. Moreover, the article suggests a hypothesis of “Nam(南)” tagged in Seogo Catalogue, hoping to bring further discussion. Finally, on the content, emphasis on texts about Four Books and Ritual Studies demonstrates its unique feature. When compared with folk collection of books, it would become clearer that there is relation between great tradition and little tradition, and illustrative works on ritual studies composed by Joseon scholars are exactly the representative of communication between the two traditions.
참고문헌 (30)
- 李修生, "全元文 제27책 권860", pp.60~, 鳳凰出版社
- 陶宗儀, "南村輟耕錄 권7", pp.91~ (1959), 中華書局
- "雁門集 권11", pp.310~311 (1982), 上海古籍出版社
- 서울대학교규장각, "奎章閣圖書韓國本綜合目錄․解題", pp.7~12 (1994), 보경문화사
- 한국 국사편찬위원회, "朝鮮王朝實錄 제45책", pp.249~ (1958)
- "林園十六志 제45책", pp.37~ (2005), 보경문화사
- "승정원일기", ~
- 정호훈, "『奎章總目』과 18세기 후반 조선의 外來知識 集成", 한국문화, (57), pp.91~125 (2012), 규장각한국학연구원
- "朝鮮時代書目叢刊 제1책", pp.14~ (2004), 中華書局
- "初學記 제3책 권21, ｢文部․經典｣", pp.497~ (1962), 中華書局
- "文淵閣四庫全書", 台灣商務印書館, ~
- 孫猛, "郡齋讀書志校證 권10", pp.418~ (1990), 上海古籍出版社
- "直齋書錄解題 권3, ｢語孟類｣", pp.72~ (1987), 上海古籍出版社
- 周予同, "周予同經學史論著選集", pp.290~ (1983), 上海人民出版社
- 黃汝成, "日知錄集釋 권18 ‘十三經註疏’조", pp.1368~1369 (1985), 上海古籍出版社
- 永瑢, "四庫全書總目 권66", pp.584~ (1965), 中華書局
- "台山集 권8", pp.431~ (2002), 경인문화사
- 南權熙, "奎章閣 西庫의 書目과 藏書 변천 分析 : 현존 書目을 中心으로", 석사, pp.1983
- 任埅, "水村集 권11, ｢先考今是堂府君行狀｣", pp.250~ (1995), 경인문화사
- 徐瀅修, "明臯全集 권14", pp.302~ (2001), 경인문화사
- "韓國文集叢刊 제293책", pp.357~, 경인문화사
- 林基中, "燕行錄全集』 제51책", pp.194~195 (2001), 동국대학교출판부
- 藤塚鄰, "清朝文化東傳の研究: 嘉慶․道光學壇と李朝の金阮堂" (1975), 國書刊行會
- 손계영, "동춘당 후손가 가전 家藏書籍簿의 작성시기에 대한 고찰", 서지학연구, (38), pp.193~225 (2007), 한국서지학회[DOI]
- "韓國文集叢刊 제259책", pp.220~ (2000), 경인문화사
- "章學誠遺書", pp.95~ (1985), 文物出版社
- "柏梘山房文集 권6", pp.128~129 (2005), 上海古籍出版社
- 黃國聲, "陳澧集 제2책", pp.357~ (2008), 上海古籍出版社
- 홍한주, "智水拈筆 권1", pp.7~ (1984), 아세아문화사
- 王瑩, "農民社會與文化 제3장", pp.115~ (2013), 中國社會科學出版社