조선 후기 竝有喪의 실제와 禮論: 謙齋 朴聖源의 「喪中雜識」를 중심으로
The Actual State and Ritual Theory of Duplicated Funerals in Late Joseon Period: Focused on the Sangjungjobji of Kyumjae Park sungwon
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Through the Sangjungjobji written by Park sungwon, this paper reviewed the discussion of the actual and major issues of the duplicated funerals. Although the process of wearing mourning clothes was a little delayed, funeral items were prepared in advance so the funeral of Park sungwon’s mother was carried out according to the prescribed procedures. Park Sungwon conducted and recorded the procedure of the funeral, focusing on Sarepyeonram, the writing of his teacher, Lee Jae. However, after the death of his older brother, Park Choiwon, and his wife, the duplicated funerals began, resulting in a series of variations due to lack of resources and manpower. They failed to keep the funeral procedure and performed anomaly rites. In those days of frequent duplicated funerals at the time, it could be seen that practical constraints played a greater role than in ritual practice. Park Jongsik, Park Choiwon’s successor and the second son of Park Sungwon, became a chief mourner of duplicated 3 funerals, and Park Sungwon led the whole ceremony. In holding 3 funerals, it was necessary to distinguish each importance of funerals and set the order of procedure. The Father’s funeral was clearly more important than the mother’s, Since the grandmother’s funeral and the father's funeral could not be determined, the grandmother’s funeral was the first to proceed with all the procedures. Park Sungwon wanted to prepare new guidelines for the duplicated funerals through Sangjungjobji. In the case of Yeuiryujip written by Park Sungwon, he did not reveal his judgment, only organizing various examples of the issues of the duplicated funerals. On the other hand, in Sangjungjobji, he intended to select and practice reasonable examples based on its accumulated ritual knowledge. In addition, if no evidence was found, several scholars were consulted to develop guidelines for the new practice. In Sangjungjobji, Park Sungwon emphasized the legitimacy of his teacher's studies through active practice of Sarepyeonram. Sarepyeonram showed a considerable difference from Sangrebiyo written by Kim Jangsang, and Park Sungwon focused on securing the academic superiority of Lee Jae, while actively responding to the criticism. However, the shortage of manpower and material due to the duplicated funerals became a serious constraint on the application of the ritual book. If it was inevitable, it could be seen that realistic problems are recognized and funeral procedures are carried out as far as possible.
Abstract
Through the Sangjungjobji written by Park sungwon, this paper reviewed the discussion of the actual and major issues of the duplicated funerals. Although the process of wearing mourning clothes was a little delayed, funeral items were prepared in advance so the funeral of Park sungwon’s mother was carried out according to the prescribed procedures. Park Sungwon conducted and recorded the procedure of the funeral, focusing on Sarepyeonram, the writing of his teacher, Lee Jae. However, after the death of his older brother, Park Choiwon, and his wife, the duplicated funerals began, resulting in a series of variations due to lack of resources and manpower. They failed to keep the funeral procedure and performed anomaly rites. In those days of frequent duplicated funerals at the time, it could be seen that practical constraints played a greater role than in ritual practice. Park Jongsik, Park Choiwon’s successor and the second son of Park Sungwon, became a chief mourner of duplicated 3 funerals, and Park Sungwon led the whole ceremony. In holding 3 funerals, it was necessary to distinguish each importance of funerals and set the order of procedure. The Father’s funeral was clearly more important than the mother’s, Since the grandmother’s funeral and the father's funeral could not be determined, the grandmother’s funeral was the first to proceed with all the procedures. Park Sungwon wanted to prepare new guidelines for the duplicated funerals through Sangjungjobji. In the case of Yeuiryujip written by Park Sungwon, he did not reveal his judgment, only organizing various examples of the issues of the duplicated funerals. On the other hand, in Sangjungjobji, he intended to select and practice reasonable examples based on its accumulated ritual knowledge. In addition, if no evidence was found, several scholars were consulted to develop guidelines for the new practice. In Sangjungjobji, Park Sungwon emphasized the legitimacy of his teacher's studies through active practice of Sarepyeonram. Sarepyeonram showed a considerable difference from Sangrebiyo written by Kim Jangsang, and Park Sungwon focused on securing the academic superiority of Lee Jae, while actively responding to the criticism. However, the shortage of manpower and material due to the duplicated funerals became a serious constraint on the application of the ritual book. If it was inevitable, it could be seen that realistic problems are recognized and funeral procedures are carried out as far as possible.
참고문헌 (31)
- 김윤정, "謙齋 朴聖源의 禮學과 『禮疑類輯』의 성격", 한국문화, (61), pp.103~131 (2013), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 장동우, "變禮書를 통해 본 조선후기 『家禮』 연구의 특성 및 함의―『禮疑答問分類』와 『禮疑類輯』을 중심으로―", 민족문화연구, (81), pp.337~375 (2018), 민족문화연구원[DOI]
- 김윤정, "조선후기 王朝禮와 私家禮의 변주 ―國恤 중 사가례 논의를 중심으로―", 민족문화연구, (79), pp.165~194 (2018), 민족문화연구원[DOI]
- 김윤정, "英祖代 貞聖王后 國恤의 성격과 의미", 서울과 역사, (98), pp.43~81 (2018), 서울역사편찬원[DOI]
- 최은주, "조선시대 일기 자료의 실상과 가치", 대동한문학(大東漢文學), (30), pp.5~40 (2009), 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회)
- 김미영, "조선후기 상례의 미시적 연구-정재 류치명의 상례일기 『考終錄』을 중심으로-", 실천민속학 연구, 12, pp.237~257 (2008), 실천민속학회
- 오용원, "考終日記와 죽음을 맞는 한 선비의 日常 -大山 李象靖의 「考終時日記」를 중심으로-", 대동한문학(大東漢文學), (30), pp.113~147 (2009), 대동한문학회 (구.교남한문학회)
- 김윤정, "18세기 사복師服의 성격과 실제 ― 양응수의 「축장일기」를 중심으로", 국학연구, (23), pp.465~498 (2013), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
- 김윤정, "白水 楊應秀의 「四禮便覽辨疑」 연구", 규장각, (44), pp.61~92 (2014), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 권오영, "조선 후기 유림의 사상과 활동" (2003), 돌베개
- 조성산, "조선 후기 낙론계 학풍의 형성과 전개" (2007), 지식산업사
- "謙齋集", ~
- "廣巖集", ~
- "廣巖稿", ~
- "保民格言", ~
- "謙齋年譜", ~
- "광암집", ~
- "박성원문집 3" (2018)
- "家禮", ~
- 김윤정, "조선후기 四禮의 전형―『四禮便覽』을 중심으로―", 민족문화연구, (86), pp.129~161 (2020), 민족문화연구원[DOI]
- "사례편람", ~
- "家禮增解", ~
- "沙溪全書", ~
- "常變通攷", ~
- "禮記集說", ~
- "宋子大全", ~
- 장동우, "행례서行禮書를 통해 본 조선후기 『가례家禮』 연구의 특성 및 함의 — 『사례편람四禮便覽』과 『가례집요家禮輯要』를 중심으로", 국학연구, (36), pp.373~408 (2018), 한국국학진흥원[DOI]
- "貞菴集", ~
- "櫟泉集", ~
- "屛溪集", ~
- "渼湖集", ~
