The Zhonghua Community Strategy in the Early Joseon Dynasty: The Establishment of Rituals and the Change in Ming’s Attitude toward Joseon
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article will explain the Zhonghua community strategy and its impact on the formation of the self-identity of Joseon’s political elites, and the resulting change in the Ming court’s attitude toward the Joseon dynasty. The architect of the institutions of the early Joseon dynasty, Jeong Dojeon, insisted the Joseon dynasty should internalize Confucian moral values and become the model tributary in this world order. His plan was materialized by kings of the early Joseon dynasty. Among various policies, the establishment of new rituals was the key project of the Zhonghua community strategy. The political elites of the early Joseon dynasty prided themselves on representing the country of courtesy. In the mid-Ming period, the Ming court accepted Joseon’s claim, and began treating it as a civilized country distinctive from other barbarian nations. Far from being a purely anachronistic policy of a distant period, this “Zhonghua community strategy” of the early Joseon dynasty can be taken as a reference point for understanding the policy-making of modern Korea.
Abstract
This article will explain the Zhonghua community strategy and its impact on the formation of the self-identity of Joseon’s political elites, and the resulting change in the Ming court’s attitude toward the Joseon dynasty. The architect of the institutions of the early Joseon dynasty, Jeong Dojeon, insisted the Joseon dynasty should internalize Confucian moral values and become the model tributary in this world order. His plan was materialized by kings of the early Joseon dynasty. Among various policies, the establishment of new rituals was the key project of the Zhonghua community strategy. The political elites of the early Joseon dynasty prided themselves on representing the country of courtesy. In the mid-Ming period, the Ming court accepted Joseon’s claim, and began treating it as a civilized country distinctive from other barbarian nations. Far from being a purely anachronistic policy of a distant period, this “Zhonghua community strategy” of the early Joseon dynasty can be taken as a reference point for understanding the policy-making of modern Korea.
참고문헌 (35)
- ")" (1997)[URL]
- "Jungjong sillok 中宗實錄 (Veritable Records of King Jungjong)", ~
- Kang, Huimaeng, ")" (1999), Sejong daewang ginyeom saeophoe
- "Sejong sillok 世宗實錄 (Veritable Records of King Sejong)", ~
- "Shizong shilu (明)世宗實錄 (Veritable Records of the Shizong of the Ming Dynasty)", ~
- "Taejo sillok 太祖實錄 (Veritable Records of King Taejo)", ~
- "Taejong sillok 太宗實錄 (Veritable Records of King Taejong)", ~
- 최종석, "조선초기 ‘時王之制’ 논의 구조의 특징과 중화 보편의 추구", 조선시대사학보, (52), pp.5~49 (2010), 조선시대사학회
- 최종석, "조선초기 국가 위상과 ‘聲敎自由’", 한국사연구, (162), pp.3~44 (2013), 한국사연구회
- Choi, Jongseok, "Goryeo-eseo Joseon-euro (From Goryeo to Joseon)", pp.212~249 (2019), Yeoksa bipyeongsa
- 최연식, "조공체제의 변동과 조선시대 중화-사대 관념의 굴절: 변화 속의 지속", 한국정치학회보, 41(1), pp.101~121 (2007), 한국정치학회[DOI]
- Chun, Chae-Sung, "Theoretical Approaches to Alliance: Implications on the R.O.K-US Alliance", Journal of International and Area Studies, 7(2), pp.71~88 (2000)
- Fairbank, J. Κ., "The Chinese World Order" (2013), Harvard University Press
- Fairbank, J. Κ, "On the Ch’ing tributary system", Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 6(2), pp.135~246 (1941)
- Guksa pyeonchan wiwonhoe(National Institute of Korea History), "Korean History)" (2003), Guksa pyeonchan wiwonhoe
- 정동훈, "正統帝의 등극과 조선-명 관계의 큰 변화: 조선 세종대 양국 관계 안정화의 한 배경", 한국문화, (90), pp.97~127 (2020), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 주현호, "Rethinking China-Centered Culturalism and the Tribute System from an East Asian Perspective", 서강인문논총, (45), pp.419~444 (2016), 인문과학연구소
- Kang, David C., "East Asia before the West : Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute" (2010), Columbia University Press
- 김선민, "‘外國’과 ‘屬國’의 사이 ― 正史를 통해 본 청의 조선 인식 ―", 사림, (41), pp.65~100 (2012), 수선사학회
- 김영진, "전통 동아시아 국제질서 개념으로서 조공체제에 대한 비판적 고찰", 한국정치외교사논총, 38(1), pp.249~279 (2016), 한국정치외교사학회[DOI]
- 구도영, "조선 전기 朝明외교관계의 함수, ‘禮義之國’", 대동문화연구, (89), pp.159~204 (2015), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
- Koo, Doyoung, "16-segi han-jung muyeok yeongu: Hondon-ui dongasia, yeui-ui nara Joseon-ui daemyeong muyeok (A Study of Sino-Korean Trade in the Sixteenth Century: Trade between Ming and Joseon, the Country of Courtesy, in an East Asia of Upheaval)" (2018), Taehaksa
- Kye, Seungbum, "Jungjong-ui-sidae : Joseon-eun eotteoke yugyo gukga-ga doeeonneunga(Era of Jungjong : How Joseon Became a Confucian Country)" (2014), Yeoksa bipyeongsa
- Kirk W. Larsen, "Comforting Fictions: The Tribute System, the Westphalian Order, and Sino-Korean Relations", Journal of East Asian Studies, 13(2), pp.233~257 (2013), 동아시아연구원
- 이규철, "조선 태종대 대명의식과 여진 정벌(征伐)", 만주연구, (17), pp.73~96 (2014), 만주학회[DOI]
- 이규철, "조선초기 대명정보의 활용과 사행(使行) 파견", 백산학보, (125), pp.161~184 (2023), 백산학회[DOI]
- Mancall, Mark, "China at the Center : 300 years of Foreign Policy" (1984), Free Press
- Nan, Bingwen, "Mingshi 明史 (History of the Ming Dynasty). Vol. 1" (2003), Shanghai Renmin Press
- Park, Hongkyu, "Sambong jeongdojeon : Saengae-wa sasang(Thought and Life Story of Jeongdojeon)" (2016), Seonbi
- 박홍규, "중화공동체 전략과 세종대 조선 문명: 예(禮) 문명과 역(曆) 문명을 중심으로", 한국동양정치사상사연구, 18(1), pp.31~58 (2019), 한국동양정치사상사학회[DOI]
- 박홍규, "중화공동체 전략과 태종 전반기 국제관계", 평화연구, 27(1), pp.85~129 (2019), 평화와 민주주의연구소[DOI]
- Rossabi, Morris, "China Among Equals : The Middle Kingdom and Its Neighbors, 10th–14th Centuries" (1983), University of California Press
- Yuan-kang Wang, "Explaining the Tribute System: Power, Confucianism, and War in Medieval East Asia", Journal of East Asian Studies, 13(2), pp.207~232 (2013), 동아시아연구원
- Yun, Peter, "Joseon, myeong gwangye-eseo-ui yugyo inyeom-gwa jogongjedo(Confucian Ideology and the Tribute System in Joseon-Ming Relations)", Sachong (Historical Journal), 55, pp.67~88 (2002)
- Zhang, Feng, "Rethinking the ‘Tribute System’ : Broadening the Conceptual Horizon of Historical East Asian Politics", Chinese Journal of International Politics, 2(4), pp.545~574 (2009)