본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

가마를 탈 것인가 말을 탈 것인가? 조서와 칙서를 함께 맞이할 것인가 별도로 맞이할 것인가?

Conflict and Its Characteristics between Joseon Court and Ming envoy Surrounding YeongJochik(迎詔勅) ritual in 1488

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

On March 13, 1488, the king of Joseon received a Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) at Gyeongbok Palace. Unlike the previous events, Joseon and Ming envoys were at odds over the procedures of welcoming Joseo and Chikseo, specifically two issues. Joseon and Ming envoys were at odds over what means of transportation the king should travel from Mohwaquan(慕華館) to the royal palace to receive Joseo, claiming palanquin or horse, respectively. With a method to greet Joseo and Chikseo that came together, Joseon urged collective greeting, while Ming envoys suggested separate greeting. The conflict over these issues was unusual. In the meantime, the king traveled to the palace on a palanquin when he greeted Joseo. Also the king greeted Joseo and Chikseo, that came together, at once. Joseo and Chikseo were moved to the palace together, and the king received Joseo and Chikseo in turn at the palace. Until the Ming Dynasty envoys took issue with it in 1488, no matter whether it was the envoys of the Ming Dynasty or the Joseon Dynasty, no one had ever questioned the king’s palanquin riding and collective greeting of Joseo and Chikseo. The 1488 conflict between Joseon and Ming envoys over the process of welcoming Joseo and Chikseo began when Ming envoys to Joseon took issue unusually. The Joseon Dynasty did not accept the opinions of the envoys and the envoys did not budge from their views, therefore conflicts arose. The dispute continued because the two sides failed to narrow their differences, and the dispute ended by reaching a dead end and making one-sided concessions without compromise. In the former, Joseon’s view was accepted and the king rode a palanquin in greeting Joseo as is customary. In the latter, in accepting the views of Ming convoys, the king of the Joseon Dynasty went to Mohwaquan to greet Joseo, to the Gyeongbok Palace by palanquin, to receive Joseo. After that, the king greeted Chikseo again from Mohwaquan, to take the horse, to the Gyeongbok Palace, and to receive Chikseo. The article aims to break away from the conventional view of the conflict over diplomatic ritual between Joseon and Ming(envoys) as a power game. The conflict came amid a consensus between the two sides to realize the ‘right’ ritual in terms of the implementation of civilization Chunghwa(中華). The conflict was caused by the fact that their respective practices were in line with right manners on some ceremonial procedures where the ‘right’ practice does not exist clearly.

Abstract

On March 13, 1488, the king of Joseon received a Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) at Gyeongbok Palace. Unlike the previous events, Joseon and Ming envoys were at odds over the procedures of welcoming Joseo and Chikseo, specifically two issues. Joseon and Ming envoys were at odds over what means of transportation the king should travel from Mohwaquan(慕華館) to the royal palace to receive Joseo, claiming palanquin or horse, respectively. With a method to greet Joseo and Chikseo that came together, Joseon urged collective greeting, while Ming envoys suggested separate greeting. The conflict over these issues was unusual. In the meantime, the king traveled to the palace on a palanquin when he greeted Joseo. Also the king greeted Joseo and Chikseo, that came together, at once. Joseo and Chikseo were moved to the palace together, and the king received Joseo and Chikseo in turn at the palace. Until the Ming Dynasty envoys took issue with it in 1488, no matter whether it was the envoys of the Ming Dynasty or the Joseon Dynasty, no one had ever questioned the king’s palanquin riding and collective greeting of Joseo and Chikseo. The 1488 conflict between Joseon and Ming envoys over the process of welcoming Joseo and Chikseo began when Ming envoys to Joseon took issue unusually. The Joseon Dynasty did not accept the opinions of the envoys and the envoys did not budge from their views, therefore conflicts arose. The dispute continued because the two sides failed to narrow their differences, and the dispute ended by reaching a dead end and making one-sided concessions without compromise. In the former, Joseon’s view was accepted and the king rode a palanquin in greeting Joseo as is customary. In the latter, in accepting the views of Ming convoys, the king of the Joseon Dynasty went to Mohwaquan to greet Joseo, to the Gyeongbok Palace by palanquin, to receive Joseo. After that, the king greeted Chikseo again from Mohwaquan, to take the horse, to the Gyeongbok Palace, and to receive Chikseo. The article aims to break away from the conventional view of the conflict over diplomatic ritual between Joseon and Ming(envoys) as a power game. The conflict came amid a consensus between the two sides to realize the ‘right’ ritual in terms of the implementation of civilization Chunghwa(中華). The conflict was caused by the fact that their respective practices were in line with right manners on some ceremonial procedures where the ‘right’ practice does not exist clearly.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 최종석, "鞠躬인가 五拜三叩頭인가?: 조서를 맞이하는 예식을 둘러싼 조선과 명 사신 간의갈등에 관한 탐색", 한국문화, (83), pp.227~263 (2018), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  2. 최종석, "고려말기⋅조선초기 迎詔儀禮에 관한 새로운 이해 모색 -『蕃國儀注』의 소개와 복원-", 민족문화연구, (69), pp.269~309 (2015), 민족문화연구원[DOI]
  3. 최종석, "조선초기 迎詔禮 운영과『蕃國儀注』", 역사와 담론, (86), pp.139~177 (2018), 호서사학회
  4. "고려사 권65, 지19 예7 빈례 迎北朝詔使儀와 迎北朝起復告勅使儀", ~
  5. 김한규, "사조선록(使朝鮮錄) 연구" (2011), 서강대학교 출판부
  6. 이규철, "특집 : 조선 성종대 외교의례 변경에 대한 논의와 대명의식", 역사와 현실, (98), pp.169~197 (2015), 한국역사연구회
  7. "大明集禮 卷32, 賓禮3", ~
  8. "세종실록", ~
  9. 岩井茂樹, "明代中國の禮制覇權主義と東アジアの秩序", 東洋文化, 85 (2005)
  10. 檀上寬, "明代海禁=朝貢システムと華夷秩序" (2013), 京都大學學術出版會
  11. 조영록, "鮮初의 朝鮮出身明使考: 成宗朝의 對明交涉과 明使鄭同", 국사관논총, 14 (1990)
  12. 정동훈, "명초 국제질서의 재편과 고려의 위상 –홍무 연간 명의 사신 인선을 중심으로–", 역사와 현실, (89), pp.113~150 (2013), 한국역사연구회
  13. 정동훈, "永樂帝의 말과 글 - 영락 연간 조선-명 관계의 두 층위 -", 한국문화, (78), pp.151~182 (2017), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  14. 杜慧月, "求同在異邦: 明代文臣使朝鮮錄論略", 淵民學志, 21 (2014)
  15. "성종실록", ~
  16. "明世宗實錄 卷114", ~
  17. 郭嘉輝, "天下通禮: 明代賓禮的流傳與域外實踐的紛爭", 臺灣師大歷史學報, 59, pp.6~ (2018)
  18. "大明會典 卷58, 禮部 行人司 儀制清吏司 蕃國禮", ~
  19. 윤재환, "董越의 「朝鮮賦」를 통해 본 中國 使臣의 朝鮮 認識", 동방한문학, (53), pp.179~212 (2012), 동방한문학회[DOI]
  20. 신태영, "明使 董越의 「朝鮮賦」에 나타난 朝鮮認識", 漢文學報, 10 (2004)
  21. "대명집례 권32, 賓禮3", ~
  22. "國朝五禮儀 권3, 嘉禮 迎勅書儀", ~
  23. 윤승희, "고려 말 명 사신 영접의례의 성립- 迎大明賜勞使儀와 迎大明無詔勅使儀를 중심으로-", 한국중세사연구, (55), pp.571~599 (2018), 한국중세사학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)