본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

非禮와 尊王의 사이에서: 조선 성종~명종 대 詔勅合迎과 迎勅 시 乘輦의 성취와 그 의미

The Fulfillment of Greeting Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) at once and Riding a Palanquin in Greeting Chikseo(勅書) in the King Sŏngjong to Myeongjong period, and Its Meaning

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

I has reviewed the conflicts between Chosŏn and Ming Dynasty envoys over some of the rituals greeting Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書), as part of figuring out what kind of mentality Chosŏn performed diplomatic rites in the process of dealing with Ming Dynasty(Emperor). In previous studies, conflicts between Chosŏn and Ming envoys over some of the rituals have been regarded as a power game between the two countries, but such an approach did not fit the context of the times. In other words, both Chosŏn and Ming Dynasty envoys had a consensus to realize ‘correct’ Li(禮), but for some procedures where ‘correct’ Li(禮) practiced clearly did not exist, each insisted that their practice conformed to Li(禮). As a result, these conflicts arose. From this point of view, I investigated that after the acceptance of the method of separately greeting Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) in the reign of King Sŏngjong(the king riding a horse when greeting Chikseo related to this), Chosŏn overturned this acceptance and then the king rode a palanquin to greet both Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) at once, and even the procedure of riding in a palanquin was finally realized even when greeting Chikseo(勅書). Specifically, the process by which the king rode a palanquin to greet both Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) at once, and the achievement of riding the palanquin even when greeting Chikseo(勅書) and how this achievement was achieved was reviewed, and I tried to identify the historical context and meaning of this process. In particular, I examined the context in which unusually, the Chosŏn government went so far as to break ritual rules and implemented the practice of having the king ride on a palanquin instead of a horse when greeting Chikseo(勅書), and the context in which it also justified riding a palanquin when the Chosŏn government was greeting a Chikseo(勅書). Previous studies have assumed that a deepening and transformation of Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming at some point in time, and have used Chosŏn’s acceptance of Ming Dynasty envoys’ claims as an indicator of the deepening and transformation of Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming, focusing on the action of Chosŏn’s acceptance of Ming Dynasty envoys’ claims and attributing significance to it as a trigger for the deepening and transformation of Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming. However, this paper, which also examined the post-acceptance of aspect of Ming Dynasty envoys’ claims, suggests that Chosŏn’s choice and will were decisive in the outcome of the conflict between Chosŏn and Ming envoys. It should not be judged as an opportunity to deepen and transform the Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming.

Abstract

I has reviewed the conflicts between Chosŏn and Ming Dynasty envoys over some of the rituals greeting Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書), as part of figuring out what kind of mentality Chosŏn performed diplomatic rites in the process of dealing with Ming Dynasty(Emperor). In previous studies, conflicts between Chosŏn and Ming envoys over some of the rituals have been regarded as a power game between the two countries, but such an approach did not fit the context of the times. In other words, both Chosŏn and Ming Dynasty envoys had a consensus to realize ‘correct’ Li(禮), but for some procedures where ‘correct’ Li(禮) practiced clearly did not exist, each insisted that their practice conformed to Li(禮). As a result, these conflicts arose. From this point of view, I investigated that after the acceptance of the method of separately greeting Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) in the reign of King Sŏngjong(the king riding a horse when greeting Chikseo related to this), Chosŏn overturned this acceptance and then the king rode a palanquin to greet both Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) at once, and even the procedure of riding in a palanquin was finally realized even when greeting Chikseo(勅書). Specifically, the process by which the king rode a palanquin to greet both Joseo(詔書) and Chikseo(勅書) at once, and the achievement of riding the palanquin even when greeting Chikseo(勅書) and how this achievement was achieved was reviewed, and I tried to identify the historical context and meaning of this process. In particular, I examined the context in which unusually, the Chosŏn government went so far as to break ritual rules and implemented the practice of having the king ride on a palanquin instead of a horse when greeting Chikseo(勅書), and the context in which it also justified riding a palanquin when the Chosŏn government was greeting a Chikseo(勅書). Previous studies have assumed that a deepening and transformation of Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming at some point in time, and have used Chosŏn’s acceptance of Ming Dynasty envoys’ claims as an indicator of the deepening and transformation of Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming, focusing on the action of Chosŏn’s acceptance of Ming Dynasty envoys’ claims and attributing significance to it as a trigger for the deepening and transformation of Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming. However, this paper, which also examined the post-acceptance of aspect of Ming Dynasty envoys’ claims, suggests that Chosŏn’s choice and will were decisive in the outcome of the conflict between Chosŏn and Ming envoys. It should not be judged as an opportunity to deepen and transform the Sadae(事大) consciousness toward Ming.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 최종석, "고려말기⋅조선초기 迎詔儀禮에 관한 새로운 이해 모색 -『蕃國儀注』의 소개와 복원-", 민족문화연구, (69), pp.269~309 (2015), 민족문화연구원[DOI]
  2. 권인용, "15~19세기 중국인의 조선 인식" (2005), 고구려연구재단
  3. 계승범, "파병 논의를 통해 본 조선전기 對明觀의 변화", 대동문화연구, (53), pp.309~346 (2006), 대동문화연구원
  4. 소종, "명나라 사신 공용경(龔用卿)의 조선사행연구", 역사문화논총, 6 (2010)
  5. 유바다, "朝鮮 初期 迎詔勅 관련 儀註의 성립과 朝明關係", 역사민속학, (40), pp.123~160 (2012), 한국역사민속학회
  6. 김한규, "사조선록(使朝鮮錄) 연구" (2011), 서강대학교 출판부
  7. 전세영, "명대(明代) 중국의 조선관(朝鮮觀) 연구 -명사(明史) 「조선열전(朝鮮列傳)」을 중심으로-", 21세기정치학회보, 21(1), pp.1~22 (2011), 21세기정치학회[DOI]
  8. 이규철, "특집 : 조선 성종대 외교의례 변경에 대한 논의와 대명의식", 역사와 현실, (98), pp.169~197 (2015), 한국역사연구회
  9. 최종석, "조선초기 迎詔禮 운영과『蕃國儀注』", 역사와 담론, (86), pp.139~177 (2018), 호서사학회
  10. 최종석, "鞠躬인가 五拜三叩頭인가?: 조서를 맞이하는 예식을 둘러싼 조선과 명 사신 간의갈등에 관한 탐색", 한국문화, (83), pp.227~263 (2018), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  11. 최종석, "가마를 탈 것인가 말을 탈 것인가? 조서와 칙서를 함께 맞이할 것인가 별도로 맞이할 것인가?", 한국문화, (87), pp.87~124 (2019), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  12. "세종실록", ~
  13. "국조오례의 권3", ~
  14. "성종실록", ~
  15. 김한규, "사조선록(使朝鮮錄) 연구" (2011), 서강대학교 출판부
  16. 송웅섭, "중종대 사대의식과 유교화의 심화 - ‘『중종의 시대』’의 사대와 유교화에 대한 이해 -", 조선시대사학보, (74), pp.363~405 (2015), 조선시대사학회
  17. 최종석, "고려에서 조선으로" (2019), 역사비평사
  18. "태종실록 권21", ~
  19. "선조실록 권127", ~
  20. "연산군일기", ~
  21. "孝宗敬皇帝實錄 卷99", ~
  22. "明史 卷180, 列傳68 王獻臣", ~
  23. "중종실록", ~
  24. 김경록, "中宗反正이후 承襲外交와 朝明關係", 한국문화, (40), pp.211~247 (2007), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  25. 구도영, "中宗代 對明외교의 추이와 정치적 의도", 조선시대사학보, (54), pp.89~127 (2010), 조선시대사학회
  26. "天使一路日記", ~
  27. "인종실록", ~
  28. "명종실록", ~
  29. 최종석, "告哀․稱嗣에서 告訃ㆍ請諡ㆍ請承襲으로 - 고려전기와 조선초기 국상 시 책봉국에 행한 외교의례를 비교하며 -", 한국문화, (99), pp.131~164 (2022), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  30. "선조수정실록 권1", ~
  31. 허태구, "병자호란과 예, 그리고 중화" (2019), 소명출판

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)