본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

나카니시 이노스케의 「不逞鮮人」에 나타난 일본어의 위상

The Place of Japanese Language in Huteisenjin by Inosuke Nakanishi

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Inosuke Nakanishi(1887~1958) was born in a countryside of Kyoto. Since his childhood, he had to support himself for his schooling. Sometime around 1910, he went to Korea to work as a reporter for the Pyeongyang Daily Newspaper. He wrote an article criticizing the cruelty imposed on the Korean miners working for the Fujitagumi Mining Company. He was accused of injuring the Mining Company's credit, and sentenced to serve four months in prison. Since about 1920 in Japan, there appeared proletarian literature based on socialist thought. Around that time, many Koreans whose farm land had been forfeited by Japanese government joined Japanese anti-government movements. On the other hand Japanese socialist movement leaders who were against Japanese imperialism helped Koreans for Korean independence movement. For this reason, there were a number of Japanese proletarian writers who used Korean situations as themes for their novels. Nakanishi was a representative of such writers. Nakanishi's work, Huteisenjin, appeared in the Magazine Kaizou, September 1922, presented an interesting point that it described the Korean characters in the story in Japanese language that was the language of colonial rulers. The anonymous main character was presented as a cosmopolitanist, and he had a Korean friend whose fiancée had been killed during the March First Independence Movement. The main character wanted to see her father and went to “K village in E county” with his interpreter. The village was located in Northwest of Korean peninsula and it was at that time a gathering place for “huteisenjin(disrespecting Koreans).” In concluding part, the main character thought, ‘Everything was due to the sins of their nation.’ This was actually the thought of the author. This novel, however, does not directly deal with the colonial rule itself, but only with the unstable psychological changes of the author himself. The author was more concerned with psychological questions such as respect for Koreans or prejudice about Korea, rather than with Japanese colonial rule over Korea. Of course, the author tried hard to transcend his psychological restlessness among the Korean language speakers. But it was not an easy job.

Abstract

Inosuke Nakanishi(1887~1958) was born in a countryside of Kyoto. Since his childhood, he had to support himself for his schooling. Sometime around 1910, he went to Korea to work as a reporter for the Pyeongyang Daily Newspaper. He wrote an article criticizing the cruelty imposed on the Korean miners working for the Fujitagumi Mining Company. He was accused of injuring the Mining Company's credit, and sentenced to serve four months in prison. Since about 1920 in Japan, there appeared proletarian literature based on socialist thought. Around that time, many Koreans whose farm land had been forfeited by Japanese government joined Japanese anti-government movements. On the other hand Japanese socialist movement leaders who were against Japanese imperialism helped Koreans for Korean independence movement. For this reason, there were a number of Japanese proletarian writers who used Korean situations as themes for their novels. Nakanishi was a representative of such writers. Nakanishi's work, Huteisenjin, appeared in the Magazine Kaizou, September 1922, presented an interesting point that it described the Korean characters in the story in Japanese language that was the language of colonial rulers. The anonymous main character was presented as a cosmopolitanist, and he had a Korean friend whose fiancée had been killed during the March First Independence Movement. The main character wanted to see her father and went to “K village in E county” with his interpreter. The village was located in Northwest of Korean peninsula and it was at that time a gathering place for “huteisenjin(disrespecting Koreans).” In concluding part, the main character thought, ‘Everything was due to the sins of their nation.’ This was actually the thought of the author. This novel, however, does not directly deal with the colonial rule itself, but only with the unstable psychological changes of the author himself. The author was more concerned with psychological questions such as respect for Koreans or prejudice about Korea, rather than with Japanese colonial rule over Korea. Of course, the author tried hard to transcend his psychological restlessness among the Korean language speakers. But it was not an easy job.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 김효순, "일본작가들이 본 근대조선", pp.3~354 (2009), 소명출판
  2. 김효순, "일본작가들이 본 근대조선", pp.167~208 (2009), 소명출판
  3. 김진석, "한국심리소설연구", pp.23~167 (1998), 태학사
  4. 건미요시 도오루, "사전 이토히로부미", pp.5~16 (2002), 다락원
  5. 앤드루 고든, "현대 일본의 역사", pp.5~216 (2005), 이산
  6. 김태웅, "한국통사", pp.5~332 (2012), 아카넷
  7. 渡辺直紀, "中西伊之助の朝鮮関連の小説について­特に表記言語と人物の遠近化の関係を中心に", 日本学, 22, pp.235~267 (2003)
  8. 오황선, "근대일본문학에 나타난 조선상 ­ 中西伊之助를 중심으로 ­", 일어일문학, 22, pp.283~299 (1993)
  9. 서기재, "高浜虛子의 『朝鮮』연구--「여행안내서」로서의 의의--", 日本語文學, 16(16), pp.63~82 (2003), 한국일본어문학회
  10. 柳相熙, "나카지마 아쓰시(中島敦) 문학작품 속의 朝鮮-?巡査가 있는 風景?을 中心으로-", 日本語文學, (23), pp.365~386 (2004), 한국일본어문학회
  11. 이원희, "고바야시 마사루 문학에 나타난 식민지 조선", 일어일문학연구, 38, pp.215~232 (2001)
  12. 양연자, "일제의 대륙침략에 대한 근대 일본 문학자들의 태도", 일본문화연구, (31), pp.289~314 (2009), 동아시아일본학회
  13. 오석윤, "미요시 다쓰지(三好達治) 詩와 朝鮮 體驗", 일본학보, (60), pp.411~424 (2004), 한국일본학회
  14. 박상도, "植民地朝鮮を見る三好達治の観点 ―「南鮮雑観」「秋日記」を中心にー", 일본학보, (76), pp.203~215 (2008), 한국일본학회
  15. 崔在喆, "日本近代文?者の韓??の?化過程", 일본학보, 52, pp.541~564 (2002), 한국일본학회
  16. 金仙奇, "小衫未醒の "陣中詩篇" についての考察-朝鮮認識と反戦意識を中心に-", 日語日文学硏究, 32, pp.269~295 (1998)
  17. 水野達朗, "?向文?の「描?」と韓?-島木健作の『京城』と村山知義の『丹?』-", 일어일문학연구, 63(2), pp.121~138 (2007), 한국일어일문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (33건)